Vitold69

They look not more terrible than Air Canada 767 w/WL

The options reset bug is not fixed in the latest beta build. They promising to fix it in the next beta. It reminds me... Yes! And remember there are only 20 days left before SU14 official build release. White bug deja vu 🤷🏻‍♂️

I've found what caused such a behavior. It's Navigraph – Navdata MSFS 2020 AIRAC. If you have it delete from community folder! Default MSFS database ILS works like a charm.

I'm not so lucky. Hit APP button many times. Can't engage APP mode still. When you hit APP second time are you in active LOC stage already? Looks like it's a problem of default 78X and subsequently Kuro and HS.

OK. My bad. Check all ILS at default Asobo Haneda airport. 16L, 16R, 34R, 23 (offset loc) - work as they should. 22 and 34L - don't for unknown for me reason. Glideslope appears too late. This is happening to HS 787-9 as well as default 78X. I have used all the runways ILS mentioned with PMDG 738 without any problem.

I have some troubles with glideslope capture on HS 787-9. First of all I can't engage nor LOC not APP before the plane sense ILS system. Is it right behavior? I don't think so. Anyway when localizer is live I engage LOC plane turns and follow localizer (green LOC mode on PFD). At that time glideslope is well above me. But it doesn't appear on PFD. No glideslope magenta diamond at all. So I can't engage APP mode. It appears right after FAF and usually half or one dot below. This means I missed glideslope and APP mode can't activates. Again - I am catching glideslope from BELOW. This type of approach: At NEXUS I am in active LOC mode. No glideslope appearance until NITRO. Can't engage APP mode. Diamond appears right after NITRO and a half or one dot below catching point. Now I can engage APP but it's too late. Glideslope is missed 😒

I clearly remember the story with "white dot". I hope you too

I bet this bug will be in official SU14 update

Does it mean the ini A320neo has in house beta testing only?

Hmmm... They put iniBuilds A320Neo in SU14 plans. Any traces of the plane in SU14 Beta? I believed it's just a typo.

I see most of us must scroll down Quality Wings manual for their 787 at least. Before jumping in to cockpit. 😇

Looks like our Emi "Now" ThePilot doesn't have Boeing's official software. And never had 😀

So is 5000x5000 your lowered resolution? 🤔

Really? Some prefer more reddish bluish or greenish. Biology mode gave us full control on this.

Does Biology mod work for SU14?

Microsoft/Asobo definitely knows how many copies of MSFS they have sold and how many hardware/CTD complaints they got. And I believe the ratio is allowing them do nothing.

Is it a software or online interface?

There is something wrong with CG/Trim/Weight stations calculations by it's own software. I use it for short hops in Japan using real world timetable. So it's around 300 - 350 pax and 10-12 tons of fuel only. It gives me CG 29-30% calculated by FMC and trim of 3 - 3.25. From my experience I know I need to add 2 - 2.5. And I put it as 5.5 Rotation is smooth at 141, flaps 5 and a huge derate. The rotation technique should be like for Microsoft ATR-72. Slow rotation of nose gear. Lift off then keep a couple of seconds low angle to avoid a tailstrike. Then follow flight directors. To avoid a rocket climb I choose CLB2 always. I have noted two other things. Flare is too long for me. To avoid it I turn off A/T during flare and move levers to idle manually. No heavy nose gear drop for me. If you import a flightplan into FMC and add SID and STAR later it gives you TOC and TOD. If you later shortcut approach FMC doesn't recalculate TOD even if you push execute. It gave me decent rate of 3500 fpm on last flight. Plane is flyable at the moment definitely but CG should be refined.

Better think about Christmas time 😀

We have time to test new PMDG tablet and Horizon 789 meanwhile.

Let's be honest and straight: His "now" and German accent make everybody mad. 😁

Will not be surprised if he is not a pilot at all. It's Internet baby!

Emi "Now" 737Pilot is here again 🤦🏻‍♂️

I do not have any problems with takeoff and takeoff speeds. All data is loaded in using simbrief. I even simulate Scoot capacity and put 360 pax. Simbrief calculates all weights correctly. For short flights I have a high payload but low fuel. So my CG is always around 29-30% and trim is 2.75 - 3.25. Vr is around 147 and flaps 5. Plus a huge engines derate. All data calculated using EFB. I have no problem with rotation at 147 and flaps 5. Not many of us did the full flight I guess. So expect another surprise. On short final when I turn autopilot off plane suddenly gets a high pitch up. To correct this I pull down yoke and get sinkrate and hard landing.🤷🏻‍♂️

What do you mean? In the latest Fenix version I can't see any options for hi res textures. Or do you mean some third party mod?