C2615

https://forums.x-plane.org/forums/topic/351580-unoffical-commuity-patch-guide-for-fjs727-into-xp12/ Here is my take, "basically flyable" for A-B to my standard. I probably won't go much deeper than this as it should be FJS's job anyway...although glad to see someone is starting to pick it up and working further on it

Sounds interesting, I noticed this one but below my radar for a while as I've heard the XP11 version isn't really up to quality... I'm now kind of feared by "2nd-tier" add-ons... have flown default A330 and feel it's kind not bad and I start to think how bad these non-top tier aircraft could be anyway, turns out Magknight 787 amazed me... in a bad way... I might put this on my radar but I already have FPS748 and Hager380 on the holding list for the same reason above...

Nah, I given up and just taxi though them anyway

Default 737 is kinda old mess and LR seems not bother to update it anyway as Zibo is effectively constantly updating whit their own version anyway. I would suggest just skip the default 737 and go download zibo or Lvup version and start from there.

There are -100 to -900 then Max7 to 10, that's already 13 different big variants IRL, then there are different engine rating, ADV, IGW, BBJ,PIP, SFP, C,BCF, BDSF.... so no, we don't have enough 737s in sim yet

Flight Factor 767 is rather OK

There is no Antarctic terrain in default XP, there are freeware add-on by maps2xplane in .org, Or as part of base pack for XPME, Or payware Antarctica Mega Scenery XP12 by HSimulators in org store (which I use) I visit Antarctic, most of the time Wilkins in flight sim almost annually every southern hemisphere summer.

My company's OFP and EFB can provide a profile of weather information along the route, I'm not aware any simulation product could provide that though...

AFAIK there are panels for Toliss in AM but IRC it will need premium beside AM basepack? I also simply click and pop them out, works totally fine on my multi-monitor setup, I heard there are some problem with 50xx GPU, then maybe try X-TextureExtractor If you really want go premium, Toliss provide official tool for remote monitor at steep price, mainly for simulator building,

I got a lot OOVM CTD with MEP recently and I suspect it's something to do with it's basepack, let me see if it's fixed. For many airport in southwest mountainous area of China, their basepack are much better to get a nice sloped runway on the mountain side rather than totally unusable jagging runway or a big area with unnaturally flat square(thus very jagging boundary)

FMS or any other modern aircraft systems build "by the FCOM" is almost useless, FCOM only describes how pilot use it, it doesn't provide much detail to replicate it properly. I know it because I have tried.

I just got the MIG15 and it's surprisingly well done. Although still can't deep stall this notorious spin machine, hope 12.5 would address that.

Just made a PDCS for it, you can try it out! https://forums.x-plane.org/files/file/100641-performance-data-computer-system-for-flyjsim-737-200v4/

Some old/simpler helo have no governor, so it's needed, and governor fail could be a thing IRL. If you only fly sim one with governor and not plan to practice on manual throttle, it's not mandatory.

I was able to complete a flight with it, however the traffic is weird , I see them when doing per-flight, and even heard a taxi in command to one of them (but no reply), but as I starting to taxi , I see none moving. Same when enroute, I see in the nav display there are quite some flight approaching my destination but when I arrive it seems all landed and non is still moving, so I didn't hear any other exchange between ATC and traffic. The UI and control is fine by just using 2 joystick button, I didn't try voice command as I fail to download it's component. Overall I didn't feel it's any better than XP's own system so far, the main complain I have with Default ATC is it only generate random AI traffic, or no chatter at all with others when using better scheduled traffic (I use World Traffic), which is basically the same in NextATC....