Jump to content

mpo910

Members
  • Content Count

    2,410
  • Donations

    $15.00 
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by mpo910

  1. Yes.....my experience also. The Nvidia drivers released after mid September where in my case influencing MSFS negatively. So more ctd with newer drivers. I'm not saying that is an Nvidia issue. Just what my experience is and what happens at my end.
  2. Mine neither. People are fearing, loosing everything they have. Usually some people loosing even life or happiness in life. I will not use flights im in Iceland out of my respect to this horrific situation. Just my way of acting and may differ from others.
  3. DX12? Try DX11. Or did you already tried it out? And are you using FSLTL? If yes, you need to move the FSLTL folders out of the community folder (don't know if you have those still included because you wrote almost empty Community folder). FSLTL ctd my sim as soon as I put those folders into my community folder. I have stored them outside and since then no random ctd by FSLTL. And yes.....with 2d no problem, with VR in my case the FSLTL based crashes AND dx12 based crashes increases. I've tested this seprately of course as well together. Now my sim is pretty stable. Old recommended Nvidia driver 531... And FSLTL outside dx12 on. 10 flights and 1ctd. Prior was every second flight a ctd.
  4. This OP mentioned exception code I even got after starting MSFS, with DX12, bought an addon ESSA from ORBX within the MSFS Marketplace and downloaded it. I left my PC back, with MSFS running (downloading) and when I came back, my screen froze and nothing worked anymore. Even my Windows froze. MSFS showed me the "Your Graphicscard has encountered......." poppup message. After Restarting my PC I saw exact the exception code the OP menitoned in the event viewer. So I did NOT used the MSFS map view, did NOT fly and my MSFS CTD with that message. I have a non personal OC iCHILL 4090 watercooled and 7900X3D CPU wich is stable (only PBO 150mhz and CurveOptimizer for my AMD CPU turned to Negative 28). With DX11, non of above issues accoured. Before SU13, also never hat CTD with DX12 and VRAM or Graphiccards issues. I do not think it´s the server issue at my end.
  5. I suggest to roll further back and test with the drivers I have mentioned. In my case it helped to drastically reduce CTD (almost every second flight with newer nvidia drivers and DX12)
  6. I have tried DX11 for weeks (20 flights upwards), and never had a single CTD just to test between them both. In my case, DX12 is the issue for my CTDs. The most stable Nvidia Driver for me was 531.29. And 535.98 the second best. I also prefer DX12 due the smoother experience and less stutters at heavy scenarios, compared to DX11. With DX11 I get up to 70 FPS in VR, with heavy addons and high to Ultra settings, where DX12 gives me 45 to 50 but smoother experience overall. The suggested test, using DX11, is only to check, if you are also suffering from DX12 BETA instability. The High VRAM usage with DX12 is intended, please do not think this is unwandted and faulty! But my CTD with exact the exception code you mentioned, is only occuring with DX12 in my case. Also, DX12 has the ground tile texture flipping issue, with BING texture groundtiles bleeding through at airports etc. Within my test with DX11 I never had that issue anymore. Now I´m on DX12 again and with 535.98 Driver I have managed to be CTD free for at least 5 flights. I think, assumption because I have not documentated this, that every 10th flight I get the error you´ve posted. That´s ok for me at the moment Marcus
  7. Are you using DX12 or DX11? If you are using DX12, try DX11 for the next 5 flights or so. Because, in my opinion, CTD have started to get worse with SU13 release, using DX12 AND the driver versions after 531.29. 535.98 is still pretty stable to me with DX12, but NOT CTD free. I´m on LOD 200 for Terrain and Objects and when flying VR on LODs 175 for both. In VR I get 45 - 60 FPS regardless the scenario within the FenixA320 at DLSS Quality with 37PPD in the Varjo Aero. System specs Edition Windows 11 Home Version 22H2 Installed on 20221014 OS Build 22621.2506 Windows Feature Experience Pack 1000.22677.1000.0 HAGS ON Nvidia Driver Latest Stable for me 535.98 AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | PBO 2 + 150MhZ | CurvedOptimized NEG 28 | SMT ON Mainboard ASUS Crosshair X670E Hero 2x16 GB RAM 6000 Mhz Corsair Vengeance RTX 4090 24GB Watercooled 32" Samsung UHD Monitor @4k Custom Water Cooling | 2x360MM Varjo Aero | Varjo Base Main MSFS Addons Fenix A320 FBW Experimental Mode FSCrew GSX PRO OPENXR Toolkit FSLTL AIGAIM | Latest Version AIGTC | Latest Version PSXT + RealLiveTraffic (not in Use due CTD) +175 Addon Airports | Incl. 5 CityPacks
  8. I´m not sure if you HAVE to (can) or MUST. I think ASOBO adjusted the values, some user say with different parameters. If this means, the "ARPC" Version does not work anymore, I can´t tell you. I THINK it works with SU14 BETA as well, but I did not test this.
  9. So they enhanced the scattering too, not only the RGB. Or?
  10. With a 4090, I managed to use 21 GB VRaM with all settings between High and Ultra and both LODS at 175 in VR with the aero, DLSS at quality. That was during flight and with max 50 FSLTL aircraft injected and the Fenix a320. Just to give you an idea HOW much VRAM MSFS and addons "eat". Since SU13 I frequently managed to get DEVICE HUNG DX12 issue and even this is not an exception sind su13. Before I had a rtx3090 and before su13 there weren't no such dx12 VRAM issues.
  11. Do I need to search my lost glasses so that I can read the whole topic? Or is it better to left my glasses where I lost them? :-). Just kidding here. Thanks for sharing your opinions. And because opinions are just "opinions"......you are all so right here. Due the high rates of posts I must have missed the frame! 😉
  12. I think the vram memory management is a bit more unstable then prior su13. I run at 4090 and and 7900x3d and even at high settings (compared to ultra), with varjo aero, I get more often ctd when going from 2d into VR mode (STRG + TAB) all in dx12. Also since su13 and rtx4090 I get more ground texture bleed through at airport textures. Never had that with su13 and rtx3090. I swapped to 4090 when su13 came out, so I'm not sure what exactly is the cause or if it's the combo. Sim runs incredibly smooth in dx12 and a bit more hickups (very small terrain stutter when panning my head) in dx11. That's why I run at dx12 and try it further.
  13. Yes. Sounds goes on like nothing is wrong and image (video) is paused between 1 and 2 seconds. I've even had 4 seconds roughly already. Always on lower altitudes at the vicinity of an airport. I think within ta least 30nm, most likely closer.
  14. This happens frequently (every 3th flight I guess) to me as well. I,m on a 7900X3D and RTX 3090 and Airport size does not matter indeed. Last time I had this was today at LPMA directly above the prior Island LPPS. Since SU13 this happens and before not an issue. I do also asked myself, if this has somthing todo with GSX Pro loading "verhicles". But thats only a guess and nothing I can or want to proof.
  15. I use a etc 3090 and haven't installed MSI Afterburner, no Nvidia experience filters in use neither. The PC SHUTDOWN issues started after su13.
  16. exactly my issue as well. Completely shutted down my PC and I´m not using FSTL but AIGAIM and Limited at 60% Traffic usage in AIGAIM/AIGTC
  17. Any respectful feedback, wish, bug, problem, issue or something else, from a customer or becoming customer is a chance for a supplier to enhance or learn. My feeling is, that at Aerosoft they understand this kind of input as a Attack or as a try, to tackle their product. But it isn't! As long as they react harsh, ban people or deny our feedback (by always pointing with their finger towards "us")...it will have a negative impact on sales! Sales could be much higher when reacting professional and rational rather then emotional. Of course MSFS has raised their Numbers of sales, no doubt, but it could be higher when they start turning the rudder around and ask them selves : what can we (Aerosoft) do and learn from the customers input? I was surprised how fast I was banned. It influenced my thoughts about their products directly. I treat them respectful and I wished they did this with me as well. I liked their a330 in P3D. But the issues where so big I could not use it at all longer then 45 min. And I did a clean windows install, p3d install and only had a330 Installed to rule out all other software issues. Hardware could still be an issue....but even tests told me that memory RAM CPU and GPU where not the cause. And there where many users with the same issue. They told us, we are a handful users compared to thousands of user who have not this issue. And so they thought....it is not their product. But my assumption is, that even if only few people communicate an issue, it does not mean that there isn't an issue! I won't buy another a330 from them. They don't fit to my expectations regarding to support and product quality (not quantity related to functionality).
  18. I am dutch too...lived there for 20 years... 🙂 A lot of support people at aerosoft are German. I never had such rude replies to my messages as from Aerosoft. And my messages are polite written too.
  19. I owned the a330 in p3d (And I am a P3D Beta Tester as well). The A330 in p3d didn't even handle the daily standards like proper VNaV and laws. It even had a memory leak, which drained fps after 30min of flight down to single digits FPs. I habe written 2 DIN A4 Messages to the support team, uploaded Videos to proof the issue was related to the weather radar (on drained) and contacted Mr. Kok personally on a friendly way (I am a Scrum Master at a huge bank and have experience handling issues and serve a 18 people big software team). Delivering some good footage to point them to the issues....resulted in being Locked at their forums... After my letter to Mr. Kok, he let me in the forum again...but all my posts have to be checked first to get posted public. The support of Aerosoft has huge possiblity to grow and become more user friendly (we bought payware!) And the products are to bugged in my opinion. I'm not having problems with bugs....until they make the product unusable for the purpose (it wasn't able to fly longer then 30 a 45 min) or the bugs don't become resolved AND are being a real bug (function wich does not do what it should do) wich affects every user. Aerosoft is surely not my preferred supplier due this kind of delivering Regards Marcus
  20. I remember prior FSLTL, I used this too and also those CTD. Not from the beginning, but after a while as well. Did you try flying 2 or 3 flights without these both? I would really try it out.... What triggered me in your message was that you CTD after 45 to 60 Min....thats exactly what happend at my end as well. Good luck on finding the culprit....not as easy as it sometimes should be
  21. Are you flying with FSLTL in use? I got the same message, after the same amount of time. When not using FSLTL (also AIG insgtalled and FSLTL will use their models as well), I did not got any issue. My issues where gone, since the latest SU12 Update from MSFS. I had the same issues before installing SU11 as well, and after updating MSFS tu SU11 they went away also, but came back aftert weeks without any CTD. If using FSLTL, try without it a couple of flights. When this is the culprit, I would suggest to uninstall the MSFS app (without reinstalling the official and community folder). Just rename them BEFORE uninstalling the MSFS app, then rename the official folder back to "official" and install the MSFS app new. Regads Marcus
×
×
  • Create New...