http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/MFTA.html

 

Thought this was interesting....

 

...Really highlights the training perspective/concept P3d is meant to fulfill.  I think it's great!   .......now bring on the patch!

 

Lockheed Martin does have a pretty extensive catalog of products. As far as P3D is concerned, I have done my best to only load serious aircraft...

As I peruse the list to the left of all the actual aircraft Lockheed has produced, its just ironic to see P3d ( f.n.a. FSX ) in the mx holding down the virtual skies!  Lol! While we crave the next add-on, this company is producing the next multi-million dollar x aircraft!  Thank heaven's for training! As long as they can keep improving the simulation and continue to make it inclusive to non military, I'm good with that for sure.

I never fly with a smile on my face... just in case

 

Or should I get really paranoid, I quickly show my young son a fine set of wings, say the word 'aerofoil' and suddenly its an educational application.

 

:lol:

FSX/P3D is more like a vocation than entertainment
 

You are all out of a date

 

The words "personal, consumer, or entertainment" no longer in the v2.0 EULA.

Is there a revision EULA in the works? But even if that's the case, though it may make for interesting discussion, what's most important is what LM is doing.

 

Clearly, the stage is set. The main purpose of the p3d is training... and I would think that Lockheed takes training seriously. But that's where it gets interesting... the fact that they've chosen fsx (variant) as their platform of choice, has great potential. It also speaks to what fsx has been able to achieve to allow it to serve Lockheed 's purpose/vision. How p3d will grow is now what I'm curious about.

 

 

 

Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

You have read to EULA before you can download it.

The EULA discussion again ... so let me ask you this, if I was entertained while also learning something new am I in violation?  Further more, what test equipment should I use to identify if there was any vestiges of entertainment flowing thru my brain or in my blood?  Is the entertainment a DNA strand I can identify and remove/suppress with drugs or should I seek the help of a Vulcan?

 

I'm not being serious, oh no, I can see the lawyers lining up outside my door ... knock knock ... who's there ... an entertainment lawyer ... so if I let you in, am I entertaining you?  I'm so confused!

Considering LM's EULA change, and their continuing 'no entertainment purpose' on their website at the same time ... would you mind me saying that LM has changed from "wink&nudge" to "nudge&wink"?!?   :rolleyes:

Read the pinned thread "Prepar3D v2.0 Professional EULA" and understand what it means.

http://forum.avsim.net/topic/430160-prepar3d-v20-professional-eula/

Lol..

 

 

I hope this will not collapse into an EULA discussion as I believe we are way past that if we were able to make the purchase.

 

And though I entitled the thread as such, please do not think I for one am having an ounce less fun because of an EULA or the premise of training. Rather, understanding that training is simple the discipline of adhering to higher standards.... , that's really what I'm curious about.

 

As a comparison... DCS also has a platform for the training specifically for the military... But they also produce titles for entertainment. LM's approach is more open and inclusive but for pro vs academic. But that also could allow the core program to be enhanced and fruits "enjoyed" across the board.... So I'm curious.

 

 

 

 

.... Where is that patch?

I want the MFTA in my house! That cockpit is pretty sweet.

Why do people keep bringing up time and time again possibly the most boring subject in flight simming ,it is like a dog chasing it,s tail ,it always end up going round in a circles till it usually falls down,totaly pointless