16 minutes ago, Dominique_K said:

On the contrary, the probability is high that it will. Resources applied to add one new element, whatever it is, will not be applied to solve the  basic pending issues.   

So what will they remove when they add Air Racing? Aileron control? Temperature?

 

1 minute ago, espent said:

So what will they remove when they add Air Racing?

 

Just a little credibility.

4 minutes ago, 6297J said:

Just a little credibility.

Adding a stop watch removes credibility?

Interesting, the assumption people are making is the Reno addon incudes aircraft -  is there any evidence for that ?  I would have thought the addon would be just Reno and the aircraft would be separate? 

With regard to all the political stuff basically saying they should sack all the people working on addons and fix the issues some people are having trouble with instead ... all I can say is "my selfish attitude is that with MY OWN  sim working flawlessly I am more them happy for them to spend as much money as they want on addons, let them eat cake  " .

 

 

30 minutes ago, 6297J said:

Just a little credibility.

Did FSX having similar content reduce it's credibility?

This sim is for all kinds of flying. Not just the kind you like.

Edited August 25, 20214 yr by Tuskin38

6 minutes ago, Glenn Fitzpatrick said:

is there any evidence for that ?  I would have thought the addon would be just Reno and the aircraft would be separate? 

https://www.polygon.com/22637999/microsoft-flight-simulator-stihl-national-championship-air-races-p-51-sea-fury

 

Great, WOWW - a Junkers is coming to MSFS..😎😍

cheers 😉

12 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

https://www.polygon.com/22637999/microsoft-flight-simulator-stihl-national-championship-air-races-p-51-sea-fury

 

Interesting, I have seen a Sea Fury in real life, massive aircraft, the engine towered way above my head ... no way I would have tried to fly it, the thing scared me.

18 minutes ago, espent said:

So what will they remove when they add Air Racing? Aileron control? Temperature?

 

You play with words. This  is a question of resource allocation. If you assign people to a certain task, they are not available to do another task.  If a developer works on modeling the flight of the volocopter 🤦‍♂️ (so neumanish...) or better of a racing Mustang, he/she doesn't work to improve the Caravan. If he/she works on organizing the AI to race, no work is done by the same on the normal  AI traffic and ATC.  I don't believe  that the teams are rigidly allocated. If a developer may have special skills, money a.k.a. wages has not. 

I have nothing against Air Racing. Actually some of my most flown aircraft in FS9,  FSX and P3D were I guess the P-51 and the Texan. I know one thing or two about flight simulation  warbirds and love them.  If the idea is get a half-baked version, as many things coming from the team unfortunately are, I am not interested.

You see,  I have not the faith. Sad. I am just a selfish consumer who wishes they finish the product which has been released last year and correct the new issues they brought along the updates . I see the glass half full, oh yeah I do, I just wish it was full to the brim 😉. 

6 minutes ago, Dominique_K said:

You play with words.

I said "It is not like adding gaming elements will take away the sim elements."

The you replied the the probability of that happening was high.

Where is the play?

Just now, espent said:

I said "It is not like adding gaming elements will take away the sim elements."

The you replied the the probability of that happening was high.

Where is the play?

I am afraid the conversation will stop here. Not interested to pursue it with you.

28 minutes ago, Dominique_K said:

am afraid the conversation will stop here. Not interested to pursue it with you.

I wish more people would take that stance, then we wouldn’t have to Wade through pages of rubbish. Infighting. Handbags at ten paces. And to top it off, know it all’s! 

1 hour ago, Dominique_K said:

You play with words. This  is a question of resource allocation. If you assign people to a certain task, they are not available to do another task.  If a developer works on modeling the flight of the volocopter 🤦‍♂️ (so neumanish...) or better of a racing Mustang, he/she doesn't work to improve the Caravan. If he/she works on organizing the AI to race, no work is done by the same on the normal  AI traffic and ATC.  I don't believe  that the teams are rigidly allocated. If a developer may have special skills, money a.k.a. wages has not.

That's not how development works at asobo from what we know. They have separate teams working on separate projects, they're not taking resources away from anything.

Edited August 25, 20214 yr by Tuskin38

9 minutes ago, Tuskin38 said:

That's not how development works at asobo from what we know. They have separate teams working on separate projects, they're not taking resources away from anything.

Your guessing!!!

You only know what leaks out or they choose to tell you.

If there are "teams"  why is it taking months to get stuff working???

I mean Reno Air Races when the AP and G1000 are a mess just for starters.

Take the RENO team and put them on the G1000!!!!!

Crazy!!!!

Edited August 25, 20214 yr by tpete61

8 minutes ago, tpete61 said:

and G1000 are a mess just for starters.

They have a dedicated team for the Garmin systems, Working Title, check the free section of the marketplace for an open beta for the G1000nxi..

Edited August 25, 20214 yr by Tuskin38