ddk
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by ddk
-
-
-
hello. I use Joikuspot for connection to internet via my old mobile phone (n93). i can surfing good with pc. But i can access to Vatsim with VRC. i imagine the joikuspot could not access to ip based address such as http://18.9.22.169 addresses i need a bit help, joikuspot did not answer, and will i connect to vatsim with vrc via joikuspot?
-
Alrot made a good 727 and it work good. i use sometimes. the gauges are realistic (built from an 727 technican). Also include VC and has wide view in Virtual Cockpit. MAybe Alrot 727 could take an ward for a freeware at 2003 but not i doon t know. Yes, i say again, Alrot could take an award for a freeware aircraft
-
I notice that keyboard reponds lately nowadays. I m using cable keyboard and even if changed another one this problem occur again. Especially landing and takeoff, i am using control surfacer ( left right, and rudder, and also up down and trims...) via keyboard at my pc. the other computers and laptop works fine. i am using, fs9 at xp sp2. what do you think? is this hardware or spam or dword! something? i have 3 cable keyboard.
-
okay i understand you are right, but i know a controller able their areas if necessery, says pilots go your destination pilot distrection wthin the radio frequency. The situation is, i can not talk this at Vatsim, beacuse Vatsim has so close forum rules. There are a lot of rules at Vatsim. This is good. but, i believe pilots are able to go UTNT airport and an controler able to scope that area, at least give the pilots approachment then mayme hand off them to unicom Okay the question is; Can i fly to UTNT airport at IIVAO or other online traffics? i hope that helpful controllers when online
-
i am not sure, but i know it is flash11 and xp support this. so i am poor, and i use xp and fs2004 I want to explain this again; i minimize the fs9 to taskbar then i read the fs9.exe %2-3 percent of cpu usage. the open my yahoo mails with internet explorer browser so yahoo contain flash, then i look the fs9.exe again i saw every time it is arrised to %47-49 percent of usage. Even if minimized So, i conflict somewhere i don t know. (i also checket at shockwave flash player hardware acceleration to OFF)
-
this is good, i accept to go VFR. But i must say controller have to helpful for the pilots. pilots sometimes want to fly lake, sea, field or newest airport or oldest airport and sometimes those unknown places are not ava'lable at the scope. p'lot can not know. so the controller can direct us to there via visual or IFR or other ways. The point is; If we can go (IFR or VFR no matter) UTNT airport, then this is good idea. If we can not go UTNT airport (or another airport or place) when online this is bad idea for Vatsim
-
-
I notice that flash player kill fs2004 frame rate. i use windows xp and fs9. when i open internet, if the page contains flash then i lost my flight performance at fs2004. Especially this ocurence when i open flash contained pages. Other Office programs (Word execel...) did not effect to FS. it also kill cpu when i open flash contained web page. (i mean there must be conflict somewhere. i mean when i drop down fs9 cpu descent to %2 percent, then i open a page (contains flash) then i see that the fs9 cpu usage accurate %49 percent... so, do i explain my problem to you?
-
easy, i want to fly UTNT airport. at vatsim. but controller did not send me there. People sometimes to want to fly somewhere where there are lakes, land, or wanna use helicopter or something as a glider. then controller give permissin you with on frequency via pilot discrestion to there. or hand off the pilot to unicom if available. so There must be a way to go UTNT airport or takeoff from UTNT on Vatsim. what i want to say this
-
i want to fly UTNT but a controller said to me that airport not Identified. So i flied a lot of time unidentified airports or places around the world. perhaps the controller the controller may send me unicom at that place but he didn t . I see, some controller are not so friendly. it is not good guys. everyone can fly to UTNT. what is wrong i don t know
-
thanks, your all of issues solve my DC-3 problem. i can turn good on the ground nowBut, this time i have a problem. in squawkbox i couldn t use right differeantiel brake! or is there any other easy choice to turn on the ground?
-
i use xp and also i have same problem
-
When i use the Douglas DC-3 on the ground, it did not turn right or şeft. i could only did, move foreward.i also tried to use SHIFT+4 and pull the "TAILWHEEL ON-OFF" but it stucked anddidn t work.so any idea? to turn on hte ground with DC3?thanks
-
hey, how could you turn on the ground. my tail wheel is not working
-
okay, so as your answer, i understand that i need for FS2004 an i7-2600k for atleast 4Ghz. and add 2GB DDR3 ram of 1600mhz and a good videocard and corsair PSU for for use 100% accurated AI traffic (PAI-WOAI-SKJ-WOT). then the system perhaps will able to run 500 ground and air traffic.my be it will be good to try the Ultimate Traffic next.
-
i use vatsim. i think two of them same for online pilots. But there is a other speculation that there is etnic problems at vatsim.so you stucked in a region, and some some of supervisors gona make partisan for their friends and some of supervisor gonna kill pilots as guardin so some of supervisors are not helpful. also one day i forced land out by a pilot via a supervisor who is friend with him. I don t want to give his name
-
you can see ai traffic at online simulatiın but it can get you confused. also i notice, if you you use McAfeee you will have been some trouble at online traffic.i suggest that use vip models for seeing other traffic and get a radar (fsinn has own radar). so i made the radar gauge myself (44nm range)
-
thank you for online traffic advices.also i want to as that which processor is abble to carry 200 ground (sleeping) traffic and 100 on the air traffic as well at 20FPS?are there any suggestion about CPU? so pentium D can not procees 300 ai traffic at 20FPS. need for cpu advices
-
hey waly87, reduce the "flap_sclar" below 1 . try it. then try again landing. so you will be saw your nose up.but i am newbie about flight dynamics. which flaps effect them i don t know (flap.0 or flap.1 or flap.2).If anybody answer wal87's question maybe we can found an a way to correct the flight dynamic of the planehow does the 'lift_scalar' section at flap setting that effect the airplane dynamic?
-
-
say me lykon how was your change. how did a320 effect when landign after changes
-
Thanks again for all answers. so all of answers usefull for me. so it is 'Dynamic issue'.i like wilco airbus and i think it is best but i didn t like aircraft dynamic especially when landing, now as you suggest i am also trying to use so wilco expert mode instead basic.i tried some of freeware a320 at avsim library so i couldn t find perfect air file.in Real, at the airports i saw, most of the 737 and tupolev and attractive airplanes (thay made mostly nose up and nose down). anyway i saw most of the a320 (airliners) landing smoothly and exposes most stabil arrival.now i understand that this is endless dicussion, so i will try airsimmer my first chance, try to use airedit guided as deltava
-
i understand, thanks for most useful informations. i am looking around airport and attent airbus behaviors at the air (approaching and departing). so as you say the wilco nose mostly up departure and drop down when approaching. so i want to change it, may be use airsimmer, i don t know. so i know that on real (at the airport) i saw most of the airbus 320 arrive and landing nose up and smoothly. ( but 737's changing...)you know, as you said, if i mixed them (fde datas) i will got some technical problems. anyway there must be a way to get realistic dynamic sata for a320