GCBraun

You did not describe the issue you are having. On SimAppPro, make sure to select "Single-stroke double shaft. Having it set to double stroke double shaft may be the reason why it is not working…

Make sure to use the 16k textures that are available for most of the theaters. They make a huge difference. Don't expect DCS-level graphics, though.

As mentioned above, for sure the dynamic campaigns. The human player only plays a small role in the big picture. Falcon BMS is not as pretty as DCS, but the experience is much, much deeper. Besides F-16 and its dozen variants for multiple countries, there is also a very good F-15C.

After finally giving a real chance to Falcon BMS, I have barely touched DCS. Amazing what they’ve done with a game from 1998.

Will there be an option to remove the winglets on the 700? It would be great to see more emphasis on features that reflect real-world configurations, rather than focusing primarily on visual enhancements.

What is the goal of this product? Will it deliver simple functionalities like a fly-by camera that does not break the built-in Camera system? Thanks

Thank you, Winctrl! Filling a niche with very competitive pricing without sacrificing quality too much.

In Europe their delivery, replacement and support efforts have worked quite well for me. I had an issue with the ENG1 switch in my Ursa Throttle and got a replacement part about a week later after reporting the problem to Winctrl's support.

You think no code, model or textures from the A321 ceo are used in the neo?

Demanding full price (or 72 Euros) for existing A321 costumer has to be a bad joke. They seem to be stuck in the P3D market reality. I’d rather wait a decade for Fenix to release their NEOs. Will surely cost less for all models.

Chaseplane is not VR compatible. A new camera API is being released with SU5. Bad timing when it comes to this questionable forced bundle.

The camera API does not take anything away from the sim. Quite the opposite. There‘s nothing not to like in it.

There lots of us who care, so why even comment?

Chaseplane is a complete workaround. This is not to blame the developers, since they surely did their best without APIs. Now, having native camera APIs is great news for everyone. Not only can Chaseplane improve, but freeware camera tools will likely emerge to suit simpler needs. In my case, I am totally satisfied with the built-in camera system, if not for the lack of fly-by, which will hopefully soon be easy to implement!

+1 This has been somewhat promised in their official forums, but I would not hold my breath.

Try changing to Single-stroke double shaft on Winctrl's SimAppPro if you have single shaft selected.

They don't have scripts, but they work just fine. Just install them into Stream Deck and you are good to go.

Yes, it works perfectly well with all of these planes. I also use it with GA aircraft to pop-out touch panels like the TDS GTN and it is also great for that use-case.

Yes, I see the same behavior as you, but when assigning the throttles using MSFS 2024's UI, the throttles work! So this erratic behavior (levers jumping back to idle) only happens when using AAO.

I know. My goal was to use AAO in 2024 for the throttle axis, but it seems that for this plane it is not possible.

Yes. It only seems to work if I use the dreadful 2024 built-in UI. In 2020 I could indeed use AAO. Thanks.

Similarly to the discussed in the Ejet Thread, I am currently not able to use AAO to map my Honeycomb Bravo Throttle Axis in MSFS 2024. For the Ejets, the solution was to use a specific LVAR to assign the throttles (L:FSS_EXX_LEVER_THROTTLE_L_MOUSE_INP, Number and L:FSS_EXX_LEVER_THROTTLE_R_MOUSE_INP, Number). I wonder if someone has figured out a way to make this work with the 727 as well. Thanks!

Yes, but no recurring costs with APLV2. This looks interesting, but it is subscription based as far as I am aware.

Even though I personally like the A340 more as an aircraft, the PMDG 777 is overall the superior product. It benefits from many years of development, especially when it comes to system depth and maturity. iniBuilds does have an edge in texturing, in my opinion, but a word of warning for cockpit builders: since the displays cannot be popped out individually (unlike on most other advanced airliners), the A340 is not well suited for this use case. Design decisions like this tend to make me a bit skeptical about purchasing ini products.

It probably would be for me as well, if not for the FS9 level textures. 😣