Jump to content

Default FSX Clouds look better


MrSpeaker

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators

 

 


I forgot how good the default clouds looked, they are really soft looking, excellent for ovc conditions, even flying into them seems to be  more realistic, 

 

I agree with you to a certain extent as some of those HD cloud sets I see people post screen shots just look horrible and out of place to me. For one, I never see clouds in real life that look like some of the HD sets, especially with some of the over baked cloud shadows in them. They almost look like the were photo shopped in the screen shot and dont really belong there.

 

However I am not fond of the defaults either, but I do like the slightly softer look.

 

I've actually found some of the best results by using some of the FEX clouds and using their built in cloud builder to model my own. Using that I can adjust the shadowing, brightness and softening to my liking. On top of that I usually use then in either 512 or 1024 DXT format. By using a lower res set it not only helps performance but also helps to soften them a bit.

 

Or, i'll install an REX or FEX set and just use lower res versions to help soften them a bit. Nothing worse than clouds so sharp looking that you could slice meat with them.

 

On top of that, i've tried just about every payware sky set from REX and FEX and still come back to what I would consider still the most realistic sky set I have found by using the recompiled for FSX HDEv2 set. Not to mention its freeware as well.

 

A tip also if you like the default clouds, you can google and try the freeware Oscar clouds. They are similar looking to the defaults but with a little enhancement, or try the HDEv2 clouds that come in the FS9 package but work fine in FSX as well. Personally I tried the Oscar clouds and didn't care for them, but the freeware HDEv2 clouds look pretty nice as well.

Avsim Board of Directors | Avsim Forums Moderator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with you there. Default clouds rule. I never was convinced to buy a cloud texture addon as, each time I look at a screenshot with some,I feel them cartoonish, fake, specially at 4096. And I may add than a good weather engine  really showcases them as FSX stinks here (I've Opus).

Dominique

Simming since 1981 -  [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In REX4 I use 512 DXT, look great, soft close up. Light on fps

David Murden  MSFS   Fenix A320  PMDG 737 • MG Honda Jet • 414 / TDS 750Xi •  FS-ATC Chatter • FlyingIron Spitfire & ME109G • MG Honda Jet 

 Fenix A320 Walkthrough PDF   Flightsim.to •

DCS  A10c II  F-16c  F/A-18c • F-14 • (Others in hanger) • Supercarrier  Terrains = • Nevada NTTR  Persian Gulf  Syria • Marianas • 

• [email protected] All Cores HT ON   32GB DDR4  3200MHz RTX 3080  • TM Warthog HOTAS • TM TPR • Corsair Virtuoso XT with Dolby Atmos®  Samsung G7 32" 1440p 240Hz • TrackIR 5 & ProClip

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 


On top of that, i've tried just about every payware sky set from REX and FEX and still come back to what I would consider still the most realistic sky set I have found by using the recompiled for FSX HDEv2 set. Not to mention its freeware as well.

 

+1 Definitely the most realistic looking cloud set available.

FlightSim UK - Live To Fly

FSUK.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What always puts my off default is the way that clouds conform to their altitude too much and appear far too layered.

 

Anybody having peeked through the tiny window of an airliner cannot be agree with you. But is it an issue with the clouds rendering or the weather engine ?

Dominique

Simming since 1981 -  [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How the clouds look by themselves is a graphic rendering issue, how they are organized in layers and in the layers pertains more to the weather engine IMO. I may be wrong though. 

Dominique

Simming since 1981 -  [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How the clouds look by themselves is a graphic rendering issue, how they are organized in layers and in the layers pertains more to the weather engine IMO. I may be wrong though. 

 

Probably, my point is that with addon weather programs the issue of layering seems to vanish or at least be hidden much better than default.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not entirely, I've never encountered cloudscapes in FS as seen in the skies, specially irregular developments of a layer in the vertical dimension.

Dominique

Simming since 1981 -  [email protected] GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...