I am like greenpeace, I do not let tycoons to kid me without complains, that's assured.I also seriously doubt MS will open a MS web site for Flight, for the very same reason above mentioned. Gazillions of simmers around the world would riot seeing Flight so this is enough for them for deciding not to open a dedicated MS web site.

Strange views Mark, very strange...

Thank God "greenpeace" are not in charge of companies or we would be still seeing wire frame buildings...

Hi! thank for the work! One question: is that native FSX or with add-onns?

Hi! thank for the work! One question: is that native FSX or with add-onns?

He does default vs. default.

ok, thank you very much for the info!

I am like greenpeace, I do not let tycoons to kid me without complains, that's assured.

ok, thank you very much for the info!

He does default vs. default.

The only add-on was the freeware stearman...just to make the first shot more legit. :(

Over 5 years passed by meanwhile

Corrected.

Gazillions of simmers around the world would riot seeing Flight

I've got no idea what you're going on about but this made me laugh.

The only add-on was the freeware stearman...just to make the first shot more legit.

And the Baytower Vans RV-7 in the fourth shot right?

Each month, the differences seem to be more and more extreme.

That isn't the impression I get. Whilst MS Flight certainly looks better than FSX, I have to point out that there isn't a vast difference between the MSF/FSX views in Screenshots 1 and 8.

That isn't the impression I get. Whilst MS Flight certainly looks better than FSX, I have to point out that there isn't a vast difference between the MSF/FSX views in Screenshots 1 and 8.

To be honest if I didn't see the Flight write I would struggle really really a lot to spot the differences. Sometimes I would also pick up the wrong one for sure.

The improvement in VC licghting are quite dramatic.Cheers,- jahman.

Thanks for sharing. I do like what I'm seeing in Fligth.Bob