Jump to content

fluffyflops

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,393

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

 Content Type 

Everything posted by fluffyflops

  1. fluffyflops
    great stuff. thanks
  2. fluffyflops
    remind again how much the fenix is ?
  3. fluffyflops
    They cant be that talented if this is the result
  4. fluffyflops
    thanks
  5. fluffyflops
    Back in p3d days it looks LM nearly 2 years to acknowledge that bgl data was conflicting with gsx
  6. fluffyflops
    Well after 4 years the 787 doors are still borked. So don't hold your breath
  7. fluffyflops
    somone on here found the issue in 10 mins. again its not rocket science this to spend an hour or 2 testing with some addons. this issues has plauged us in the community for over 10 years now, the lack of basic testing on all addons, wether it be afcads, textures of fan blades, ils freq's, runway numbers etc . its not difficult.
  8. fluffyflops
    common sense says youd test your product with the 5 most popular addons in the community, namely fsiupc, gsx and navigraph. Its not rocket science. It really isnt.
  9. fluffyflops
    thanks
  10. fluffyflops
    The only way youll get the proper callsigns is from an easyJet employee with access to AIMS. Not to mention the winter schedule and shoulder seasons will also come into effect soon.
  11. fluffyflops
    no worries more than welcome. Flightradar is giving you the flightnumbers and the callsign. Let me show you. Todays EGGD-LDDU is the U2 2893 which comes up on your database Firstly. easyJet do not have A321's They have A321 NEOS. Secondly the callsign isnt EZY2893 its EZY17HW your website is giving you the flight number not the correct callsign.
  12. fluffyflops
    im aware of that erich, when i was in flightplanning we used to get a once month or so AFTN from the authorities in SA telling us we owed them nav fees (when we didnt) and we couldnt operate unless we transferred by western union 10000 USD. We just used to ignore it.
  13. fluffyflops
    lekka man. Every time i do my obligitory supernumary flight for work, I normally pick Joburg. I love the place, and no i dont go for the cheap botox !!
  14. fluffyflops
    whats interesting is for years and years aerosoft couldnt get airside access to finish their version, and yet inibuilds have
  15. fluffyflops
    night flights down and back for most, plenty of crew rest 🙂 not mention it keeps claiming the careers of foolish BA pilots. Jokes aside great to finally have a good Joey, theres also some good freeware city stuff at FLIGHTSIM.TO. they need to do Lagos next.
  16. fluffyflops
    they have inputted into the eurocontrol callsign validator to make sure theres no conflict with similar callsigns. the reason its "messed up" in europe is because you have 22 member states of easa/eurocontrol all with their own airspaces. Its not like in america where you have a huge land mass with a few firs under FAA rules.
  17. fluffyflops
    easyjet use alpha numeric callsigns, as well as some flight numbers with 4 digits. They do not use EZY123, nor EZY321 with only 3 letters. so im afriad your easyJet data is using the iata flight numbers, and not the correct callsigns.
  18. fluffyflops
    Read the above patch. It was released too early
  19. fluffyflops
    No it should of been released with that update and aerosoft should of released it without those updates
  20. fluffyflops
    its the fact thats he bought a product he says he cant use, due to it being unopimtised, so is using another version instead, but he is happy with his purchase. its no wonder the devs churn out unfinished rubbish.
  21. fluffyflops
    how can it be a pro if you cant use it with vatsim, and you are using the freeware from orbx. you just bought a product you cant use pretty much. its no wonder the standard of addons is so low when you read stuff like this. we are doomed.
  22. fluffyflops
    they wont. id be quite happy to wager with anyone whos up for it 10 pounds to a charity of their choice that we will get even more server issues once ms2024 drops. This is about money nothing else. They could of fixed the server issues months/years ago by investing in them, but they havnt, they dont want to invest the money in it. It speaks volumes. Ms2024 will be no different, youll see
  23. fluffyflops
    they be you reap what you sow, as a community we have let this happen over the last 10 years by accepting and embracing unfinished tacky products. dont blame the player, blame the game.
  24. fluffyflops
    Correct well done. It's also the same the other way too.
  25. fluffyflops
    dont worry their flagship a330 is still is a complete mess
×
×
  • Create New...