jtmedina

Yes I did. I even followed this guide. https://microsoftflight.com/en-us/faqs/#troubleshooting It didn't work. The problem is I haven't had any answer from MS and even tried to get in contact via facebook. Apparently they must be very busy?. I got the Maule and the RV and also Alaska so it'd be a shame losing all that content when I paid for it. It seems a problem with the serial, I have no idea why. Thanks for the advice anyway.

No one knows anything?. I have been trying to get in contact with MSFlight to ask for a new key but I haven't had any answer. I guess I lost the content I purchased?.

I have reinstalled Microsoft Flight but when I sign in I get this message I tried this http://steamcommunit...60163767318406/ But didn't work. Sent a email to msflight@microsoft.com but haven't received any answer. I am pretty sure I am signing in with the same account that I used to download and purchase the game in the first place so that can't be the problem. Any ideas?.

I personally prefer water effects in FSX, even not maxed out(mid 2.x settings) water effects look more natural. In Flight it seems less realistic in my opinion. Autogen is better done and performs better on Flight but still FSX overall feels more natural, specially in weather effects and clouds in general. I do like how Flight looks but when I fly in FSX it feels more natural even using stock scenery.

Compared to the stearman for example the Flight model of the Carbon Cub feels simpler and more like a "Basic" plane. My guess is if a deluxe version of the Carbon Cub comes out it will come with a better FM too. I am comparing it with the stearman because I simply love flying it and I think(my opinion) the stearman is the best modelled aircraft in Flight.

Agreed. Actually in many cases it's just a placebo effect. Unless many files are too scattered over the hard drive. It can increase the load times but no more than that.

Flying with a mouse?. 25 years ago, maybe. Right now with all kind of joysticks you can find out there, I see no reason for that.

To override AA go to the Flight.cfg and change these two lines Custom=1 and AntialiasingQuality=0 Now you can create a profile for Flight changing AA and AF in the catalyst or nvidia control panel. It worked for me. I have an ATI 5770

I only ask for planes like the Maule or RV6. Nothing less. It's their game, they can kill it in the best way they want.

It's not a RC simulator. Anyways, keep enjoying your cockpitless planes. I am basically done with Flight. It's very sad how things are turning out. They'd be destroying what Flight simulation meant in the beginning.

I think there is a big difference there. There is no simulation in flying a cockpitless plane while flying with autopilot enabled is still up to you. To me Flight not having cockpit means they kill the simulation aspect.

How could possibly someone enjoy a cockpit less plane?. The more I try to understand it, the more pointless I see it. So you just see the plane from external view all the time ? seriously?. It's not negativity, it's simply I don't get the point. I am almost done with Flight, at least until Alaska comes out. I'll see if they release a plane with cockpit but if not, there is no way I'll buy it.

That's amazing, only one video on youtube(pax east 2012) showing some content about Flight. We are the minority of the minority.

Well. I must be the only one who don't like cockpitless planes then. Besides. During the 1980s there was at least a flat cockpit Despite back in the 80s technology wasn't that evolved at least they tried to make it look as realistic as possible. Nothing compared with these cockpitless planes in Flight. I guess people on this forum support each other...

Then what' the trend now. More cockpitless planes?. 1 deluxe plane every 3 months vs 1 basic plane a month?. I enjoyed the Maule, Stearman, RV6. I found them the way to go. But it seems that trend can change in the future.