GCBraun

For me, the choice is clear: I switch to XP12 when I'm in the mood for adventure. MSFS is pleasing, safe, and dependable, while XP12 is unpredictable, risky, and almost psychedelic—just like having an affair.

MSFS has supported frame generation for a long time, so there's no need to limit yourself to 30fps in that sim if you have a supported DX12 card. Even if that's not the case, frame-generation mods like lossless scaling can essentially double performance without generating extra heat. This allows users of legacy sims and cards to achieve the fluidity that is missing at 30Hz.

One should not forget that freeware includes not only community-produced content but also dozens (or even hundreds) of high-quality scenery and aircraft made available by Asobo/MS over the years for free. This level of support and content release is unprecedented in previous sims.

Sorry, I have a full-time job and kids and don't have the time to fiddle with outdated tools to generate content for an outdated sim. MSFS clearly stands out with the most engaged and productive freeware content creators of any simulation platform to date. Truly plug & play in the majority of cases.

I've ended up using the Samsung browser, which also has this full-screen functionality. It works without issues there.

Was that the case with Italy as well? Anyway, I actually think Kane deserves to win a title at last, so I won’t be bothered rooting against England this time.

Beautiful. That VARIG livery is one of my favorites of all time (number 1 is the original VARIG livery).

That's precisely my approach too. I've always been platform-agnostic and have invested heavily in all of them over the years. The issue with P3D is that it's now so far behind the competition that I'd rather use the disk space for my MSFS community folder or XP Orthoscenery.

I’m not criticizing you. I just find it interesting that you always make a point of saying you haven’t purchased MSFS, don’t plan to, or would only use it for VFR and sightseeing. You’ve made that clear over the years, so perhaps there’s no need to repeat it. My reference to FS9 highlights what we've avoided with the Microsoft-Asobo synergy. Instead of lethargic side-steps, we now have a modern, forward-thinking platform that has increased value and enjoyment for millions of simmers, including casual players, hardcore enthusiasts, and both IFR and VFR fans. I have no issue if some people are not ready or willing to switch or add another sim to their collection. However, I am concerned when those individuals criticize the very reasons why MSFS has been an undisputed success. I want more innovation, not less. Otherwise, I’d purchase P3D V6.

And we are all glad for that. Otherwise we would still be stuck with the FS9 way of doing things.

If someone has also used the Rotate MD-11 for XP and could do a quick comparison, that would be appreciated. As a user from both sims, I generally do not purchase the same aircraft type twice, unless there is a significant reason to do so.

What’s even the point of selling old versions of products for a defunct platform? I believe that most people who wanted to buy the P3D version have already done so. Surely PMDG has taken that decision based on data and facts.

No. Will be trying in a different Android Tablet soon.

Non-sense is criticizing what others decide to do with their simulated flights. Personally, I sometimes use time compression and sometimes I don't. Sitting at a computer for 12 hours just to monitor the autopilot is not something I'm willing to do. Nevertheless, I do want to experience flight-deck preparation, take-off, climb, approach, and landing with heavy aircraft in a long-haul scenario, so time compression is a completely legitimate thing to do. It's also fully supported by PMDG with their auto-cruise functionality.