What didn't I mention?

And what has this to do with the Concorde ??
I wrote that I no longer remember who it was, but I have since found out.

 

See here side is in German:

https://www.simflight.de/2025/12/05/neue-informationen-zur-aero-dynamics-dc-10/

cheers

Edited February 15Feb 15 by pmplayer

21 minutes ago, pmplayer said:

What didn't I mention?

And what has this to do with the Concorde ??

Your signature banner shows you as a Virtual Concorde Pilot. 😕

On 2/13/2026 at 4:15 PM, St Mawgan said:

GA only here but I am strangely and uncharacteristically tempted by the 737-600. I wouldn't fly it as an airline pilot though 😉 

I dabble in airliners as I enjoy the systems and the navigation. 

The 737-600 for MSFS 2024 is twenty-five squid which makes it an absolute bargain for a study level aircraft that's great fun to fly and in terms of fps performs wonderfully on my system - akin to something like the stock C208 caravan.

I don't have Navigraph, I don't use simbrief nor atc and I don't have any interest in watching passengers boarding.

I use 2024's excellent flight planner to work out a route and programme it into the fmc myself.

It's a great plane, thoroughly recommend it.🫡

47 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

Your signature banner shows you as a Virtual Concorde Pilot. 😕

Sorry i can`t follow you, and yes it does 🤔 but what has that to do with the DC-10 ?

Because you quoted this :

I would like to see a DC-10, and from some Developer there was one in the pipeline ( seeing a long time ago ) but don`t know anymore who - and I haven't heard anything about it for a long time...

 

cheers 😉

Edited February 15Feb 15 by pmplayer

3 minutes ago, pmplayer said:

Sorry i can`t follow you, and yes it does 🤔 but what has that to do with the DC-10 ?

With you being a fan of Concorde I would have thought you'd include that aircraft in your wish list. Nothing to do with the DC-10.

17 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

With you being a fan of Concorde I would have thought you'd include that aircraft in your wish list. Nothing to do with the DC-10.

AHH OK, now i understand, yes maybe i should but which one, the only professional one was/is from FSLabs but seems they missed the MSFS Train, not knowing if they ever jump on MSFS with there Concorde ??

But yes for a good professional Concorde i would give a lot - but for the time beeing i fly the DC Design Concorde, not that professional but not real bad, in some way it sets up the "flying a Concorde feeling" and thats somehow OK - so what can we do there isn`t any better for MSFS.

But yes for the wish list..

cheers 😉

Edited February 15Feb 15 by pmplayer

MD-80 with Analogue Gauges

DC-8, DC-10, CV-990, B58, 717, Mercure, VC-10, Concorde,...

1 hour ago, pmplayer said:

AHH OK, now i understand, yes maybe i should but which one, the only professional one was/is from FSLabs but seems they missed the MSFS Train, not knowing if they ever jump on MSFS with there Concorde ??

There’s absolutely no news whatsoever about Concorde for MSFS. Why they can’t just give an update on progress or even state they’re working on it beggars belief. The only indication has been an outside shot of the aircraft with MSFS showing as the sim. That was over a year ago.

I’ve been flying the version for P3Dv5 and it is excellent. But that means using a different sim which may not appeal. Although the DCD Concorde is a reasonable offering it doesn’t have the system depths of the FSL version. But it is better than nothing.

8 minutes ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

There’s absolutely no news whatsoever about Concorde for MSFS. Why they can’t just give an update on progress or even state they’re working on it beggars belief. The only indication has been an outside shot of the aircraft with MSFS showing as the sim. That was over a year ago.

I’ve been flying the version for P3Dv5 and it is excellent. But that means using a different sim which may not appeal. Although the DCD Concorde is a reasonable offering it doesn’t have the system depths of the FSL version. But it is better than nothing.

Yeep, absolutely, maybe this one shot is the only hope for MSFS..

And that is what i realy don`t like on FSLabs : There comunication to the community is somewhat lazy or almost not intact at all. You can also read in the forums that the replies are rather poor when something is brought up there.

Their updates are another thing, it always takes forever for something to happen..

To say, i flown this Concorde on my FSX days and i loved this Product realy well but a long time is gone and seems a lot changed, but what ultimately remains is that she may still get her chance to fly in MSFS - hopefully !

cheers 😉

I remain keenly interested in the FSLabs Concorde for MSFS (though the wait for it may be long and arduous). I was extremely fond of it in my FSX days.

I do not own the DC Designs Concorde, which is a decent one in its own right, but I was spoiled by the perfection of the FSLabs one, just as we have been in the 737 department..🙂…

Cheers…!

1 hour ago, Ray Proudfoot said:

There’s absolutely no news whatsoever about Concorde for MSFS. Why they can’t just give an update on progress or even state they’re working on it beggars belief. The only indication has been an outside shot of the aircraft with MSFS showing as the sim. That was over a year ago.

I’ve been flying the version for P3Dv5 and it is excellent. But that means using a different sim which may not appeal. Although the DCD Concorde is a reasonable offering it doesn’t have the system depths of the FSL version. But it is better than nothing.

I'm pretty sure someone just took DC designs conc in msfs and put a fslabs livery on it. 😞

I figured this wishlist would have a new 787 on it so one doesnt need to get premium deluxe

9 minutes ago, Sweetd31 said:

I figured this wishlist would have a new 787 on it so one doesnt need to get premium deluxe

The QW 787 was the longest ever wait for a new release for me in FSX days…had purchased it on day one (or two); you can tell from my username…🙂…

I don’t think I have now the patience to wait that long, but, yes, a so-called “study-level” 787 would be highly welcome in MSFS.

I fly the MSFS 787 a lot, but still, a better 787 from a 3rd-party (premier) developer is desirable.

I enjoyed flying the Quality Wings 787 in P3Dv4. The systems and options were not quite as extensive as those in my PMDG aircraft, but the ground handling, flight dynamics, visuals, and sounds were all top notch. It is a shame that Quality Wings seem to have departed to the great software developer graveyard in the sky 

2 hours ago, P_7878 said:

I remain keenly interested in the FSLabs Concorde for MSFS (though the wait for it may be long and arduous). I was extremely fond of it in my FSX days.

I hope you’re a young man. Although I joked on their forum about hoping it arrived before I popped my clogs it did eventually arrive for P3D after several years of development.

And that was with a stable P3D platform. How on earth they cope with the shifting sands of MSFS must be extremely difficult. Maybe they’ve decided it’s not worth the effort. Just my guess. I have no inside knowledge. Just years of knowing how they operate.