October 12, 20187 yr Hello Folks: When calculating my VREF speed, the EFB and FMS have displayed two different VREF speeds. Today, the EFB was showing a VREF of 166 while the FMS was saying 145. I copied the data from the FMS to the EFB but I couldn't get the two figures to agree. I know...I must be doing something wrong. Thanks. A. Ortega AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor, MSI MAG B850 Tomahawk MAX WiFi Motherboard, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB SSD, Samsung 870 4TB SATA, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition Video Card, Rosewill VMG 1000W 80+ Gold Power Supply, Phanteks XT Pro Ultra Mid-Tower Gaming Chassis, Windows 11 x64 Home, 2.5gb fiber ISP.
October 12, 20187 yr you can overwrite the values in the FMC if you so choose to. Make sure that the conditions for the calculations are correct. My guess your wind is not entered to either or just one. Safe & smooth flying, Clarke Ramsey
October 12, 20187 yr Commercial Member 5 hours ago, Dreamflight767 said: I copied the data from the FMS to the EFB but I couldn't get the two figures to agree. There shouldn't be such a difference. Make sure all the data fields on the EFB are the same as in the FMC. Michael FrantzeskakisPrecision Manuals Development Grouphttp://www.precisionmanuals.com
October 12, 20187 yr 166 is the calculated speed with max landing weight (or at least a calculated higher value.) you need to correct your weight by using the inflight data. I can‘t tell you the exact wording now as I am not at my PC but there is an option in the EFB on the right side when you are on the landing calculation page. ,
October 12, 20187 yr Marc is referring to the fact that there are two landing calculations, Dispatch and Enroute. It defaults to Dispatch, change it to Enroute to calculate landing when you are doing your predescent flows. Dan Downs KCRP
October 12, 20187 yr Author OK. I'll make that change. Thanks. Just out of curiosity, if I uploaded the FMS data to the EFB, why do I have to change from dispatch to enroute? Weight and weather are the same so why does the EFB calculate differently. A. Ortega AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor, MSI MAG B850 Tomahawk MAX WiFi Motherboard, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB SSD, Samsung 870 4TB SATA, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition Video Card, Rosewill VMG 1000W 80+ Gold Power Supply, Phanteks XT Pro Ultra Mid-Tower Gaming Chassis, Windows 11 x64 Home, 2.5gb fiber ISP.
October 12, 20187 yr 31 minutes ago, Dreamflight767 said: OK. I'll make that change. Thanks. Just out of curiosity, if I uploaded the FMS data to the EFB, why do I have to change from dispatch to enroute? Weight and weather are the same so why does the EFB calculate differently. Because the regulations are different. For planning purposes (ie before dispatch) the aircraft must be able to land within 60% of the available landing distance for a dry runway -- this means you take the actual landing distance at the planned landing weight, multiply this distance by 1.67 and this figure must be less than the available landing distance. If it is not you must reduce the weight until it is. For a wet runway, the factor is 1.92. Once you are airborne, however, these requirements no longer apply and all that is required is that the commander is satisfied that a safe landing can be made (ie actual unfactored LDR <= LDA). Simon Kelsey
October 13, 20187 yr Author I see. Thank you for the explanation. Edited October 13, 20187 yr by Dreamflight767 A. Ortega AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D Processor, MSI MAG B850 Tomahawk MAX WiFi Motherboard, Samsung 980 Pro 2TB SSD, Samsung 870 4TB SATA, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition Video Card, Rosewill VMG 1000W 80+ Gold Power Supply, Phanteks XT Pro Ultra Mid-Tower Gaming Chassis, Windows 11 x64 Home, 2.5gb fiber ISP.
May 17, 20206 yr I compute my landing weight for arrival i.e. Predicated Remaining fuel at landing and zero fuel weight. Even doing that I still get a high EFB value than FMS. I also remove the 5 knots for comfort. Vref is supposed to be based on 1.3 Vso PERIOD,....! So what's going on here???? J. Lonchambon Jacques Lonchambon
May 26, 20206 yr A quick cross check for vref I use in real world ops is: flap 30 vref at 240T is 140kts. This speed changes by 1kt per 3T change in landing weight, eg 250T vref 30 is 143kt , 230T its 139 kt 787 captain. Previously 24 years on 747-400.Technical advisor on PMDG 747 legacy versions QOTS 1 , FS9 and Aerowinx PS1.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.