Great to see you are not alone sir , captains 747 😁

I confess to be confused that said. There is a 2021 thread on exact the same thing and a video that just barely shows the altimeter moving from around 20,000 feet to 20,500 hundred feet. !  No craziness, nothing imo.

Still confused  

Anyway all that aside i was totally alone with FFB (or lack of) on the joystick for about one year so stay focused. So although i have still no idea what the cause is i do support you on principle.

 

Edited May 25, 20224 yr by icewater5

13 hours ago, robert young said:

To me it seems blindingly obvious that the amount of turbulence is just another one of these user options just like all of the other ones.

This point is the only one we can all agree with in this thread, because the claim of 'excessive' turbulence has yet to be demonstrated in the slightest.

4 minutes ago, MrBitstFlyer said:

This point is the only one we can all agree with in this thread, because the claim of 'excessive' turbulence has yet to be demonstrated in the slightest.

Yes it has....

Just now, Simmer2308 said:

Yes it has....

The videos posted showed very mild turbulence and I haven't seen anything else to substantiate the claim.

9 minutes ago, MrBitstFlyer said:

The videos posted showed very mild turbulence and I haven't seen anything else to substantiate the claim.

Then this problem DOESNT apply to you....As time goes on, more and more pilots will complain. And, as long as this topic has legs it will remain on the 1st page so even more will see it. SU8 was good with the turbulence....SU9...Nope

5 minutes ago, Simmer2308 said:

Then this problem DOESNT apply to you....

It apparently doesn't apply to the poster of the videos either, because those videos do not show excessive turbulence.  Perhaps you could post a video to show this problem, unless of course it will just show the very mild turbulence we have already seen.

2 minutes ago, MrBitstFlyer said:

It apparently doesn't apply to the poster of the videos either, because those videos do not show excessive turbulence.  Perhaps you could post a video to show this problem, unless of course it will just show the very mild turbulence we have already seen.

It is subjective. Different strokes for different folks. I can handle that in ALL walks of life. I respect the opinion of others and I am a very polite person by nature. Get on board with us and use your experience with aircraft dynamics and help make this GREAT sim of ours even better!

Thank You for posting....CAVU

17 minutes ago, Simmer2308 said:

As time goes on, more and more pilots will complain

You mean more than the two who complained in here? 😉

lol  😁 this thread is priceless, i mean its like borderline inane

Edited May 25, 20224 yr by icewater5

Watching those videos my take on it is that the turbulence is not excessive but something is "off", the outside views of these airplanes look like toy models on strings where someone is holding the string and jiggling the string?

When "inside" the aircraft I don't get the feeling as to how it looks, so to me it's not really an issue. But obviously it is to some! 

Not to derail but I feel this way about the clouds too - they changed them after SU7 (METAR) and the clouds are totally unrealistic now and the same all around the world; like no variance and boring same old cumulus puffs everywhere and the clouds just seem "off". Much like the turbulence do you get the feeling that they "canned" the weather (turbulence and clouds) to maybe get better performance or dumb it all down due to complaints that the weather was too realistic before?

Speaking for myself I honestly just do not know. (am not a programmer/coder)

You make a good point though that maybe the programmers maybe are working a balance between public opinion (or their perceptions thereof ?)  and performance on literally millions of peoples systems.

I think what would be good is a central platform to co-ordinate perfomance on peoples systems , their visual experiance, and well everything else basically.

Its happening with audio for a while now so why not with msfs 2020 which is way more complicated i think, Just my jumbled thoughts 🙂

Just to add all the server data going through from the central servers to the user side (inc btw a lot of .exe commands) and back again 

 

There are way smarter people on this sort of thing than me on Avsim, right here but my idea i think could be good

 

just to add i was trying hard to be meaningful, deep and analyiticall. but sometimes you lot dont help much                       😎 

Edited May 25, 20224 yr by icewater5

1 hour ago, Simmer2308 said:

It is subjective.

What is?   There is either excessive turbulence or their isn't.   It's not subjective in the slightest.

..and on the subject of it being baked in and always on whatever the weather, I did an early morning flight earlier in Australia, 20c, very light wind.   Smooth as butter.  Almost on rails.  didn't expect turbulence, didn't get any.   (Hand flying the Arrow, a plane that will bounce around if someone farts near it)

This thread is peak Avsim.  12 pages moaning about a "problem" that no one can show actually exists. 😂

The only good thing about this thread is it doesn't have the word Fenix in the title

Edited May 25, 20224 yr by The Moose

2 minutes ago, The Moose said:

What is?   There is either excessive turbulence or their isn't.   It's not subjective in the slightest.

..and on the subject of it being baked in and always on whatever the weather, I did an early morning flight earlier in Australia, 20c, very light wind.   Smooth as butter.  Almost on rails.  didn't expect turbulence, didn't get any.   (Hand flying the Arrow, a plane that will bounce around if someone farts near it)

This thread is peak Avsim.  12 pages moaning about a "problem" that no one can show actually exists. 😂

Thank You for posting...keep the thread alive.

53 minutes ago, KERNEL32 said:

Watching those videos my take on it is that the turbulence is not excessive but something is "off", the outside views of these airplanes look like toy models on strings where someone is holding the string and jiggling the string?

nicely worded....that is exactly how it is....could be coded or some other computer mishap....either way, it needs to be looked into further....

1 hour ago, Farlis said:

You hit the nail on the head. The amount of gaslighting from the thread author when it comes to him simply ignoring completely that his video proves the exact opposite of what he thinks it proves, makes me think he suffers from BPD. 😉

Well, that’s a bit unnecessary, bringing mental illness into an already overheated conversation. Even with the emoji at the end.