May 8, 201511 yr Commercial Member Looking good. Kyle Weber (Private Pilot, ASEL; Flight Test Engineer)Check out my repaints and downloads, all right here on AVSIM
May 9, 201511 yr Great shots. Intel i-9 13900KF @ 6.0 Ghz, MSI RTX 4090 Suprim Liquid X 24GB, MSI MAG CORELIQUID C360, MSI Z790 A-PRO WIFI, MSI MPG A1000G 1000W, G.SKILL 48Gb@76000 MHz DDR5, MSI SPATIUM M480 PCIe 4.0 NVMe M.2 2TB, Windows 11 Pro Ghost Spectre x64 “We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the day and night to visit violence on those who would do us harm”.
May 9, 201511 yr Author Commercial Member Thanks, all Today I made the flight again, this time in the A320neo by JARDesign: http://fly-xplane.blogspot.de/2015/05/jardesign-a320neo-panc-to-pajn.html Mario Donick .:. vFlyteAir
May 10, 201511 yr Very nice screenies, Mario Any attempt to stretch fuel is guaranteed to increase headwinds My specs: AMD Radeon RX6700XT, AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, 32GB RAM, 34" monitor, screen resolution: 2560x1080
May 10, 201511 yr Thanks, all Today I made the flight again, this time in the A320neo by JARDesign: http://fly-xplane.blogspot.de/2015/05/jardesign-a320neo-panc-to-pajn.html So the shots were made with Peter Hager's model? Vu Pham i7-13700K 5.2 GHz OC, 64 GB RAM, RTX5090, SSD for Sim, SSD for system. MSFS2020, XP-12, DCS
May 10, 201511 yr Dude :Applause: :Applause: :Applause: James Speirs ICAO PPL (A) and Aspiring Commercial pilot http://vkenya.or.ke
May 10, 201511 yr Author Commercial Member Very nice! Is it the Peter Hager model? So the shots were made with Peter Hager's model? The screenshots in my post were made with the QPAC A320-232 v2 (basic). The QPAC A320 v2 has the most simple graphics of the three A320 models I'm currently playing with, but IMO the best FBW and systems modelling (except the MCDU, which in the basic version is missing procedures and all the performance stuff). The Hager A320neo is partly very similar to the QPAC, esp. as it also uses the QPAC's FBW plugin (as does the Flight Factor A350, too, by the way). In general it also has good systems modelling, but the MCDU has even less functions than the QPAC one. It also has a simplified NAV display. The JARDesign A320neo has the best 3D model (inside and outside), but I find its flight behavior (FBW) and autopilot very inconsistent. The MCDU is more complete than on the QPAC and Hager A320, but it is quite buggy and sometimes does not work as expected (for example, I could not select any SID for PANC, although the NAV data were correctly installed and up-to-date). Of course these are just my subjective experiences. I know many people like the JARDesign Airbus very much. Mario Donick .:. vFlyteAir
Create an account or sign in to comment