If the flight is under an hour, gonna cost you a buck and maybe even a dime extra/sheet. :( http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/04/07/ryana...x.html?hpt=SbinJimCYWG

Not the first time that one has been mooted...A pound for a pee...Didn't this get thrown out last year? I wonder what has changed...It is not as if you can "go" anywhere else at FL350. Yet more additional charges...Not my cup of tea... (that probably costs at least a quid now too!)Andrew

Well, no news here. Michael O'Leary getting some free advertising on our behalf

This is absolutely a stupid idea. If they really want to charge, they could raise the fares an extra 1 pound and no one would ever notice, and they would make even more money.

This is absolutely a stupid idea. If they really want to charge, they could raise the fares an extra 1 pound and no one would ever notice, and they would make even more money.

But if they can reduce restroom use enough they can replace one of the on board restrooms with a couple of seats. If the fares for those seats exceeds the number of passengers on the plane they could make even more money.

First time someone pees or craps themselves on an plane of theirs if they did that, and I'm willing to bet there would be a lawsuit.

I can't believe this is actually happening, although Spirit can (or is planning to, pending some government action) apparently charge for carry-ons: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/spirit-ai...bags-2010-04-06

First time someone pees or craps themselves on an plane of theirs if they did that, and I'm willing to bet there would be a lawsuit.

It would cost the airline more to deep clean the seat if I crapped on it. Especially the morning after a curry!

Restroom, that's a joke. Visit any lo cost airline toilet and you'll be lucky if you can stand up straight and avoind pi$$ing on your own shoes. I'd willing pay a