February 21, 20215 yr Oculus Quest 2 looks likely to be updated with a 120Hz refresh rate, according to comments made by the Vice President of Facebook Reality Labs. During a Q&A session on Instagram, Andrew 'Boz' Bosworth responded with a literal ‘thumbs up’ to a question about whether Quest 2 would see an update to 120Hz, and touched on a number of other topics relating to VR. The faster the refresh rate in a VR headset, the smoother the virtual world it creates, and so 120Hz marks a dramatic improvement on the 72Hz refresh rate the Quest 2 originally launched with (before being updated with support for 90Hz in November 2020). https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/oculus-quest-2-will-be-updated-with-120hz-refresh-rate-says-facebook-insider AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 4.2 32 gig ram, Nvidia RTX3060 12 gig, Intel 760 SSD M2 NVMe 512 gig, M2NVMe 1Tbt (OS) M2NVMe 2Tbt (MSFS) Crucial MX500 SSD (Backup OS). VR Oculus Quest 2 Windows 11 25H2 YouTube:- https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC96wsF3D_h5GzNNJnuDH3WQ 2k+ Videos & Streams BATC and FSFO FB Group:- https://www.facebook.com/groups/1571953959750565 Flight Sim First Officer (FSFOv6) and SoFly Beta Tester Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation!
February 22, 20215 yr Its a lot of frames to pump out, but i guess if they can get ASW to up the 30 to 120, it could be good.
February 22, 20215 yr 120hz will not mean anything with MSFS in VR Edited February 22, 20215 yr by blueshark747 Asus Maximus X Hero Z370/ Windows 10 MSI Gaming X 1080Ti (2100 mhz OC Watercooled) 8700k (4.7ghz OC Watercooled) 32GB DDR4 3000 Ram 500GB SAMSUNG 860 EVO SERIES SSD M.2
February 23, 20215 yr Good luck getting anywhere near those frames. ROG MAXIMUS X HERO, Intel Core i7 8700K, 32 GB's 3200 RAM, Gigabyte RTX3080,
February 23, 20215 yr The problem with current VR is not refresh rates, but resolution. Processor: Intel i9-13900KF 5.8GHz 24-Core, Graphics Processor: Nvidia RTX 4090 24GB GDDR6, System Memory: 64GB High Performance DDR5 SDRAM 5600MHz, Operating System: Windows 11 Home Edition, Motherboard: Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite AX, LGA 1700, CPU Cooling: Corsair H100i Elite 240mm Liquid Cooling, RGB and LCD Display, Chassis Fans: Corsair Low Decibel, Addressable RGB Fans, Power Supply: Corsair HX1000i Fully Modular Ultra-Low-Noise Platinum ATX 1000 Watt, Primary Storage: 2TB Samsung Gen 4 NVMe SSD, Secondary Storage: 1TB Samsung Gen 4 NVMe SSD, VR Headset: Meta Quest 2, Primary Display: SONY 4K Bravia 75-inch, 2nd Display: SONY 4K Bravia 43-inch, 3rd Display: Vizio 28-inch, 1920x1080. Controller: Xbox Controller attached to PC via USB.
February 23, 20215 yr the next gen VR headsets will for sure have higher res, but the main problem with todays HMD and even future HMD's is the Vergence Accommodation Conflict. if anyone interested its explained here: https://youtu.be/YWA4gVibKJE or Google for: Lanman Vergence Accommodation Conflict
February 23, 20215 yr 19 hours ago, blueshark747 said: 120hz will not mean anything with MSFS in VR It will mean smoother flight...a long as you’re getting around 240 FPS in flatscreen mode. You lads are not getting 240 atm in MSFS?? 😉 Oz Sim Rig: MSI RTX3090 Suprim, an old, partly-melted Intel 9900K @ 5GHz+, Honeycomb Alpha, Thrustmaster TPR Rudder, Warthog HOTAS, Reverb G2, Prosim 737 cockpit. Currently flying: MSFS: PMDG 737-700, Fenix A320, Leonardo MD-82, MIlviz C310, Flysimware C414AW, DC Concorde, Carenado C337. Prepar3d v5: PMDG 737/747/777. "There are three simple rules for making a smooth landing. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are."
February 23, 20215 yr 4 hours ago, David Mills said: The problem with current VR is not refresh rates, but resolution. The problem in flightsim is one of performance. Something like the Reverb 2 has adequate resolution, but a sim like MSFS can not make use of this at a decent refresh rate. Ideally, we want 60/90/120 Hz PLUS slightly better resolution PLUS wider field of view. Oz Sim Rig: MSI RTX3090 Suprim, an old, partly-melted Intel 9900K @ 5GHz+, Honeycomb Alpha, Thrustmaster TPR Rudder, Warthog HOTAS, Reverb G2, Prosim 737 cockpit. Currently flying: MSFS: PMDG 737-700, Fenix A320, Leonardo MD-82, MIlviz C310, Flysimware C414AW, DC Concorde, Carenado C337. Prepar3d v5: PMDG 737/747/777. "There are three simple rules for making a smooth landing. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are."
February 23, 20215 yr 10 hours ago, OzWhitey said: Ideally, we want 60/90/120 Hz PLUS slightly better resolution PLUS wider field of view. The Valve Index have a 80/90/120 and 144Hz resolution. the last years i tested all this Hz with different Games /Apps, and the higher you go with the Hz the world around you just feels more closer to reality, and especially more stable as you move around. Michael Abrash an Oculus Chief Scientist described this allready years ago and said an aprox 1000Hz display is needed to simulate the Reality very close. Edited February 23, 20215 yr by Nedo68
February 24, 20215 yr 5 hours ago, Nedo68 said: The Valve Index have a 80/90/120 and 144Hz resolution. the last years i tested all this Hz with different Games /Apps, and the higher you go with the Hz the world around you just feels more closer to reality, and especially more stable as you move around. Michael Abrash an Oculus Chief Scientist described this allready years ago and said an aprox 1000Hz display is needed to simulate the Reality very close. 1000 frames per second? Sir, this is Avsim. No flightsim user needs more than 20 fps, the human eye cannot detect more than this! 😉 Oz Sim Rig: MSI RTX3090 Suprim, an old, partly-melted Intel 9900K @ 5GHz+, Honeycomb Alpha, Thrustmaster TPR Rudder, Warthog HOTAS, Reverb G2, Prosim 737 cockpit. Currently flying: MSFS: PMDG 737-700, Fenix A320, Leonardo MD-82, MIlviz C310, Flysimware C414AW, DC Concorde, Carenado C337. Prepar3d v5: PMDG 737/747/777. "There are three simple rules for making a smooth landing. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are."
March 1, 20215 yr If only we could buy graphics cards, and no, I'm not going to pay scalpers. R5 3600 - GTX 1070OC - 32GB 3200 - NVME - 3440x1440 160Hz - VR(Quest 2) GarbagePoster™
March 2, 20215 yr On 2/24/2021 at 4:15 AM, OzWhitey said: 1000 frames per second? Sir, this is Avsim. No flightsim user needs more than 20 fps, the human eye cannot detect more than this! 😉 So good luck with 20fps VR experience in MSFS (or any other game that is) 🤮 CPU: Ryzen 5800X3D not OC, MB: MSI Tomahawk B450, RAM: 32GB DDR 4 3600, GPU: Geforce 5070 Ti not OC, 2TB SDD, Res: 4K
March 3, 20215 yr On 3/2/2021 at 6:05 PM, chatman said: So good luck with 20fps VR experience in MSFS (or any other game that is) 🤮 Whilst the human eye is perfectly content with 12 FPS, I agree that the human stomach is not. Oz Sim Rig: MSI RTX3090 Suprim, an old, partly-melted Intel 9900K @ 5GHz+, Honeycomb Alpha, Thrustmaster TPR Rudder, Warthog HOTAS, Reverb G2, Prosim 737 cockpit. Currently flying: MSFS: PMDG 737-700, Fenix A320, Leonardo MD-82, MIlviz C310, Flysimware C414AW, DC Concorde, Carenado C337. Prepar3d v5: PMDG 737/747/777. "There are three simple rules for making a smooth landing. Unfortunately, no one knows what they are."
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.