RIP AMD

[GodAtum 69]

Looking at all the benchmarks coming out for the 13900K, it wipes the floor against the 7950X. Even with MSFS it gets a noticeable fps increase.

https://youtu.be/tPA9B-Dfzac

For those of us running triple 4K monitors, this paired with the 4090 could be a lifesaver!

Edited October 20, 2022 by GodAtum

[G-RFRY 1,712]

 

[rjack1282 316]

I'm so glad AMD upped its game over the last 10 years or Intel would probably still be asleep at the wheel.  How does that saying go?  You can only poke the bear for so long.

[wiler 394]

1 hour ago, GodAtum said:

Looking at all the benchmarks coming out for the 13900K, it wipes the floor against the 7950X. Even with MSFS it gets a noticeable fps increase.

https://youtu.be/tPA9B-Dfzac

For those of us running triple 4K monitors, this paired with the 4090 could be a lifesaver!

the 5800x3d still has better perf then the 13900, what are you talking about AMD is RIP?? 

[F737MAX 5,621]

39 minutes ago, wiler said:

the 5800x3d still has better perf then the 13900, what are you talking about AMD is RIP?? 

Just clickbaity articles and videos for monetisation and Intel überfans.

The 5800X3D is a truly fantastic CPU given that in spite of its lower clockspeed and lower TDP, it is not beaten on average FPS by the latest generation CPUs.
There will come a time when the 5800X3D is surpassed in performance in a flight sim. I think that won't happen until the 7800X3D and 7950X3D are released.

At least the flight simmers using latest gen tech won't have to turn on the heating in their homes. Their CPUs will do the job for them. 😁

[sfgiants13 83]

3 hours ago, wiler said:

the 5800x3d still has better perf then the 13900, what are you talking about AMD is RIP?? 

I was going to ask. I am starting a new build soon and was wondering if I should wait or just go for the 5800x3d.

[hs118 707]

not sure I would call a 5-10% increase in FPS "wiping the floor".

[pgde 571]

Also, isn't there an issue with Windows11, AMD's 7xxx series and SMT degrading performance? See 

 

[fppilot 4,387]

5 hours ago, wiler said:

the 5800x3d still has better perf then the 13900, what are you talking about AMD is RIP?? 

Please just recognize this topic is one of this.

[wiler 394]

46 minutes ago, fppilot said:

Please just recognize this topic is one of this.

whatever it is I will call it out as it is. AMD is doing just fine. 

[odourboy 1,290]

6 hours ago, wiler said:

the 5800x3d still has better perf then the 13900, what are you talking about AMD is RIP?? 

At HD, I agree, the Ryzen wiped the floor, but at 4K, the 5800X3D barely edged out the 12900KS. So before you dismiss the 13900, figure out what you'll be running. My bet is at 4K or VR, the 13900 will dominate. 

Edited October 20, 2022 by odourboy

[micstatic 4,322]

Will be interesting to see somebody compare the 13900k vs 5800X3D in some benchmarks .  If 13900k surpasses the 5800X3D I still think it will be short-lived.  Then the 7 series X3D. 

[G-RFRY 1,712]

You should also take account of frame time Intel is slightly faster than AMD, the time taken to load each frame lower is better.

 

[G-RFRY 1,712]

 

[RobJC 2,069]

8 hours ago, sfgiants13 said:

I was going to ask. I am starting a new build soon and was wondering if I should wait or just go for the 5800x3d.

You might want to look at AM5, as that platform will be around for years. It is the 7000 series CPUs. The 5000 series CPUs are AM4, so the time to build a system around that motherboard has passed. Jmho. 

Edited October 21, 2022 by RobJC