ComSimPilot

Hello Patcho! My experience with Ezdok is very good. I has nice shaking effects and I believe its better in terms of performance and latency than Chase Plane, or at least it seems tome. I also have CP and when installed experienced exactly what you describe, so that's why I installed Ezdok. I recommend it.

I agree! A2A made so much work on these planes, both systems and visual wise that it is a pity to not enjoy them anymore and waiting for each one to be released for MSFS if ever... Yes, shaders and lighting and models are better in P3D but a system/realism geek like most of us are is finding enough visual fidelity and much more system realism to keep us satisfied.

Hi Ray, thanks for the question..So far I have only played with the VC and admired the visual work they have done. hope this August I will find the time during my vacation weeks to properly dive into it. It seems like a hard project to master, but I have to do it..it's a pity to sit on my disk so long. I hope I succeed 🙂

Hi all, Just wanted to share an observation. After upgrading my system lately with a capable AMD 9800X3D and 5070Ti, I decided to just use MSFS 2024, X-Plane 12 and DCS from now on and skip P3D. Fortunately the variety of Airliners and GA is good right now. The driver Possibly as for many of you here, the investment in P3D add-ons that I have done in the past decade is easily the highest one in any simulator at least for me, so I felt the need to install again P3D on a separate SSD and see how I feel about it. The biggest driver was the FSL Concorde which I never had the time to fly even though I bought it on release, along with some other great planes (A2A, PMDG and the Majestic Q400). The visual I won't lie, coming from MSFS24, textures and modelling looked more cartoonish in P3D, lower polygon models and photorealistic textures embedded with some minimal reflections. On the other hand, flying even at low altitude gave a more real experience in the sense of sharpening, because all objects on the ground are sharp and more defined in my opinion. Sky and atmosphere also looked in many ways more realistic. Aircraft - MSFS24 Ground - MSFS24 with P3D wins in many areas Atmosphere - P3D Flying Flying the FSL A320 in P3D, seemed more natural to me. The inputs from the side stick are translated to the aircraft in a more organic feel, airbus FBW feels better to me, even though I have not flown the real thing, from videos on YouTube, P3D hand flying seems more spot on. Taxing Taxing feels nicer to me on P3D. Using Ezdok with shaking effects are more persuasive than in MSFS24. Performance Even though MSFS24 has better performance in terms of absolute FPS, it seems to me that fluidity in movement is better in P3D during critical phases of takeoff and landing especially. What is your opinion?

The question for me is, is it worth it over the XP12 version in terms of systems-FM ?

That's terrible...I have invested so much on these videos

As many I guess, I would be interested to know how it compares to the Majestic version in term of systems functionality and accuracy.

GNS 530W + GNS 430W configuration file for Digital Replica - RV-10

GNS 530W + 430W configuration file for Digital Replica - Cessna 310L (Updated for version v1.12)

GNS 530W configuration file for Just Flight - Piper Archer III

GNS 530W configuration file for Digital Replica - Cessna 310L

GNS 430W configuration file for Just Flight - Beechcraft Duchess Model 76

GNS 530 configuration file for Just Flight - Arrow III / Turbo Arrow III/IV / Warrior II

GNS 530 + GNS 430 configuration file for the Dreamfoil Embraer 110 - Bandeirante

Thank you very much guys! That is something solid, so its certainly worth the upgrade +20% or more improvement is a lot. Garret, thank you for providing me with specific scenery load and numbers. It's very important to visualize and justify. I will contact you for more details if I have more questions about your setup Will certainly consider that as a next upgrade..