kkbelos

Thanks! I ran Fragtality´s installer and that did the trick.

Unfortunately it doesn´t work in my computer. The most recent installer removed 0.3.8 from my system, but is not giving me the option to remove 0.3.6 test.

Many thanks to ResetXPDR for his continuous dedication to this hobby... for me, this has been the biggest game changer since the launch of MSFS. Finally, no need to continuously tweak, optimize, reconfigure... even if I will continue doing it, because it became part of the game for me😁 Quick question. What is the consensus now about using AutoLOD or DynamicLOD for tubeliners? Some versions ago it was mentioned that probably DynamicLOD was better suited to the predictable flight profiles of the bit passenger aircraft. But I see now some new features in AutoLOD catering to that market too, and everybody seem to be using AutoLOD for IFR flights too. And question for ResetXPDR: how can I uninstall an old version of DynamicLOD (0.3.6 test)? The current DynamicLOD installer allows to remove the "reset edition", but not the older versions.

I checked it several times. It says that I have to run the installer to uninstall the app. But the only available installer is the one for the reset edition, and I no longer have the installer for the non-reset edition. This is the one I want to remove from my system.

Sorry but can´t find the answer in the thread. I have installed now DynamicLOD_ResetEdition. How can I remove the old DynamicLOD app? I don´t have the installer anymore, and if I run the DynamicLOD_ResetEdition installer, I can only remove the new version (Reset) but not the old one...

DX11

Wow great FPS... very smooth, even with the FENIX. Even without adaptative LOD and with TAA render scaling at 120. My RTX2070 has suddenly increased its expected lifespan by several years, I think. Thanks to Seb and the whole team.

Thanks for taking the time to write a thorough answer, I think I understand now where all the buzz is coming from!

I am curious, what makes it so special? I mean, what are the main differences vs the JF planes or the Milviz C310?

By playing with the register a bit you can unlock several additional English voices in Windows, and use them in Pilot2ATC. I have like 7 or 8, more than enough for flight. It´s not a 1-click procedure but if I managed to do it, it can´t be so complex

Hi Dave, I tried and works great. Thanks again for your great support.

Hi I am using latest version 2.6.4.2 Beta 5W. I don't use the speech recognition as English is not my native language and with my accent, it doesn't work well. But with the SayIt+ option, I can manage quite well. Somehow, the request to transit class B airpsace with Sayit+ is not working, I never get an answer. I have tried VFR with and without flight following, tower or approach or center, near the Bravo Airspace border, at the border, inside, using the different sentences, giving a bearing/distance, not giving it... no success. Any advice?

Thanks, I was wondering how to actually start the program without having a microphone connected. At least on my computer, it doesn´t even let you start the app without it. But I think the workaround has been shared in the message just before yours.

Could you please share the workaround to make P2ATC work without microphone? I have looked for it but couldn´t find anything

I think this is the patch those of us in the beta already got some days ago. Now it becomes the stable version. I say this because I got nothing but I am already at 1.29.30.0, having downloaded this patch last week.

I am still puzzled that they have these hiccups. Anyway, good FPS improvement in the A310 for me, and much smoother. Now at similar level as the Fenix or even slightly better in terms of perfo.

Sure, I am sending you the logs from the last 2 flights

Hi Dave, Thanks for your quick support. I saw that there was a new public beta and I downloaded 2.6.3.2 Public Beta 8P 10/30/2022 The problem is partially solved. Now I get vectors when requested, even showing on the map. Unfortunately, at some point ATC stops giving vectors and does not get me to intercept the approach lines on the map. I had some cases where I even overflew the airport without any reaction from ATC.

Thanks for the quick reply. Unfortunately, it´s not working on my side. https://imgur.com/a/NlLtuE4 I tried with visual straight in and with ILS, and I never get vectored. At best, I get cleared for the approach, sometimes I get no answer. Please note that in that flight I had not a squawk assigned in advance. But even when I get one, the result is the same.

Currently in 2.6.3.2 Public Beta 8K 10/20/2022 While flying in VFR, I try to get radar vectors for ILS or visual straight in. I don´t get any vector, and very often, not even an answer. Sometimes I get the clearance for the approach, but no vectors. I have tried - Contacting app, twr, and center - With or without flight plan - With or without flight following and/or flight advisories Normally I try to request it when close to the airport, let´s say less than 20 NM, using the ?+ feature and trying with several sentences to request vectors. Any clue or tip?

Does it mean that we can have both FSLT and AIG in the community folder and the FSLTL injector will pick AI aircraft from both?

What did you do to fix those 2 points?

It works really well, as soon as it starts the aircraft begin to move, and it spawns traffic at the correct altitude (not the case for AIG). Nevertheless the impact in FPS, even with reduced ammount of traffic, is quite big for me. CPU time gets hammered in busy airports. Curious to see why some people report better performance than with AIG. Really looking forward to some optimization, it would become my only AI traffic solution then.

I think in the past Matt Nischan mentioned here in Avsim that ATC and/or AI Traffic was one of the possibilities? Or maybe I dreamt it? Crossing fingers for that. There is no good integrated solution for it outside the sim, and WT have for sure the right background in real life aviation + flight sims to approach the problem correctly.

I think that the best news here for MSFS is not so much who has been hired or for what, but the fact that Microsoft continues to invest and push the platform, and not necessarily in the areas making it more approachable or tempting for the casual gamer, Xbox, etc. but in the areas which make up the basis of an accurate sim. This is in stark contrast to the people arguing that they want to "gamify" it, that it is built around the Xbox and the PC is an afterthought, etc. Not just the hiring of Petrovich, but the onboarding of Inibuilds, WT hiring, and the plenty of open positions related to MSFS in ASOBO. It will take time to get there, yes, but clearly they have the means and the willingness, so it´s just a matter of "when". On the other hand, not sure why some people see the growth of MSFS as a threat to XP. Personally, I was an XP11 user and just used P3D for a brief time, but right now I am convinced that MSFS is "my" future. Nevertheless, XP was always the underdog in this business, even before MSFS, their market share was below that of P3D, and before XP11 even less. It was always used by a reduced amount of people (compared to FS or P3D) who liked some features only available in XP, or did not like some other characteristics of the other sims. And these people will continue with Xplane, as well as the Mac users, Linux users, people who have invested big bucks in XP addons... anyway, apparently XP Mobile was already a big income source for LR so they can take a hit in the desktop market. Maybe Austin has to sell the Ferrari or has to fly the Lancair few less hours per year? But I see no big issue for XP at the end.