Jump to content

Monitor Refresh rate...how important to flight simming?


Recommended Posts

Posted

60 Hz versus 144 Hz..does it really matter?

Looking for a new 27 inch monitor and the difference in price is quite wide.

Cheers.

spacer.png


 

Posted

In my opinion important for general gaming, not important for flight simming... i have one 27" 144hz g-sync monitor and a 4k 60/30hz TV, and my choice goes to.... 30hz TV best relation performance/looks.

Marques

Ryzen 7 [email protected] | Arctic Liquid Freezer II 360| RTX 4070 ti | 32GB Ram @5600MHZ| Crucial MX 200 M.2 500GB |Crucial MX200 SATA 500GB | HTC Vive | XIAOMI 43" 4k TV | Acer Predator 27" G-Sync | AOC 32" Freesync

Posted

I have a 100Hz G-Sync Acer Predator Ultrawide 34". It is a really good monitor, but the higher rates are important for other games, considering that: 1- P3D/XP11 are locked on 30fps, 2- I would not care too much about the Monitor, considering that I prefer VR.

So, if you enjoy gaming besides simming, higher refresh rates monitors are definitely something nice to have. If not, don`t bother.

AMD Ryzen 7800X3D | Zotac RTX 4090 Trinity | Asus TUF X670E-Plus | G.SKILL 64GB DDR5 PC 6000 CL30 | 4TB NVMe  | Noctua NH-D15 | Asus TUF 1000W Gold | be quiet! Pure Base 500DX | Noctua NH-D15S | LG OLED CX 48" + 2x 15.6" Touch-screen Panels

Thrustmaster Boeing TCA Yoke - Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog - Honeycomb Bravo Throttle - MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals - TrackIR - Stream Deck XL + Stream Deck Plus - Meta Quest 3 (VR)
 
Posted

For P3D, having a monitor capable of 30Hz and 60Hz operation is an important feature for me since using the monitor setting as the frame rate limiting mechanism is giving me the smoothest performance.

[email protected] - ROG Strix Z790-E - 2X16Gb G.Skill Trident DDR5 6400 CL32 - MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - WD SN850X 2 TB M.2 - XPG S70 Blade 2 TB M.2 - MSI A1000G PCIE5 1000 W 80+ Gold PSU - Liam Li 011 Dynamic Razer case - 58" Panasonic TC-58AX800U 4K - Pico 4 VR  HMD - WinWing HOTAS Orion2 MAX - ProFlight Pedals - TrackIR 5 - W11 Pro (Passmark:12574, CPU:63110-Single:4785, GPU:50688)

Posted
2 hours ago, odourboy said:

For P3D, having a monitor capable of 30Hz and 60Hz operation is an important feature for me since using the monitor setting as the frame rate limiting mechanism is giving me the smoothest performance.

I currenty own a TCL 4K 43 inch TV.  It runs 30hz and 60hz in all resolutions.  So do you just set your monitor to 30hz in windows?  Do you set your frames to 30, or 31 or unlimited in P3DV4?

Posted
1 hour ago, franjoflyer said:

I currenty own a TCL 4K 43 inch TV.  It runs 30hz and 60hz in all resolutions.  So do you just set your monitor to 30hz in windows?  Do you set your frames to 30, or 31 or unlimited in P3DV4?

I leave frames at unlimited in the P3D and VSync on. I set 30Hz or 60Hz using the NVidia Control panel (equivalent to setting it in Windows), the choice depends on the complexity of the situation and the aircraft. I can pause P3D and alter my setting on the fly if I've chosen poorly. YMMV.

[email protected] - ROG Strix Z790-E - 2X16Gb G.Skill Trident DDR5 6400 CL32 - MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - WD SN850X 2 TB M.2 - XPG S70 Blade 2 TB M.2 - MSI A1000G PCIE5 1000 W 80+ Gold PSU - Liam Li 011 Dynamic Razer case - 58" Panasonic TC-58AX800U 4K - Pico 4 VR  HMD - WinWing HOTAS Orion2 MAX - ProFlight Pedals - TrackIR 5 - W11 Pro (Passmark:12574, CPU:63110-Single:4785, GPU:50688)

Posted

So, there is a big price difference between 60 Hz and 144Hz...is 60 Hz going to be good enough for fluid flight simming?

Keeping in mind I (like most of us) never get up to or over 60FPS anyhow in FSX/P3D?

spacer.png


 

Posted

IMHO, yes 60hz provides a very smooth simming experience. Of course, you want to hear from somebody who's tried 144. :blush:

[email protected] - ROG Strix Z790-E - 2X16Gb G.Skill Trident DDR5 6400 CL32 - MSI RTX 4090 Suprim X - WD SN850X 2 TB M.2 - XPG S70 Blade 2 TB M.2 - MSI A1000G PCIE5 1000 W 80+ Gold PSU - Liam Li 011 Dynamic Razer case - 58" Panasonic TC-58AX800U 4K - Pico 4 VR  HMD - WinWing HOTAS Orion2 MAX - ProFlight Pedals - TrackIR 5 - W11 Pro (Passmark:12574, CPU:63110-Single:4785, GPU:50688)

Posted

My halfpenny's worth...

If consideration is restricted to refresh rates only (colour representation, luminosity, asthetics etc are variably important to diff people as well)...

Since any benefit of a higher available monitor refresh rate will only be extremely marginal unless your sim is able to sustain fps approaching that,  IMHO any refresh rate available above 60Hz is pointless for P3D at the present moment in time.  

Better to get a cheapish 4k tv that does at least 30 and 60 hz (I chose one on clearance as a discontinued model that supports 25,30,50 and 60Hz.) and invest any other cash in the best GPU you can get.

I cannot forsee a use case (involving a monitor) in the next few years where being able to maintain a solid fps approaching anywhere near 144 would be preferable to being able to maintain 60fps with higher settings.

Kevin Firth - AMD 9800X3D; Asus Prime X670E; 64Gb Cas30 6000 DDR5; RTX3090; AutoFPS; FG mod

Beta tester for: UK2000; JustFlight; VoxATC; FSReborn; //42

spacer.png xaP1VAU.png

Posted

One thing I hear consistently is the 144hz, outside of simming/gaming, gives more smooth desktop performance in common task.

spacer.png


 

Posted
1 hour ago, Boomer said:

One thing I hear consistently is the 144hz, outside of simming/gaming, gives more smooth desktop performance in common task.

depends on a) how much use you make of desktop apps; b) how much you benefit personally from increased refresh rates; and c) whether the cost of a monitor supporting such higher refresh rates is worth the benefit that you personally  perceive...

It's a very subjective area, only you can decide for you.

Kevin Firth - AMD 9800X3D; Asus Prime X670E; 64Gb Cas30 6000 DDR5; RTX3090; AutoFPS; FG mod

Beta tester for: UK2000; JustFlight; VoxATC; FSReborn; //42

spacer.png xaP1VAU.png

Posted

Well funny thing is I have been using a 24” 60hz monitor for flight simming for years and never noticed any trouble.  So of course I have to wonder if 144hz is worth the extra money...leaning towards no.

spacer.png


 

Posted
15 hours ago, Boomer said:

How would p3d look on a 32” monitor?

Depends what resolution.  I ran on a 28" @ 1920x1200 for years and it was fine.  You'd prob need some anti-aliasing at 32" I would think.   There's undoubtedly a totally different experience at 50" 4k though.   Either way is going to require some GPU horsepower to be able to turn settings up.

Kevin Firth - AMD 9800X3D; Asus Prime X670E; 64Gb Cas30 6000 DDR5; RTX3090; AutoFPS; FG mod

Beta tester for: UK2000; JustFlight; VoxATC; FSReborn; //42

spacer.png xaP1VAU.png

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...