klamal

An even better question is, why do so many people that have absolutely no idea when a product will actually release come in here and give their predictions on when it will be released. These predictions, together with a couple of dollars, will get me a ride on a city bus. That's about all they're good for.

Thank God common sense is returning!!!

I've been wondering this myself. I was really looking forward to this aircraft.

That's excluding democrat run US cities, right? LOL

I am sorry to be picky here. Maybe your intent was not to match actual aircraft that the airline operated. If so, please ignore this. But, I used to work for Midwest (Express) Airlines in KMKE. To the best of my knowledge, we never operated any Airbus aircraft. You could maybe argue that after with the merger with Frontier, but I think that's a stretch too. Anyway, again, I'm not trying to be rude here. They are great pics and seeing the colors of my former airline always brings back great memories of a wonderful airline and place to work! We were once "The Best Care in the Air"!

So that's still with Steam installed on the same computer as flight sim, right? What if you were to install LSFG on a separate computer with Steam and then copy the LosslessScaling.exe to the flight sim computer(No Steam installed at all) and run it that way? In other words, not installing Steam at all on the flight sim computer but still running the LosslessScaling.exe on the flight sim computer.

This is my hesitation in buying this program. I don't want to have to install Steam. I wonder if this can be installed on a separate computer with Steam and then "extracted" out to the flight sim computer and ran outside of Steam? I'm guessing by the way Alti's statement is worded that this is not possible? I'm not a Steam user so I'm not sure how that part works.

At what resolution? I run at 4K. I have the same processor as you.

Settings in the sim do not matter. You can configure the sim however you want.

For those with a 4090 already that are saying why would we want to use this with one, what settings are you using? Since SU15, I can't get a smooth experience at all with my 4090. So, I'm thinking I may give this a try. But, I'd be happy not to if I could just find the settings to get it running smooth without it.

If I'm understanding this tool correctly, I think what it's doing is it is actually "jumping in the middle" of what the sim is generating for an image to the graphics card and what the graphics card actually gets. So, the sim is going to do whatever we configure it to do based on in game settings. Then, instead of that just going directly to the GPU, it gets intercepted by this tool. This tool does its own processing on top of what the sim already did and then it is what actually outputs the images to the GPU/screen. I don't know if that's technically what's happening or not. But that's how I picture it in my mind. Because he says in the video that this is essentially a screen capture application. So, it's capturing the output from the sim then doing its own magic and then ultimately outputting the image to be displayed to the GPU w/ its additional frames spliced in.

Yes. It will work with P3D v4. Yes, point the config at the resample from the P3D v4 sdk(though I think it would work w/ earlier versions too but you might as well just use the latest version of the sdk).

Ah, ok. I see what you're saying now. You win! (Kind of :)) Though I think in this particular case, it's probably easier to continue on with the code base that has already been working with than to try to start generating kml files and using those. That's better left to another application I think as the process used by this app doesn't need another way to get this data. It already is doing that on its own. You're right. It could have been made to use FSET. But this was originally developed for XP and is now being made to generate ESP photoreal. So I think it's already too far down the line to make it worth while to switch now. As I said, it's already doing the portion where kml/FSET would be needed in its own way. So why go back? Or am I still not on the same page as you yet? :)

You and I have much different definitions of simple. LOL. Well, actually, you're right...it's not hard to draw lines. But try doing that for entire continents!! That's a lot of patience. And patience is definitely a virtue that I lack! :) This application figures that all out for you...at least in regards to water masking. Maybe you are trying to do more yet?

Maybe so. I've used FSET myself so I agree. That works. However, it is nowhere near as simple in my opinion as this app is. Whether it's re-inventing the wheel or not, it's doing so in an easier way for us users.