Jump to content

Harvgordon

Members
  • Content Count

    141
  • Donations

    $5.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

54 Good

About Harvgordon

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Flight Sim Profile

  • Commercial Member
    No
  • Online Flight Organization Membership
    VATSIM
  • Virtual Airlines
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

1,421 profile views
  1. I purchased FF A320U while it was still in beta. I would say the Fenix A320 at the Alpha stage is already more feature-completed than the current FF A320U. FF A320 didn't even model the alternative law nor direct law back when it was released as beta.
  2. Where is this reliable source? Give reference please?
  3. This is insane, as far as I know no one ever modeled the Airbus Auto TCAS in any add-on available on the market. Not even FSLabs. It's something that new buses have, or CEOs with new software revisions. Here is a clip IRL that introduces this system if you want to know. If they are flying it on VATSIM, I don't think we are still far away from a release, I wouldn't be surprised if this surpasses FSLabs someday. Just wonder how much it will be, I certainly hope it's not surpassing FSLabs in that regard...
  4. What do you mean, is it better than X-Plane 11 default airport or worse?
  5. Preview: P3D5 CTD for unknown reason with AMD RX580 Hi there, I have encountered a new CTD issue and it happens several hours during a long haul in QW787. It happens sometime between 1 AM EST to 8 AM EST. I have attached all logs corresponding to this time slot. The error dialog is saying CTD for an UNKNOWN reason. OS: Windows 10 Home 1909 Prepar3D version 5 with hotfix 1 I5-8600K not overclocked at 3.6GHZ AMD Radeon RX580 8GB not overclocked at 1360MHZ. AMD Radeon Driver: 20.4.2 According to the event viewer, here is the error log, please take a look. Thanks. Log Name: Application Source: Microsoft-Windows-Perflib Date: 5/26/2020 7:17:37 AM Event ID: 1020 Task Category: None Level: Error Keywords: User: SYSTEM Computer: DESKTOP-CQHJPB1 Description: The required buffer size is greater than the buffer size passed to the Collect function of the "C:\Windows\System32\perfts.dll" Extensible Counter DLL for the "LSM" service. The given buffer size was 18472 and the required size was 31016. Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-Perflib" Guid="{13b197bd-7cee-4b4e-8dd0-59314ce374ce}" /> <EventID>1020</EventID> <Version>1</Version> <Level>2</Level> <Task>0</Task> <Opcode>0</Opcode> <Keywords>0x8000000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2020-05-26T11:17:37.149936600Z" /> <EventRecordID>660</EventRecordID> <Correlation /> <Execution ProcessID="11688" ThreadID="9640" /> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>DESKTOP-CQHJPB1</Computer> <Security UserID="S-1-5-18" /> </System> <EventData> <Data Name="Library">C:\Windows\System32\perfts.dll</Data> <Data Name="Service">LSM</Data> <Data Name="BufferSize">18472</Data> <Data Name="RequiredSize">31016</Data> </EventData> </Event> Log Name: Application Source: .NET Runtime Date: 5/25/2020 9:41:16 PM Event ID: 1026 Task Category: None Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: DESKTOP-CQHJPB1 Description: Application: Prepar3D.exe Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception. Exception Info: exception code c0000005, exception address 00007FFAAB13137B Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name=".NET Runtime" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">1026</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>0</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2020-05-26T01:41:16.025789300Z" /> <EventRecordID>636</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>DESKTOP-CQHJPB1</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>Application: Prepar3D.exe Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception. Exception Info: exception code c0000005, exception address 00007FFAAB13137B </Data> </EventData> </Event> Log Name: Application Source: .NET Runtime Date: 5/25/2020 7:53:47 PM Event ID: 1026 Task Category: None Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: DESKTOP-CQHJPB1 Description: Application: Prepar3D.exe Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception. Exception Info: exception code c0000005, exception address 00007FFAA75E528A Stack: Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name=".NET Runtime" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">1026</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>0</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2020-05-25T23:53:47.709506000Z" /> <EventRecordID>609</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>DESKTOP-CQHJPB1</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>Application: Prepar3D.exe Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception. Exception Info: exception code c0000005, exception address 00007FFAA75E528A Stack: </Data> </EventData> </Event> Log Name: Application Source: .NET Runtime Date: 5/25/2020 7:25:21 PM Event ID: 1026 Task Category: None Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: DESKTOP-CQHJPB1 Description: Application: Prepar3D.exe Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception. Exception Info: exception code c0000005, exception address 00007FFA8ACE6FA1 Stack: Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name=".NET Runtime" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">1026</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>0</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2020-05-25T23:25:21.852980900Z" /> <EventRecordID>560</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>DESKTOP-CQHJPB1</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>Application: Prepar3D.exe Framework Version: v4.0.30319 Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception. Exception Info: exception code c0000005, exception address 00007FFA8ACE6FA1 Stack: </Data> </EventData> </Event>
  6. Log Name: Application Source: Application Error Date: 5/25/2020 9:41:16 PM Event ID: 1000 Task Category: (100) Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: DESKTOP-CQHJPB1 Description: Faulting application name: Couatl.exe, version: 3.2.0.4336, time stamp: 0x5eb5643c Faulting module name: ucrtbase.dll, version: 10.0.18362.815, time stamp: 0xbea5fce0 Exception code: 0xc0000409 Fault offset: 0x0009e6eb Faulting process ID: 0x3078 Faulting application start time: 0x01d632fdb7959836 Faulting application path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Addon Manager\Couatl\Couatl.exe Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll Report ID: 4fb172b1-f07b-4f8d-bcb7-7a75b41cb2dd Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID: Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Application Error" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">1000</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>100</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2020-05-26T01:41:16.750387900Z" /> <EventRecordID>637</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>DESKTOP-CQHJPB1</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>Couatl.exe</Data> <Data>3.2.0.4336</Data> <Data>5eb5643c</Data> <Data>ucrtbase.dll</Data> <Data>10.0.18362.815</Data> <Data>bea5fce0</Data> <Data>c0000409</Data> <Data>0009e6eb</Data> <Data>3078</Data> <Data>01d632fdb7959836</Data> <Data>C:\Program Files (x86)\Addon Manager\Couatl\Couatl.exe</Data> <Data>C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll</Data> <Data>4fb172b1-f07b-4f8d-bcb7-7a75b41cb2dd</Data> <Data> </Data> <Data> </Data> </EventData> </Event>
  7. Log Name: Application Source: Application Error Date: 5/25/2020 9:41:16 PM Event ID: 1000 Task Category: (100) Level: Error Keywords: Classic User: N/A Computer: DESKTOP-CQHJPB1 Description: Faulting application name: Couatl.exe, version: 3.2.0.4336, time stamp: 0x5eb5643c Faulting module name: ucrtbase.dll, version: 10.0.18362.815, time stamp: 0xbea5fce0 Exception code: 0xc0000409 Fault offset: 0x0009e6eb Faulting process ID: 0x3078 Faulting application start time: 0x01d632fdb7959836 Faulting application path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Addon Manager\Couatl\Couatl.exe Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll Report ID: 4fb172b1-f07b-4f8d-bcb7-7a75b41cb2dd Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID: Event Xml: <Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event"> <System> <Provider Name="Application Error" /> <EventID Qualifiers="0">1000</EventID> <Level>2</Level> <Task>100</Task> <Keywords>0x80000000000000</Keywords> <TimeCreated SystemTime="2020-05-26T01:41:16.750387900Z" /> <EventRecordID>637</EventRecordID> <Channel>Application</Channel> <Computer>DESKTOP-CQHJPB1</Computer> <Security /> </System> <EventData> <Data>Couatl.exe</Data> <Data>3.2.0.4336</Data> <Data>5eb5643c</Data> <Data>ucrtbase.dll</Data> <Data>10.0.18362.815</Data> <Data>bea5fce0</Data> <Data>c0000409</Data> <Data>0009e6eb</Data> <Data>3078</Data> <Data>01d632fdb7959836</Data> <Data>C:\Program Files (x86)\Addon Manager\Couatl\Couatl.exe</Data> <Data>C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll</Data> <Data>4fb172b1-f07b-4f8d-bcb7-7a75b41cb2dd</Data> <Data> </Data> <Data> </Data> </EventData> </Event>
  8. I mistaken QW757 with QW787. I appologize for that. I managed QW787 to work after installing DDU then install the beta version of AMD drivers. However the black screen come back when the HDR is unchecked. However, I have a new CTD issue related to FSDT Addon Manager according to Event Viewer. Please take a look. Faulting application name: Couatl.exe, version: 3.2.0.4336, time stamp: 0x5eb5643c Faulting module name: ucrtbase.dll, version: 10.0.18362.815, time stamp: 0xbea5fce0 Exception code: 0xc0000409 Fault offset: 0x0009e6eb Faulting process ID: 0x3078 Faulting application start time: 0x01d632fdb7959836 Faulting application path: C:\Program Files (x86)\Addon Manager\Couatl\Couatl.exe Faulting module path: C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll Report ID: 4fb172b1-f07b-4f8d-bcb7-7a75b41cb2dd Faulting package full name: Faulting package-relative application ID: I have already added FSDT Addon Manager folder in the exclusion list of Windows Defender.
  9. Hi there, After 3 days of tuning, it's exhausting but finally I'm able to find the culprit of black death screen to P3D V5 If you have entered a black screen (but with engine sounds audible and menu clickable after loading a scenario), your shader and cfg files are corrupted by one of your add-ons. If you have Add-on manger installed. Please take a look at this thread, it's recommended to follow the instructions provided in this thread. http://www.fsdreamteam.com/forum/index.php?topic=15721.0 Since QW787 is titled inside the Add-on manger, I tried this workaround first. To solve this problem (Will deactivate all of your add-ons so it requires a re-installation). 1. Run "Delete Generated Files" inside the Prepar3D v5 directory as administrator (Debugging steps suggested by LM). 2. Empty the "Prepar3D v5 Files" and "Prepar3D v5 Add-ons" folders. 3. Repair your Client and Content installation (right click the msi). 4. Run Prepar3D.exe to let the program build the shader and config files. 5. You will see the black screen is gone. 6. Re-install your add-ons one by one, after a single installation run P3D to check if the issue appears again. Now, after repeating these steps several times. I found ASP3D or QW787 is causing the issue. Since ASP3D is in open beta and no support is provided. I will report this issue to their forum. I didn't find a valid solution to solve the issue permanently. The only way to avoid the issue is do not install these two plugins together. I will upload a video to show this later. Hope this thread help people encountering the same issue as I did. Cheers, G
  10. Hi there, I saw there is a thread discussing this issue with a NVIDIA card, I check that thread and many suggestions provided are NVIDIA based. I wonder if any AMD user is also suffering from this issue because I am. I'm not able to load into the sim. You can see there is a glitch at a first look, nothing is showing in the aircraft profile. This issue on an AMD card is even more severe than a NVIDIA. When the error dialog appears. It disabled the HDMI inputs so your screen will go death black then showing "HDMI NO SIGNAL". There is no way to get the monitor working again except rebooting the PC. My Specs, i5-8600, AMD RX580 8GB Radeon Driver & Software: 20.2.2 Recommended by AMD Windows 10 Home 1909 Prepar3D v5 with hotfix 1 I'm neither overclocking my CPU nor GPU. I use MSI Afterburner and RTSS for information overlay and limit frame rate at 30 fps. Does anyone experience the same issue on the AMD card and please tell me if you have a workaround for this. If you have the same issue we can also discuss it in this thread. Any suggestion is appreciated. Cheers, g
  11. Is the VRAM issue related to reallight and Trueglass? Could somebody please confirm if this is the case?
  12. A debate come from die hard X-Plane fan*boys and hype train parties is not going anywhere. On second thought. OH MAN did I waste the time again?
  13. https://www.facebook.com/rotor.ukraine/videos/199061094569577/ MSFS looks MUCH closer to reality in my opinion.
  14. After reading the statement I am hyped for this! At first, I thought it's just a visual enhancement or typical eye candy. However, they have said they also simulated the icing model with respect to airframe performance degradation, now that's the REAL THING!
  15. Okay, after reading few posts I think we might have a misunderstanding here. I see people blame REX for not drawing the cloud types other than cumulus and cirrus. This is NOT correct. SF3D did have some new cloud types that other texture add-ons are incapable to model in the sim. Because it requires specific weather conditions to see. Under severe thunderstorm conditions where the supercell is formed. The altitude at its top is about 70,000 ft. This screenshot is taken at 70,000 ft. As you can see from the picture, the supercell tower is certainly drawn in the sim. https://imgur.com/OQzvJRv https://imgur.com/B5pbbUU I don't know how to re-create a scenario that other cloud types can be seen. This is why I'm asking REX to make a demonstration. When flying through the clouds, it doesn't really have the "3D" feels, in my scenario, it seems that I am flying through layers of clouds, and it really kills the immersion. Here are the screenshots I have taken during the test. https://i.imgur.com/3ihyVAQ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/AKz47Kz.jpg The key is, SF3D lacks proper weather simulation, which their IWX engine should have the capability as advertised. Yes, it can generate nice-looking supercell tower, but it doesn't have the capability to do the proper weather simulation of it. You don't really feel the danger of flying through these weather conditions. It's just the eye candy. At the same time, when I choose to use ASP4 with SF3D, there are new issues. ASP4 as a weather engine is utilizing the clouds from SF3D, with SF3D enabled (IWX weather engine disabled) in the background. It doesn't seem to work well with the SF3D's real-time sync mode because ASP4 is generating clouds at the same time, it really sacrifices the performance and the weather simulation of ASP4 feels odd as well, not to mention the strange combined looking. You see here SF3D is definitely compatible with ASP4, they can be run at the same time and work together, but it doesn't work well. I know I can not criticise REX developers for this reason because they don't really have a chance to make SF3D integrate with ASP4 perfectly. The development of two products is totally independent. Therefore I can only hope for the best that SF3D's IWX weather engine delivers. The major critics that SF3D has received (in my opinion) is related to its weather engine. If I use nice words to describe it, it still has a large potential for further development. Not to put too fine a point on it, it doesn't have fundamental features to be called as a "weather engine". They use fancy words in the advertisement, such as "we are able to interpret the energy of the atmosphere by using key model components to determine its volatility down to a single latitude and longitude." which indicates they are using a totally different approach to bring the flight sim weather simulation to a higher level. I have never seen any existing weather product is capable of interpreting the energy of the atmosphere, and this is just exciting. However, the questions to be asked after the purchase is: "What is the theory or the background of its weather simulation", "What is the limitation of the software?", "What about sudden weather change and re-draw of clouds?" REX doesn't give us sufficient information in the reality. To be honest, the main reason that I purchased SF3D at an instant was I really believe this brings revolutionary changes and overcomes the sim barrier. Unfortunately, it all comes to a frustration at the end. It doesn't live up to all anticipation and advertisement it has.
×
×
  • Create New...