Trust me, if you two guys removed all plugins from X-Plane - including Gizmo - no one at X-Aviation would shed a tear 🙂

 

10 hours ago, Greazer said:

Makes logical sense, the more elements that are taken into account the more accurate the model would be, nothing to argue with that.

They dont have "more elements", they don't even have 1 element. They have a few entries in a look up table entered by hand compared being compared with actual blade elements used to simulate flight from first principles.

They are literally declaring their 640 column multiplication table as superior to 10x 64bit calculators (per wing).

At least FSX has helicopters and gliders, they aren't even that bad.

Edited February 9, 20215 yr by mSparks

2 hours ago, Greazer said:

I rather receive a fix for the nasty little Gizmo thing 😐🤣

Its a sad fact that for the hundreds who have it and have no issues its fine, but for the one or too its the products fault. Never there bad setup.

3 hours ago, Janov said:

Trust me, if you two guys removed all plugins from X-Plane - including Gizmo - no one at X-Aviation would shed a tear 🙂

But if they knew how BREDOK3D was destroying their sales numbers they would be crying all night 😂

2 hours ago, mSparks said:

They dont have "more elements", they don't even have 1 element. They have a few entries in a look up table entered by hand compared being compared with actual blade elements used to simulate flight from first principles.

They are literally declaring their 640 column multiplication table as superior to 10x 64bit calculators (per wing).

At least FSX has helicopters and gliders, they aren't even that bad.

Currently, MFS flight model is extremely primitive compared to XP. The 640 surfaces indeed have no particular significance at this moment.

But in any case, you're arguing with a troll who doesn't understand ----. 🤣

 

Time to put this one to rest..