medx421

Correct. I glazed over "twin". Sorry bout that 🙂

You are absolutely correct. I completely glazed over "twin".

A2A Simulations. Best in the biz in my opinion. Easy F1 GTN 650/750 integration.

And just for clarification, the LosAngeles_Traffic.bgl file affects road traffic (cars) and not air traffic. If you didn't realize that already.

I'm terribly sorry, it was Aerosoft US Cities Los Angeles that I was thinking of. I actually run both products in conjunction. In that package it is deleteing or renaming the LosAngeles_Traffic.bgl file. I am not sure why you are experiencing the OOM with just megascenery. I have an older system and do not. None the less, unless you are really passionate about road traffic, I would set that slider or manually input it into the fsx.cfg file as zero. It will go a long ways to help especially in an congested area such as Los Angeles.

I'm not at home so I don't know the files off the top of my head, but there are threads on it. Take out or rename to .off the traffic files. Makes a world of difference.

It's definitely SMF. Fortuitous timing that's for sure with this discussion. Will be very interesting to see solid development

Saw a rumor that Imaginesim may be taking on SMF but it was only a single source rumor and nothing official.

Tucson was actually modeled pretty nicely by a small payware group called Cavusim. The did a few regional type airports pretty decently. I have their Reno airport for example. Unfortunately I can no longer find any products available at the familiar online retailers.

Aviasim well, how do we say, couldn't close the deal. They announced several big projects, threw a couple of model images up, and in the end came up short, incomplete and systematically abandoned each one of the projects. I think they eventually, after enough potential customer frustration, they just threw in the towel. In any event, Sacramento is just one of those cities that the flight simulator payware community doesn't find too much value in representing. There are a few freeware offerings in the library. You may find one that suits your taste. ORBX NCA does improve the area but has yet to improve SMF although they say that it is forthcoming in their next service pack. We shall see. Nick

I'm at work for a few days but will get the file to you as soon as I can, likely Friday morning. Nick

I use it and it looks fine however I do not have Global or Vector installed. You're best bet may be to open up the MAIW_AFX_KNLC_Custom.bgl file in Airport Design Editor and insert an exclusion rectangle around the ramp/field. That may help remove unwanted objects. Edit: Just for the sake of it, I did it in 2 seconds. PM me your e-mail if you want the file and I'll send it to you to see if it works. Nick

Ended up having some conflicts still showing joystick and keypress assignments for the trim control in FSX even though I disabled the controllers. I also had FSUIPC reload settings each time. All is working great now. Thanks again for your time. Nick

Thank you Danny, I wish SPAD worked with the cessna trim wheel, but it does not support it like the multi-panel which you use. I will however take a look at perhaps uninstalling the drivers all together and see if that does anything to help. Thank you for your time. Nick

Good deal. Glad they worked for you. I will experiment with your changes too although my display is slightly smaller :-). Nick