it's out of beta😁 just got the email.

 

https://fselite.net/news/captain-sim-767-captain-ii-now-version-1-0/

 

Developer Captain Sim has today announced that the 767 Captain II is no longer in early access and has reached full release status. Version 1.0 of the aircraft brings with it a large number of fixes and changes, as well as some new features including wing-flex.

The changelog below from Captain Sim seems to be a mix of customer comments, bug fixes and some other oddities (such as a fix named ‘Floating’), but we can see there has been some changes to functions within the aircraft. Some of those changes include fixes with the FMC, VNAV and also some of the navigation data when selecting certain segments of flight. There have also been improvements made to the cost index calculation, EGPWS and also some instrument approaches.

Despite calls from Captain Sim saying that they would increase the price $134.99 once the aircraft was released from early access, the price is still currently listed at $99.76 USD. It remains to be seen if they do increase the price (or not).

To get the new update, which is compatible with P3Dv4 and P3Dv5, you will need to download a full installer from the Captain Sim website.

You can get your copy of the Captain Sim 767 Captain II from the website.

 

New features:

•  Brand-new engine and wing flex.

Fixed:

• When doing an Instrument Approach using VNAV, 2nm from the FAF we set the MDA or DA on the MCP, select or verify VNAV is engaged on VNAV pth (FMC on approach mode is active). Once the airplane pases the FAF and is at least 300ft below missed approach altitude, we select the Missed APP altitude on the MCP, CS767 is reverting to ALT hold and is not allowing the airplane to re engage VNAV.
• FMC is not engagin On approach mode, meaning VNAV pth only even when speed intervention, airplane should remaint in VNAV pth when de following conditions are met.
• EGPWS improved.
• Route calculation improved.
• I start from C&D or from APU on, I get an A/T warning light come on once the engines are started.
• FD command TO/TO once airplane is airborne, has to give you enough pitch to maintain V2+15/V2+15 with both engines or V2/V2+15 OEI, until pitch mode is engaged, CS 767 is giving nose down FD order.
• VNAV SPD/PTH Errors.
• Insufficient decel logic in VNAV mode (CI of 111 and speed restrictions not complied with). Descent rate is kept to follow VNAV path when it *should* follow speed restrictions and prompt “DRAG REQUIRED” if not able to maintain speed+descent profile.
• VNAV SPD issue. Doing a descend on path with the FMA on IDDLe VNAV PTH, ATC ask’s for speed reduction, when selecting speed intervention to reduce to 250, the airplane does not change the current attitude to pitch for airspeed, it keeps flying the path.
• The aircraft descends at 3000fpm during a CRZ DES of 2000ft between FL360 and FL340, 94nm before the original T/D. This greatly exceeds the quoted 1250fpm approximate descent rate.
• ON APU Panel state issues.
• Floating.
• Cost index calculation improved.
• VNAV activated on the ground.
• When I attempt to change the refresh rate, using the 767 ACE, this error comes up.
• VNAV CLB – altitude prediction calculation improved.
• I’m flying PHOG-KSEA. Estimated fuel remaining at ZINNO and KSEA is off unless our fuel economy is 2,476nm per 1,000lbs. of fuel.
• Selecting a STAR improved.
• VNAV THR light button on the MCP doesn’t stay on until VNAV is engaged.
• When flying Direct to any waypoint and selecting abeams, the FMC selects any abeam waypoints for the route and distance and ETA goes crazy.
• A wee bug in the speed / flap readout on the ADI. During climb out with 15 degrees flap still selected as the speed increases to around 197 knots the FLAP LIM illuminates on the ADI. This is not correct since the flap limit airspeed for flaps 15 is 210 knots.
• Pilot defined waypoints are created as PBD, PB/PB: got an invalid entry message NOT IN DATABASE.
• VNAV. The FMC gives a climb speed of say 310/.786 At about FL290 when M.786 is reached, the speed just keeps increasing and only at about M0.81 does the pitch go up to get the speed back to M0.786. There is somewhat of a delay in the AP response in pitch.
• CTD on some computers.
• TRANS and RESTS points.
• RTE Page LSK_R* selection.
• If we could just stop it from automatically inserting a runway selection into the MCDU when choosing a STAR with no selected runway.

 

 

Edited September 1, 20205 yr by Martin Byrde

Though there are folks with sore past history with CS, I just finished a flawless flight from KLAX to PHNL on v1.0 of the CS B767.  Hope they continue to improve as they have since the initial beta release and that they roll those improvements to their B757.  

3 hours ago, SAX702 said:

Though there are folks with sore past history with CS, I just finished a flawless flight from KLAX to PHNL on v1.0 of the CS B767.  Hope they continue to improve as they have since the initial beta release and that they roll those improvements to their B757.  

How is it compared to the 757 iii?

I own the 757 and on the fence on whether to buy the 767....

Yeah, I wait for the fixes to get down to 757 as well....

Not as huge fan for 767 as for 757, so I might not to get the 767, as least not this price.

Performance is better than  737NGSu ?

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by BMW969

We can't help making comparisons based on how we fly and what's important to us in the simulations we use.  For me, the CS B767 feels heavier and not as fast when climbing as the CS B757, and that's how they are in real life.  Most of the features I use work as expected.  Some details are either not completely implemented or not implemented at all.  For example, the FMS wouldn't allow entry of a flex temperature, though it had the place for it, but it does now in version 1, but he feature of importing winds aloft data into the FMC, while depicted on the FMS, doesn't work yet.  Some say this is even an option in real B767's.  @BMW969, to me performance (smoothness of panning and responsiveness) is similar to the latest PMDG B737.  Like any other airplane, I would only get it, if I have an interest in flying it, like for a virtual airline.  If you're only looking for a modern airliner, with all the latest bells and whistles, look for just that.  The CS B767-300ER simulates an airliner that came out in 1988.  

would be nice to see them bring in an EFB similar to how maddog did for the MD80.  

Yeah, no... after them promising and not delivering updates for v4, not buying a thing from them again...

As glad as I am to hear, not buying until they update the 757.

With regard to flex temp., it’s been implemented in 757 but there’s no real good way to calculate/compute what those numbers/figures are.

TOPCAT is far too outdated and does not include all engine variations or the winglets, 757F or -300.  And, despite requests long ago, CS doesn’t include an EFB or take-off calculator of any sort.

This is what irks me about DEVS like CS that move on to new products without fixing/updating their current products first.

 

 

Edited September 2, 20205 yr by Dreamflight767

58 minutes ago, Dreamflight767 said:

As glad as I am to hear, not buying until they update the 757.

With regard to flex temp., it’s been implemented in 757 but there’s no real good way to calculate/compute what those numbers/figures are.

TOPCAT is far too outdated and does not include all engine variations or the winglets, 757F or -300.  And, despite requests long ago, CS doesn’t include an EFB or take-off calculator of any sort.

This is what irks me about DEVS like CS that move on to new products without fixing/updating their current products first.

 

 

exactly.  I mean I just wish they had the same level of detail to the VC that they put into the external airplane.  I'll be honest.  I can't think of anytime I will actually want to open the engine nacelle and look at all the work they have done inside the engine.  I'd rather see that applied to the systems. 

1 hour ago, micstatic said:

exactly.  I mean I just wish they had the same level of detail to the VC that they put into the external airplane.  I'll be honest.  I can't think of anytime I will actually want to open the engine nacelle and look at all the work they have done inside the engine.  I'd rather see that applied to the systems. 

Well I think that just means their stronger at visuals than systems?

7 hours ago, SAX702 said:

 but he feature of importing winds aloft data into the FMC, while depicted on the FMS, doesn't work yet.  Some say this is even an option in real B767's.

That is correct. The 767's that I flew the wind data had to be manually entered.