Juliett Alfa Romeo

Oh god...

I wasn't even talking about Mr. Neumann (which is bad enough, being who he is), but about supposed MSFS users (new ones? from xbox? I don't know...) who don't understand the problem/do not even use it/think about using it.

OMG that thread...

I am alarmed by two or three things: people who seem to think that daytime weather is the same as night-time weather; people who have not yet understood the problem... and worst of all: the need to explain why this is important!

I'm going to read that thread. Unfortunately I think the target audience "doesn't care".

I wouldn't say that MSFS is a "children's toy" but rather an "entertainment software". Would you agree? I don't see any problem with that.

I haven't tested and don't intend to buy knowing that one day FSLabs will have their Airbus family on MSFS. But I did see the "interesting" FBW.

Are we going to have 5.5?

I have been testing MSFS and although graphically it is a portent when I add the P3D addons I don't find the latter "much worse". -offline ATC (fingers crossed that FSHud works out). -Capability to direct AI traffic to a certain runway. -chaseplane (I can't deal with the MSFS camera system, sorry). -FSLabs... -Historical weather. In the end I ask myself "is it worth abandoning Prepar3D v5.3?" and my answer is "no". And notice, I wanted MSFS to work out in my case. I think it needs more development and two or three addons... despite the good things that are undeniable, it is still not enough (FROM MY POINT OF VIEW). PS: But I insist, P3D v5.3 may be my last P3D.

Delete shaders?

I'd like to see Friday Harbor (from FSX).

Ahahah....

Amazing addon.

You know what I think? with the competition that exists it no longer makes sense all the silence of LM about future versions of P3D. On one side we have marketing and openness to increase or maintain the hype. On the other discouraging silence... I repeat, not justified. Even Laminar is actively showing what they want with XP12. "Stick with us and keep betting on the platform because we will get this, and this and this" or say "version 5.4 will improve this and this and this". It's ridiculous. Nowadays with all the marketing in the competition it's stupid.

Hum... I don't think so... I know this is niche but I would say that MSFS was (is) a sales success. But about that: what would happen "if"? same thing would happen if OrbX stops supporting Prepar3D (via OrbX Central) or even PMDG with their activation system.

Hello everyone. Do you still recommend Steam? And in your opinion are the quality of the airports in the Premium Deluxe version worth?

Is it that difficult or complex to make an EXE for v5?

"Texture Filtering Quality" Standard or Quality. @Gimala

Aerosoft. PMDG. Who wants to be the next banned on my list?

I feel angry because I trusted them. How can I continue to use their products? Yes, "word not allowed" for them all.

I just feel sorry for the money I wasted on them and not on iFly. PS: if I eventually migrate to MSFS I have $100 in my PMDG account but I don't want it, enough of supporting these people. I don't trust them anymore.

A new version without support from the developers (they abandoned us)... So I'm more interested in a 5.4 version than a new v6. Sad... PS: everyone talks about MSFS but... have you seen XP12?

This?

Nice 😃 Here is the latest bgl with exclusions in the military zone: https://easyupload.io/b9fhtu PS:

I need to learn how to add dynamic lights (or something like that...)