YES.

YESit makes no sense to say 'we need backwards compatability' and thenmake so few of the old things work while at the same time designingfor hardware that doesn't even exist yet!

I say yes. I can do without backwards compatibility if thats what it takes to have a sim that works better.

Oh yes!Allcott

YESBackward compatibility not important for me except for key featuresMulti-core and SLI support that I was expecting in FSX would have saved me from spending several thousand dollars that I will have to repeat once Vista/DX10 is available.Re WOZ

My post was deleted for some odd reason. I voted yes though.

YES

YES!and fix the darn problem in FSX, we cannot all wait for another three years!!!

Why. What's wrong with the current one?

The "graphics engine"? Huh??RhettAMD 3700+ (@2530 mhz), eVGA 7800GT 256 (Guru3D 93.71), ASUS A8N-E, PC Power 510 SLI, 2 GB Corsair XMS 3-3-3-8, WD 250 gig 7200 rpm SATA2, CoolerMaster Praetorian

Do a search on the forum i'm sure you will spend the rest of your day reading all about it.

God YES it needs a total re-write. FSX shouldn't have used that old dead horse excuse for an engine either. Just look at these Framerates compared to some quality titles.$5000-$7000 machines too.http://forums.avsim.net/user_files/162579.jpg

YES they should already have done it for FS-X though

I don't know enough to answer.What definative advantage will a new a graphics engine give to MSsim?Maybe we have a new graphics engine in FSX and don't know it?.All I know is its not black or white.Interesting subjectJohn

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes,Doug