@blueshark747 I'd still be curious to know where you saw people (presumably lots of them) bemoaning Carenado not being study level. 

... and now you reckon expecting basic functionality is an 'insane expectation'? 🤐

1 hour ago, lupedelupe said:

and now you reckon expecting basic functionality is an 'insane expectation'? 🤐

Carenado is basic functionality with unfixed bugs and superb visuals...expecting anything more is insanity.🙃

Edited September 15, 20223 yr by blueshark747

On 9/10/2022 at 1:47 PM, blueshark747 said:

Dornier 228

This should be the next one, this is a fun one to fly.
 

Edited September 15, 20223 yr by Alpine Scenery

1 hour ago, blueshark747 said:

Carenado is basic functionality with unfixed bugs and superb visuals...expecting anything more is insanity.🙃

Then I suggest you re-read what @Tim-HH said: their most recent release (as an example) is buggy beyond a point of usefulness. I'm ecstatic you are content with C130-esque incompleteness but most of us expect a product to do what it says on the tin. 

25 minutes ago, lupedelupe said:

Then I suggest you re-read what @Tim-HH said: their most recent release (as an example) is buggy beyond a point of usefulness. I'm ecstatic you are content with C130-esque incompleteness but most of us expect a product to do what it says on the tin. 

I suggest you try the PC-12 for yourself and quit the far fetched CaptainSim C130 comparison babble , as it's still an enjoyable beautiful flyable aircraft even with its bugs.

Will Carenado throw a patch or two at the PC-12, probably so, but again this is pretty much what to expect when buying a Carenado product. Some Carenado products win the patch/improvement lottery and some are completely ignored.

I'm in no way making excuses for Carenado's product quality. The point you fail to grasp is just that, as a consumer one should know and get a feel for Carenado's patterns and adjust your expectations accordingly before purchasing. Do you have a better understanding now?

 

 

 

 

Edited September 15, 20223 yr by blueshark747

1 hour ago, blueshark747 said:

I suggest you try the PC-12 for yourself and quit the far fetched CaptainSim C130 comparison babble , as it's still an enjoyable beautiful flyable aircraft even with its bugs.

Will Carenado throw a patch or two at the PC-12, probably so, but again this is pretty much what to expect when buying a Carenado product. Some Carenado products win the patch/improvement lottery and some are completely ignored.

I'm in no way making excuses for Carenado's product quality. The point you fail to grasp is just that, as a consumer one should know and get a feel for Carenado's patterns and adjust your expectations accordingly before purchasing. Do you have a better understanding now?

 

 

 

 

I've had the PC-12 since the hour of it's release. 

Some folks are happy with the vaguest representation of a real-world object (hence my C130 comment). You appear to be content with a basic product lacking basic functionality (battery, FPS over 40+ minute flights, HSI etc). Good for you.

My original question was that you point out where the masses complained about the lack of system depth. That simply has not happened. 

52 minutes ago, lupedelupe said:

Some folks are happy with the vaguest representation of a real-world object (hence my C130 comment). You appear to be content with a basic product lacking basic functionality (battery, FPS over 40+ minute flights, HSI etc). Good for you

No FPS issues with long 40+ minute flights here fortunately.

Yet here you are stuck with a product purchase you feel is extremely subpar compared to your pre purchase expectations from Carenado a company who's had the writing on the wall of this very predictable outcome for over 10 years now.

On a spectrum between common sense and insanity, my point has been proven.

Have a nice day!🙃

 

 

 

Edited September 15, 20223 yr by blueshark747

... and yet you evade the question. 🙄

Piper Cheyenne and the Dornier 228. And somebody please please pretty please remake the FSX Digital Aviation Dornier 27 for msfs. 🙏

Edited September 16, 20223 yr by saifs

22 hours ago, saifs said:

please remake the FSX Digital Aviation Dornier 27 for msfs. 🙏

Indeed! That plane was SO much fun in the sim.