anyone not having this yet ought to... runs great with many options and ads so much to the realism effect where sound is so necessary for real flightsimming experiences!

I'm with you peter.+1steve-0 :-)

You must be talking about Accu-Sim?

I think he means Accu-feel?

A2A actually uses the term Accu-Sound on their website but it is a subset of Accu-SimLatest generation Accu-Sound now allows for a direct connection to the Accu-Sim and FSX physics engine with airflow through the airframe, windows, structural creaks, bumps, jolts etc. with over 500 sounds in all.

Ah, ok, thanks for the clarification.

Any chance of a link?!

http://a2asimulations.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=28496This is the link which provided the video explaining what Accu-Feel does.Bob

Does anybody know what a good setting for Accu-feel with EZdok in VC? Going down therunway is like being thrown in a blender is great for a old WW2 aircraft on a dirt field justnot so much in a 747 on a new runway.

Any chance of a link?!

Here's the thread about Accu-Feel on AvsimThe product page at A2A with a link to the manual at the bottom of the page.The support forum

Edited March 6, 201214 yr by Jean-Paul Mes

Unlike EZDOK, Accu-feel, from what I understand does not provide any physics, so you should not have any conflicts.Bob

Here's the thread about Accu-Feel on AvsimThe product page at A2A with a link to the manual at the bottom of the page.The support forum

Thanks Jean Paul.

I almost started a new thread, but I'll just put in my two cents here. Accu-Feel is the first addon I've purchased from A2A, and overall I think it's okay. I do have issues with it however, and have been trying to get support from A2A. I attempted to get access into their forum, but it won't allow me access. I then sent a couple e-mails, and they will not respond to them. (I put my order number in the subject line so they knew I was a legit customer). What kind of organization is this, A2A? I've never been totally dissed by an FSX vendor before.

Unlike EZDOK, Accu-feel, from what I understand does not provide any physics, so you should not have any conflicts. Bob

It does provide a measure of airframe physics, Bob - it just doesn't provide the pilot's personal physics - the head/body movements. I asked Scott about this at the A2A discussion on the DigitalThemePark forum (last Friday evening) - attended by Scott, Lewis and Cody, and it seems there is no intention to tread into EZCA's territory. I expect this could change if Marniftarr's version 2 doesn't materialize.

It does provide a measure of airframe physics, Bob - it just doesn't provide the pilot's personal physics - the head/body movements. I asked Scott about this at the A2A discussion on the DigitalThemePark forum (last Friday evening) - attended by Scott, Lewis and Cody, and it seems there is no intention to tread into EZCA's territory. I expect this could change if Marniftarr's version 2 doesn't materialize.

Hi Paul,Thanks for the correction. I associated physics with movement only, and should have taken this just a little farther.RegardsBob