Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Does Carenado make the best pilot figures in the business?

Featured Replies

C3374.jpg

 

Those who have the FSX version will know the high standard of modelling on this C337H.

New for FS2004, it is a revelation.

 

Pretty natty VC, too:

 

C337VC.jpg

Pilots look like fashion models according to Carenado. Like they just walked out of a Sears Catalouge!

Al Stiff

I think Carenado's pilots look the most realistic by far. Many other developers have "cartoon" looking pilot figures. But I can understand that they are done that way in order to save frame-rates.

 

Not sure how Carenado does it, though. Sharp human graphics and great FPS.

 

P.S. I'll take the "Sears Catalog" pilots over the "Hanna Barbera" ones, any day... ;)

Alexander Alonso

I think The Flight 1 Mustang Pilot needs to look into a Health Club Membership :)

100%75%50%d8a34be0e82d98b5a45ff4336cd0dddc

0D8701AB-1210-4FF8-BD6C-309792740F81.gif

Patrick

great FPS

 

Well I can't say that I get great frames, actually Carenado Is the worst planes on FPS in my hangar.

For example I get much better frames in the B377 from A2A and thinking about the complexety of that plane with the engine simulation and Captain of the ship functions, same goes for the Katana4X great performance.

It kind off puzzle me why the Carenado are such hog on my FSX performance. When I stopped using them I could turn my Autogen sliders a lot higher whithout getting stutters.

Allthough there is nothing wrong with the looks of these planes but I have removed all of them from my hangar as they where only collecting dust.

Carenado's figures are very well done, but I wish that they would create some new faces for different planes. You wouldn't have to change the pilot and passenger figure models, just the facial textures to add a little variety.

The pilot figure for the Flight1 Mustang I believe is modeled after Jim Rhoads at Flight1.

 

BIll

bannerAVSIM2.jpg

...It kind off puzzle me why the Carenado are such hog on my FSX performance. When I stopped using them I could turn my Autogen sliders a lot higher whithout getting stutters.

 

On my old system, (Duo Core 6750, 4Gigs RAM, Nvidia 8800GT) I had no problems running the Carenado C337 Skymaster. Yet, in some sceneries, the Katana 4X would give me an OOM (out of memory) blue screen of death. I think Carenado strikes a good balance between FPS and fidelity of detail in the graphics.

 

 

Carenado's figures are very well done, but I wish that they would create some new faces for different planes. You wouldn't have to change the pilot and passenger figure models, just the facial textures to add a little variety.

The pilot figure for the Flight1 Mustang I believe is modeled after Jim Rhoads at Flight1.

 

BIll

 

I agree wholeheartedly. A variety of well done pilot figures would be most welcomed.

 

It would be interesting if a developer could come up with a program that allows one to "build" their own pilot. Or at the very least, provide several different options that one could select from.

Alexander Alonso

It would be interesting if a developer could come up with a program that allows one to "build" their own pilot. Or at the very least, provide several different options that one could select from.

 

Alexander,

 

I whole-heartedly agree with your suggestion.

 

 

I zoomed in close the other day on the pilot of the default 172 and found what I think is the most useless animation in FSX. He was blinking his eyes!

 

Bill

bannerAVSIM2.jpg

On my old system, (Duo Core 6750, 4Gigs RAM, Nvidia 8800GT) I had no problems running the Carenado C337 Skymaster. Yet, in some sceneries, the Katana 4X would give me an OOM (out of memory) blue screen of death. I think Carenado strikes a good balance between FPS and fidelity of detail in the graphics.

 

Worst on performance for me was the Cessna Centurion210 and the King Air, Skymaster was in the middle and Cessna 185 Skywagon performed best.The Baron I didn't test so much because I didn't like it at all. But none of them performs so good as the Katana4X for me and the A2A planes.

Pretty natty VC, too:

 

Looks beautifull!

DIMITRI

gametab-dcs-p-51d-mustang.jpgcrawling_bug.gif

Yep, no doubt about it. They look like people not blocks of wood.

 

Adam

HP Omen Obelisk Gaming Computer, Intel Core i7-9700, Kingston HyperX Fury 16GB DDR4 System Memory 4.7GHz 8 cores, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Graphics with 8GB GDDR6 memory, PSU 750 watts, 1TB hard drive, Samsung T7 2TB SSD, 512 GB SSD, WD 5TB HDD,  Logitech HOTAS X52 Pro Joystick, AOC 27" monitor,

 

 

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.