hasse29

I am not eager to please as most of people here. Since you ask for the best: Flightbeam FSDREAMTEAM (avoid KLAS, they are soon remaking it) ORBX Taxi2Gate (Seattle and Orlando) The rest is not up there yet in my opinion. Flytampa make good sceneries today, but older should be avoided.

:wub:

One detail no one has mentioned about this airplane that I like, is that you have succeeded to make it look heavy. If you look at 747 on youtube and live, you can see on the ground that she looks very heavy and "clumpsy", a detail that products before has failed. I hope you understand what I am trying to say, I am really impressed and looking forward to this product

It would be more fun to have a camera and see their expression when he put the bag och the desk and said "I would like to do a withdrawal". In the 90's in Sweden once I got a check for 98 öre, that's about 12 cent. It would cost me almost $3 to get those 12 cent. Me and the casher had a lot of fun about that check. She suggested that I called a security company, because of the risk getting robbed if I withdraw everything at once.

If I ever get rich as Bill Gates, I will pay that amount just to see their faces. After ask where my airplane is

Agreeing with Kyle with one note too add. No matter what aircraft you fly, if you lose one engine (or more), you always try to land. That's safety. A pilot don't know the whole scenario why an engine fails. If it's an oil leak, pilot doesn't know if it's bad maintenance or another reason. So you always try to land before all engines is out. But a four engine is always safer than two engine. You can lose three engines and still have one engine with thrust enough for cruise. On a twin, if you lose one, you only got one left, after you got a $100 million+ glider.

I can access it, and I'm in China. Try to update the page. If still not successful, try to do a tracert and see where it fails. http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles-tutorials/trouble/Using-Tracert.html

Stealing your thread a bit here. I like the idea of OC, but I have big issues. I live in China, and it's almost impossible to update it. Liveries works, even though it's dead slow. One livery takes about 30 minutes to download. But updating OC is hell. I downloaded and installed latest version of 777 about 4 days ago. I have tried to update OC since then several times, without success. It close down after 3 unsuccessful attempts.

Gott nytt år - Happy new year - 新年快乐 From 15°C southern China. May the 747 bring a lot of happiness this year

There are still some issues with sode for example. There's a new version out, but airport must be compiled with the new version. You can't just update Sode.

FSDreamteam: Any product is excellent. Aerosoft: EGLL is very good. LIRF have potential to be very good, but need some issues fixed first. Mallorca (latest version) is also good. Flytampa: YSSY is really good, EKCH also. Taxi2Gate: VHHH is good. Don't know if P3Dv3 is out yet. Overland: RKSI, old and only for FSX, but still high class even today.

Thank you for your answer, very insightful. By mathematical standard, they can only predict weather within a few hours with accurasy, three days within an acceptable tolerance of error. When you see a 10 day forecast on the news, their guesses are barely better than your own. But I got some real good and valuable information from all writers here. Thank you.

Thank you for your answer . On long haul, if the airplane have ACARS and wind is way off, is it common that pilots interact on it, or do they let it be as it is?

Thank you for you answer. Of course I know they don't have ASNext in a real airplane. But it would be more accurate if you filled in correct wind during flight also. If used correct, a company could save a lot om fuel money in a long haul, by maybe flying at FL300 instead of FL360 at the end of flight during wind condition. But I am not a pilot, so I don't know, that's why I wondering .

Jag trodde forumet var på engelska (thought this forum was English) Trevligt att stöta på före detta grannar