April 2, 201313 yr Don't feed the trolls guys, you all need to go outside and see some sunlight. Warmest Regards, Luke Stevens What if I go outside then the 777 is released? Is that your sick plan.. :wink: like it... hehe, sometimes things get too heated up and serious in this place :unsure: Brent Lewis
April 2, 201313 yr "What if I go outside then the 777 is released? Is that your sick plan.." -flyerboy You would come back to your home after an awesome day out with your friends or significant other, do a few things around the house sit down and check the PMDG forum on your personal computer, phone or tablet (if thats how you choose to live your life) and find the forums abuzz with activity and type in the URL to the mother site triumphantly and proceed to make your purchase and spend the night flying the mighty T7. All good things in moderation.
April 2, 201313 yr Commercial Member Time is now 14:32 EDT. I'm at work. In between doing other things, I'll post here. Seeing that this is all aviation, and my job is about aviation, the people here don't mind. Time of day really doesn't mean holiday, or weekend, for some people. Kyle Rodgers
April 3, 201313 yr Why exactly are you here then? Bring life to your otherwise boring thread He's just a nobody troll. Move on guys. My join date compared to your join date :-) Time is now 14:32 EDT. I'm at work. In between doing other things, I'll post here. Seeing that this is all aviation, and my job is about aviation, the people here don't mind. Time of day really doesn't mean holiday, or weekend, for some people. No idea what your saying but I agree. Mods, please lock this thread as it has gotten out of hand. Please don't ban me... Brent Lewis
April 3, 201313 yr If I remember correctly, RSR's seat time in tubeliners resides purely in Boeing aircraft. You remember wrong. He certainly had time on the Jetstream 41, which is not a Boeing. PMDG don't just produce Boeings. They've produced the MD-11 and the J41 and are working on the DC-6B (Douglas), Dash-8 (Bombardier) and of course the much anticipated Woodpigeon (Westland). Personally I'm fed up with people reacting in horror that PMDG might do an Airbus. Before Lefteris left PMDG they were planning to do an Airbus. An Airbus is no more and no less automatic than a Boeing, but to hear some people talk it's the work of the devil. What if I go outside then the 777 is released? Is that your sick plan.. :He He: :He He:
April 3, 201313 yr Author Bring life to your otherwise boring thread Everyone knows how to have a damn joke except for you. If this is such a boring thread, you won't make it any better with your arrogance. I'll just stop responding to your posts from here. Thank you and good day. Thanks, Kevin L
April 3, 201313 yr You remember wrong. He certainly had time on the Jetstream 41, which is not a Boeing. PMDG don't just produce Boeings. They've produced the MD-11 and the J41 and are working on the DC-6B (Douglas), Dash-8 (Bombardier) and of course the much anticipated Woodpigeon (Westland). Personally I'm fed up with people reacting in horror that PMDG might do an Airbus. Before Lefteris left PMDG they were planning to do an Airbus. An Airbus is no more and no less automatic than a Boeing, but to hear some people talk it's the work of the devil. :He He: :He He: I know my logic isn't 100% but I did say "Tubeliners" so the J41 and company doesn't count. I also said "to the level of the NGX and soon to be released T7". The DC-6 will not have the systems depth of the NGX. I'm beating a dead horse actually, I'm just trying to explain a little of what RSR has said in the past regarding this subject. Thankfully, I could care less if they do a scarebus but if they do, I'll be happy for those that are interested in such a thing. If my response to this thread resembles the "horror" you speak of then you need to seriously take a long look at yourself! :rolleyes: I responded calmly and with somewhat good information! haha Personally I'm tired of reading requests of people begging for an airplane that PMDG will probably never make! Thats way more annoying than defending PMDG's stance on developing an Airbus. Jon Preston
April 3, 201313 yr I know my logic isn't 100% but I did say "Tubeliners" so the J41 and company doesn't count. I also said "to the level of the NGX and soon to be released T7". The DC-6 will not have the systems depth of the NGX. I'm beating a dead horse actually, I'm just trying to explain a little of what RSR has said in the past regarding this subject. Thankfully, I could care less if they do a scarebus but if they do, I'll be happy for those that are interested in such a thing. If my response to this thread resembles the "horror" you speak of then you need to seriously take a long look at yourself! :rolleyes: I responded calmly and with somewhat good information! haha Personally I'm tired of reading requests of people begging for an airplane that PMDG will probably never make! Thats way more annoying than defending PMDG's stance on developing an Airbus. Somewhat good information? The J41 is an airliner and its fuselage is a tube, so I'd say it was a tubeliner too. I don't want to speak for RSR and his seat time (unlike you) but I don't think his line career experience of Boeings is as wide as you imply. The one Boeing type I've seen him mention here is the 747-400. Anyway, apart from McDonnell Douglas, Douglas, British Aerospace, possibly Bombardier and not forgetting Beechcraft, PMDG only does Boeings. I'm glad you cleared that up. I didn't mean you specifically relating to "horror" reactions, I should have made that clear by separating that part of my comment from your quote. You tried to explain the apparent Boeing only approach, though I really don't think there is any such policy at PMDG. But others in this thread, and elsewhere, act as if the sky would fall in if an Airbus was ever simulated by PMDG. I'm not making any requests, and this is after all an April Fool thread. But a lot of people post in request threads claiming to know PMDG's decision making thinking. I just wish people would be more open minded, as I'm sure PMDG are. The knee-jerk response against the idea of an Airbus sim is unjustified.
April 3, 201313 yr If i remember correctly I started my statement like this: "Without trying to sound like I know the inner thinking's of RSR and team I'll say this." Keep fishing if you want, you know what I meant by "tubeliners". This is thoroughly entertaining for me so please keep replying. I'm pretty sure RSR also flew the J41. I could be wrong, my memory isn't what it used to be. They could be working on an Airbus right for all we know making this all pointless, which it is anyways considering how this topic started. Due to boredom, I felt the desire to post in this with my "somewhat accurate Information". You don't have to agree with it. Jon Preston
April 3, 201313 yr I can and will. Still stand by my statement. Forum being over run by kids.. Really? There's always that guy who changes the mood of the topic. No idea what your saying but I agree. *you're I might be young but at least I know my English. i7-6700K @ 4.5 GHz, 16 GB DDR4-2400 MHz, GTX 1070 8GB
April 3, 201313 yr Personally I'm fed up with people reacting in horror that PMDG might do an Airbus. Before Lefteris left PMDG they were planning to do an Airbus. An Airbus is no more and no less automatic than a Boeing, but to hear some people talk it's the work of the devil. How could anyone not want to fly the drop dead gorgeous A330? Alex Jevdic KORD/KHOT/KPWKA<380 love at first flight
April 3, 201313 yr Thanks for the joke. I didn't get it until I read all the replies. I'm out of it, but it's fun to scope all the umbrage.
Create an account or sign in to comment