Sign in to follow this  
HiFlyer

Random Aerofly FS2 Over Innsbruck and Chicago

Recommended Posts

Cruising along at up to 350Fps I pause to snap some pic's that catch my eye, using the combination of Aerofly and Orbx. 

dyhJuw.jpg


QbKp51.png


mGNpJk.png


l3fm0N.png


E0dBdU.png


EBIoBG.png


VrRSOI.png


92gA1H.png


c9Eqni.png


yPojOf.png


Dek0nj.png


ipXtZZ.png


uwYxBg.png


bcM6yg.png


SSJg5q.png

 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Help AVSIM continue to serve you!
Please donate today!

Nice shots... how quickly one adapts to the look of the new sim!

You can browse other Innsbruck threads around here to reinforce how good AFS2 looks.

Idle thought: why is LOWI so well represented in the sims?? :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, WingZ said:

Nice shots... how quickly one adapts to the look of the new sim!

You can browse other Innsbruck threads around here to reinforce how good AFS2 looks.

Idle thought: why is LOWI so well represented in the sims?? :laugh:

I think it is the romantic allure of the Swiss Alps...Sound of Music "the hills are alive, with the sound of music"....that sort of thing... :gaul:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, from my perspective, they started off at least matching FSX default, and have since gone on to resemble some pretty good third party planes, though they are still missing some features that Ipacs is working to add.

If anything, on my side at least, i'm a bit worried that in their enthusiasm, some of our more hardcore users are driving Ipacs towards attempting to produce payware quality planes for free, which is a little unfair. Yet Ipacs seems game to try........

In the end, I would say its an early access sim: still growing, but showing lots of promise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, HiFlyer said:

If anything, on my side at least, i'm a bit worried that in their enthusiasm, some of our more hardcore users are driving Ipacs towards attempting to produce payware quality planes for free, which is a little unfair. Yet Ipacs seems game to try........

Very true. I know it's very easy to criticize and give unrequested advices, but I've been indeed surprised that they've decided to focus on doing a very complex, payware level aircraft, when maybe they should have introduced basic functioning systems (fuel, etc.) for all aircrafts (although I'm aware that the capabilities introduced in the Q400 will also serve the aforementioned goal). On the other hand, the planned ATC seems a very good idea instead.

Sometimes it's better not to listen to hardcore users. :laugh:

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this