CaptKornDog

Meh. I probably haven’t touched the plane in 5 years at this point. If it comes out, great, it was fun back in the day. If not, I’ve stopped losing sleep over it long ago. Heck, haven’t thought about it for quite some time, and nearly forgot about it, until seeing this thread. Disappointed the Q200/300 never came about. (A quality Metroliner nowadays would be cool also.)

Love that livery, nice photos.

Anyone know 2024 compatibility with the Comanche? Alright bought the thing twice for FSX and P3D…the thought of buying it for a 3rd and possibly 4th time for 2020 and 2024…ugh… haha.

Don't feel bad, I absolutely want an enjoyable ATR in the sim. So many of my favorite historical airlines flew it. Unfortunately, I haven't touched it in months between the instability, flight modeling, and just workarounds I've had to follow.

First time flying into DFW in a while - if I'm understanding this correctly, I have to remove City Update 10, as well as World Update 10 PG cities for the blurry ground to disappear? Thanks.

Bumps, slopes, terrain issues Static aircraft that can’t be removed (or cars/objects, etc. I Iike options and don’t really care about the blue car parked on the 4th floor of the parking garage when I’m taxiing). Terminals/ramps that are not properly lit at night Misaligned jetways Misaligned runway markings and subsequently night lighting (edge lights in one location, light effects in another) Default and/or wrong taxiway signs Inefficient/excessive VRAM usage

I’ll say I certainly appreciate the competition between the AI products though; it only benefits the community.

Awesome list of updates.

Thank you for the auto update feature!

I have a handful of the sceneries as well. Price is good and quality is enjoyable for me. No terrain or performance issues I’ve noticed.

Well, I finally got a workaround implemented to selected the “latest” options in the Nvidia app. But boy, no idea what it is, but I’m still just seeing noticeable ghosting on EICAS and PFD tapes on the Fenix and PMDG. Is it better than before? Yes. But nowhere near “not noticeable.” Seems to be a performance bump, at least a very little on my system, but the ghosting on my instruments will still make this a no-go for me, sadly.

Used the swapper, and still getting stuck with 2020 and the "unsupported" override being locked out. Reinstalled the driver and Nvidia app, so I'm at a loss now. Guess I missed a step or am doing something wrong with my 4080 Super.

Gave it a try myself yesterday; while it appears to have some improvement, ghosting is still definitely there for me. Most noticeable on EICAS or PFD tapes unless I'm zoomed in pretty far. A step in the right direction, I suppose, but still sad I'm not able to use it as my daily setting (4080 Super here).

Well, we didn’t get the 172/182 for 2020. Hoping we see it in 2024.

Ugh, I have been wanting to like this plane. I love the PC-12 IRL and have a lot of experience with it; a seamless and well-performing PC-12 in MSFS would have easily been in my top 10 or 5 desired aircraft. It just isn't quite there yet for me. I'm still struggling with the jerky autopilot in altitude modes with the TDS GTN - though I guess that's somehow a GTN limitation (above my head).

Would absolutely love to have anything more than 10 custom views.

Seeing the comments on here about surpassing native 4000 series frame gen is mildly intriguing. On my 240 Hz 1440p panel with a 4080S and native frame gen with AutoFPS, I get about 70-90 on the ground and about 110-120 in the air (right now the A300 at JFK or LHR is my stress test usually). If suddenly using this app could push me to 100-120+ all around, I’d be thrilled. I still see some tiny stutters down in the 70s and 80s (but oh how far we’ve come in the past few years alone). And the ghosting while panning or ghosting on instruments is absolutely still noticeable for me, Assuming you’d be using this and disable native FG?

Can’t wait for some Mesaba flying.

wsreset.exe did not work for me. When I'm unlucky enough to hit the check for update screen, it easily adds 20+ minutes to my startup.

Trying to keep up with this thread. I guess the consensus is: running my 4080S on a 1440p panel (165 Hz), with native FG giving me about 70-80 FPS on the ground and 100-110+ in the air, I shouldn't really muck with this? Or are folks seeing that much of a benefit when run on top of native FG....sure it would be cool to get 165 FPS matched to my panel, but is this even in the realm of possibility?

Assuming this has no benefit with RTX 4000 series cards?

Not to derail the original subject too badly, forgive me - how did you get Fenix to work with Time Machine? Unfortunately, while it seems to see a flight plan; it simply doesn't do anything when I try to accelerate. If it's easier, you could PM me what you do perhaps? I'd appreciate it!

It's great to see updated terminals. My one request would be to have a way to disable the terminal detailed interiors. While it's cool to pan around and see from the cockpit; the parallax windows are just fine for me...I'd much rather have the little extra performance than have to render an interior that I'll never see outside of the first and last couple of minutes of a flight.

Looks great, thank you.

There’s a specific forum for it? Wasn’t aware of that, anyone mind sharing a link?