October 6, 20223 yr Resolution 1600 x 900. 1050 graphics card. He's getting 40 fps plus. The display presets (easy, medium, hard) are not well translated from the Italian. Probably high end, medium, low ? ------------- Â 5800X3D, RTX4070, 600 Watt, one or two 1440p 32" screens, 64 GB RAM, 4 TBÂ PCle 3 NVMe, Warthog throttle, VKB NXT EVO stick, Honeycomb Alpha yoke, CH quad, 3 Logitech panels, 2 StreamDecks, Desktop Aviator Trim Panel. Crystal Light VR. Â
October 6, 20223 yr low settings still looks better than xplane 12 on max settings 😛 Edited October 6, 20223 yr by steve 86   Â
October 6, 20223 yr i have been flying in VR for years with Rift CV1 on a similar 'low end' (by today's standards) system (i7 980x. 16Gb RAM, GTX 1050) on med-high settings without too much complaining.  Antoine v Heck --- Ryzen 5800X3D, 32Gb DDR4 RAM@1600 Mhz, RTX3090 (24GB VRAM). 2TB SSD - VR with Quest 2 via link cableÂ
October 6, 20223 yr But that's with a default aircraft and no AI traffic at all! Try landing at KJFK (preferably on the 31's), with bad WX and reasonable AI. Edited October 6, 20223 yr by Luis Hernandez Best regards,Luis Hernández Main rig: self built, AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D (with SMT off and CO -50 mV), 2x16 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, Nvidia RTX 5060Ti 16GB, 256 GB M.2 SSD (OS+apps) + 2x1 TB SATA III SSD (sims) + 1 TB 7200 rpm HDD (storage), ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS air cooler, Viewsonic VX2458-MHD 1920x1080@120-144 Hz (G-sync compatible), Windows 11. Running P3D v5.4 (with v4.5 scenery objects as an additional library, just in case), FSX-SE, MSFS2020, MSFS2024 and even FS9! Lossless Scaling for all my sims. What a godsend...Mobile rig: ASUS Zenbook UM425QA (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H APU @3.2 GHz and boost disabled, 1 TB M.2 SSD, 16 GB RAM, Windows 11 Pro). Running FS9 there .VKB Gladiator NXT Premium Left + GNX THQ as primary controllers. Xbox Series X|S wireless controller as standby/mobile.
October 6, 20223 yr 6 hours ago, steve 86 said: low settings still looks better than xplane 12 on max settings 😛 🤣🤣🤣 i5-12400, RTX 3060 Ti, 32 GB RAM
October 6, 20223 yr He's got a better rig than the potato that I was running MSFS on when it first came out ! G Gary Davies aka "Gazzareth" Simming since 747 on the Acorn Electron
October 6, 20223 yr 8 hours ago, steve 86 said: low settings still looks better than xplane 12 on max settings 😛 Sad but true. Meyer should sell it to get the investment it needs. We need competition.
October 6, 20223 yr My notebook has a 1050ti and runs MSFS on medium in 1080p no issues while looking nice. MSFS does not require insane horsepower thanks to the modern engine and the fact it has to run on an XBox. Other sims though require insane horsepower, look badly and run like horse poo. Laminar Research customer -- Asobo/MS customer -- not an X-Aviation customer - or am I? 😉
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.