August 9, 20214 yr I have done a few RNAV approaches in the TBM 930, and the glide path is kinda erratic. I am approaching from a level altitude as per the chart and the purple diamond almost seemed to engage but then it jumped to the top. It shouldn't behave like that. I have not tried the G1000 but it may do the same. Greazer. http://youtube.com/c/Greazer
August 9, 20214 yr The G3000 still uses totally stock nav, autopilot, and flight plan management, so unfortunately those issues are going to be on the sim end. We'll be moving the NXi nav stuff over to the G3000 at some point though, after we get it really dialed in. -Matt
August 9, 20214 yr on the topic of g3000, i'm unable to turn off svt in the pfd for some reason, is this expected for v0.7.4? R9-9950X3D 32G | RTX5090 | 3T m.2 | Win11 | vkb-gf ultimate & pedals | virpil cm3 throttle | tm boeing yoke | pimax super uw | DCS
August 22, 20214 yr I am having all sorts of issues trying to get the WT G3000 do RNAV approaches with glidepath guidance. I can get these to work with the default G3000 (kinda the glideslope diamond gets stuck but works eventually) but it seems to be much more of a hassle with the WT version. What happens is that I load everything up as I have been doing with the default G3000 but the glideslope doesn't seem to activate when using the WT version and I get other errors to do with flight plan desynchronization whatever that may mean. I think I will just give up on the WT G3000 until the work being done on the G1000 gets ported over. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks. Bruce Bruce Bartlett Frodo: "I wish none of this had happened." Gandalf: "So do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us."
August 22, 20214 yr 10 hours ago, brucewtb said: I think I will just give up on the WT G3000 until the work being done on the G1000 gets ported over. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks. I think you have the right strategy.. it is a work in progress. 🙂 Fly the WT G1000 nxi if you want to fly RNAV approaches, or stick to ILS approaches in the G3000, for now. Bert
August 22, 20214 yr Knowing that the WT g3000 is still a work in progress (or the RNAV GS integration for FS in general) I still prefer it over the default version when flying the TBM. I find it to be a great tool in many respects. However, at this time, I never expect an RNAV GS to function as coupled. I make sure I'm at the proper height and engage APR "just in case" I hit one of the few that does. When it engages, I smile. When it doesn't, I simply follow the step-down on the charts - haven't had any issues with the RNAV approaches. Randall Rocke
August 22, 20214 yr 3 hours ago, Bert Pieke said: I think you have the right strategy.. it is a work in progress. 🙂 Fly the WT G1000 nxi if you want to fly RNAV approaches, or stick to ILS approaches in the G3000, for now. Same strategy here too .. the NXi is developing nicely, .. look forward to the next update Intel i7 - 9700K @ 3.60 GHz | Asus RTX 3080 | 32 GB RAM | Saitek ProFlight Yoke System and Rudder Pedals | X-Touch Mini | Honeycomb Bravo TQ
August 22, 20214 yr Author Yet we can only wait. I think WT want to get it 100% or close to in the G1000 before moving code to the G3000. So for now RNAV approaches in the G3000 are a no go. http://youtube.com/c/Greazer
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.