December 31, 20169 yr Author AIRAC cycles do not cause memory leaks. I believe memory leaks are caused by certain missed approach procedures at a certain runway at certain airports. Please see post #1 of this thread - http://www.avsim.com/topic/468259-07may15-detailed-discussion-of-resolved-777-vas-leak/?hl="memory+leak" - for what a memory leak is. Kind of makes you want to stay away their new EHAM. I would like get it but ...To make it more accurate, the navdata contains head-to-radial-intercept missed approach at certain airports which causes memory leak. Anyway, I found that the memory does not leak anymore after I got Aerosoft MA EDDF v2 uninstalled. The sim just leaked vas along the flight from LOWW to EGLL even though EDDF was not orgin nor destination... Intel Core i7-6700K @4.6GHz // ASUS ROG Maximus VIII HERO // G.SKILL Ripjaws V 3000MHz CL15 8GB // INNO3D iCHILL GTX770 4GB OC // Corsair h110iGT
December 31, 20169 yr I have both Toronto and EHAM flytampa. Didn't test in Toronto, but I tested the PMDG 777 in EHAM and it's quite risky to get there even using medium settings (I'm using FSX SP2). At TOD I was at 2,6GB and I ended at gate with the aircraft shut down with 3,8/3,9 GB with the ding ding in the background. I'd like to underline the fact that in many other airports with payware sceneries I can use the 777 and stay well below the VAS limit.
December 31, 20169 yr I think I will stick with Aerosoft's EHAM and all of it's fault. I don't need to spend 28 Euros on a new set of faults. Michael Cubine
December 31, 20169 yr 28€ plus VAT and from my side all thrown away ... Did you install the light texture pack for EHAM? - David Lee
January 1, 20179 yr Did you install the light texture pack for EHAM? - David Lee Reading through FT forum people who have tested with LITEX, didn't show much improvement. So I didn't download them.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.