Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
seamaster55

New licence details for p3dv6 on their website

Recommended Posts

I am always connected to the internet, I assume if one wants live weather (or using navigraph) - connection to the internet is needed. 

Heck, I am on PE network, so I need net connection all the time.  No net connection means, omg in my house (at times, it is like end of the world....)

I do know situations where users are offline, and they will have to plan accordingly.  I don't even think I can even use MSFS2020 without net connection.

Honestly nothing really changed...can't wait for a new sim (yay)

 

Edited by Skywolf
  • Upvote 3

Active Pattern: MSFS2020 | In Long term Storage: Prepar3d  

How I Evaluate Third Party Sim Addon Developers

Refined P3Dv5.0 HF2 Settings Part1 (has MaddogX) and older thread Part 2 (has PMDG 747)

Share this post


Link to post

Agreed Skywolf. My assumption here would be that LM is trying to deter their business clients from refusing to pay for the appropriate license fee. I would think most people in their homes would have an internet connection.

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, Skywolf said:

I am always connected to the internet, I assume if one wants live weather (or using navigraph) - connection to the internet is needed. 

Heck, I am on PE network, so I need net connection all the time.  No net connection means, omg in my house (at times, it is like end of the world....)

I do know situations where users are offline, and they will have to plan accordingly.  I don't even think I can even use MSFS2020 without net connection.

Honestly nothing really changed...can't wait for a new sim (yay)

While true that it's not an issue for 99% of users, it still leaves a bad taste in one's mouth when it's purely for DRM (MSFS requires a connection, but the user gets something out of it) and they kept the watermark. This is a regression, albeit a small one, compared to V5.

Share this post


Link to post
6 minutes ago, chapstick said:

While true that it's not an issue for 99% of users, it still leaves a bad taste in one's mouth when it's purely for DRM (MSFS requires a connection, but the user gets something out of it) and they kept the watermark. This is a regression, albeit a small one, compared to V5.

At least for my purposes, that small regression saves me $140 😊. I never felt comfortable with the academic caveat in the license.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post

So who says they are not trying to compete with MSFS then? This could be interesting. I wonder what part if any Unreal Engine played in this?

There is a video too:

 

Edited by FBW737
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

having looked at the video I think I can answer my own question. It still looks like FSX out of the box.😒

Share this post


Link to post
8 minutes ago, FBW737 said:

So who says they are not trying to compete with MSFS then? This could be interesting. I wonder what part if any Unreal Engine played in this?

There is a video too:

 

Nothing that you're saying has any relation whatsoever so what Lockheed has shared regarding the licenses. Nothing they stated has anything to do with competing with MSFS or the Unreal engine. 

Share this post


Link to post
1 minute ago, chapstick said:

Nothing that you're saying has any relation whatsoever so what Lockheed has shared regarding the licenses. Nothing they stated has anything to do with competing with MSFS or the Unreal engine. 

So what! In any case if you think that the license change has nothing to do with competing for a share of the home user market i.e. closing the barn door after the horse has already bolted be my guess. I'm entitled to my opinion too.

Share this post


Link to post

"No perpetual cost"...I wonder what would that mean. My English is not good enough for that.


Best regards,
Luis Hernández 20px-Flag_of_Colombia.svg.png20px-Flag_of_Argentina.svg.png

Main rig: self built, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X with PBO enabled (but default settings, CO -15 mV, and SMT ON), 2x16 GB DDR4-3200 RAM, Nvidia RTX3060 Ti 8GB, 256 GB M.2 SSD (OS+apps) + 2x1 TB SATA III SSD (sims) + 1 TB 7200 rpm HDD (storage), ID-Cooling SE-224-XTS air cooler, Viewsonic VX2458-MHD 1920x1080@120 Hz, Windows 10 Pro. Runing FSX-SE, MSFS and P3D v5.4 (with v4.5 default airports).

Mobile rig: ASUS Zenbook UM425QA (AMD Ryzen 7 5800H APU @3.2 GHz and boost disabled, 1 TB M.2 SSD, 16 GB RAM, Windows 11 Pro). Running FS9 there... sometimes on just battery! FSX-SE also installed, just in case. 

VKB Gladiator NXT Premium Left + GNX THQ as primary controllers. Xbox Series X|S wireless controller as standby/travel.

Share this post


Link to post

No academic anymore, now "Personal". 


i9-13900K | 6400MHz DDR5 (32GB) | GeForce RTX 4090 24GB | ViewSonic 27in QHD VA 165Hz Curved | Windows 10 |

MSFS Premium Deluxe | PMDG 737 | PMDG 777 | Horizon 787-9

Marc

Share this post


Link to post

To avoid the obnoxious and petty watermark (and look cool « ya know, me, I am a real simmer so I bought the pro version »), one had to fork out 140 USD more, for v6 it  is going to be 290 USD (two hundred ninety, yep ! ).

Inflation !


Dominique

Simming since 1981 -  4770k@3.7 GHz with 16 GB of RAM and a 1080 with 8 GB VRAM running a 27" @ 2560*1440 - Windows 10 - Warthog HOTAS - MFG pedals - MSFS Standard version with Steam

 

Share this post


Link to post

Surely this change reflects the desire of LM to compete with MS2020 in the non commercial space or at least to keep what is left of its non commercial/professional user base.  I mean in my case there is no way I would spend something north of 250 AUD for P3Dv6 but if all my Orbx scenery etc and my long haul airliners are ported over with a minimum of fuss I just might spend 90 AUD on v6.

Bruce

  • Like 2

Bruce Bartlett

 

Frodo: "I wish none of this had happened." Gandalf: "So do all who live to see such times, but that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us."

Share this post


Link to post

I am curious what the internet connection is for. As some say, it may be for weather or navigation functionality, but apparently the Professional version can work in an "disconnected environment". Presumably that version would have as good or better weather and navigation features as the academic version, even whilst disconnected.


Ian S

38.jpg

Share this post


Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
  • Tom Allensworth,
    Founder of AVSIM Online


  • Flight Simulation's Premier Resource!

    AVSIM is a free service to the flight simulation community. AVSIM is staffed completely by volunteers and all funds donated to AVSIM go directly back to supporting the community. Your donation here helps to pay our bandwidth costs, emergency funding, and other general costs that crop up from time to time. Thank you for your support!

    Click here for more information and to see all donations year to date.
×
×
  • Create New...