Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The AVSIM Community

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Turbulence / Icing

Featured Replies

Just curious how and if turbulence and icing is modeled in MSFS... I was using FSrealistic but I heard it was conflicting with plane behavior in the Fenix and a few others so I shut it off.  I also felt like the turbulence in FSrealistic was random and just for effect.  I did a flight without it in windy conditions and the flight felt smooth.  Just curious what the thoughts are there.  Also, I flew out of fog/drizzle and below 10 degrees C and with the engine Anti Ice on, the Fenix said ice not detected.  Thanks

Intel Core i7 12700K (5.0GHz Max Boost Clock) 12-Core CPU   32GB G.Skill Performance DDR4 SDRAM 3600MHz       Graphics Processor:12GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, GDDR6x System   2TB Western Digital, NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive

 

 

 

 

23 minutes ago, Zimmerbz said:

Just curious how and if turbulence and icing is modeled in MSFS... I was using FSrealistic but I heard it was conflicting with plane behavior in the Fenix and a few others so I shut it off.  I also felt like the turbulence in FSrealistic was random and just for effect.  I did a flight without it in windy conditions and the flight felt smooth.  Just curious what the thoughts are there.  Also, I flew out of fog/drizzle and below 10 degrees C and with the engine Anti Ice on, the Fenix said ice not detected.  Thanks

Only problem I have seen with FS Realistic and the Fenix, is sometimes when flaps are lowered and landing gear, the zoom wheel on the mouse stops working. Switching views a bit, usually brings it right back. Worst case, just close FS realistic. I only had to do that once. 

Edited by Bobsk8

 

 

 

  • Author
16 minutes ago, Bobsk8 said:

Only problem I have seen with FS Realistic and the Fenix, is sometimes when flaps are lowered and landing gear, the zoom wheel on the mouse stops working. Switching views a bit, usually brings it right back. Worst case, just close FS realistic. I only had to do that once. 

Do you think that the turbulence in FSRealistic represents the weather in the sim or do you think it is just there for show?  

Intel Core i7 12700K (5.0GHz Max Boost Clock) 12-Core CPU   32GB G.Skill Performance DDR4 SDRAM 3600MHz       Graphics Processor:12GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, GDDR6x System   2TB Western Digital, NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive

 

 

 

 

1 minute ago, Zimmerbz said:

Do you think that the turbulence in FSRealistic represents the weather in the sim or do you think it is just there for show?

FSRealistic doesn't create its own turbulence but simulates movement and sounds when you hit the MSFS generated turbulence.  

Eric

i9-12900k, RTX 5070ti OC, 32GB ddr5 5600 RAM, 2TB 980 Pro SSD, Titan 240RX AIO, Samsung CRG90 49", Win 11

2 minutes ago, Zimmerbz said:

Do you think that the turbulence in FSRealistic represents the weather in the sim or do you think it is just there for show?  

Mostly for show.  Similar to icing and lightening.  Yesterday I had the first lightening I have seen in months, in November.  And at two weather sites where lightening is reported there was not within 1,000 miles.

Frank Patton
Corsair 5000D Airflow Case; MSI B650 Tomahawk MOB; Ryzen 7 7800 X3D CPU; ASUS RTX 4080 Super; 
NZXT 360mm liquid cooler; Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR5 4800 MHz RAM; RMX850X Gold PSU;; ASUS VG289 4K 27" Display; Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Crosswind 3's w/dampener.  
Former USAF meteorologist & ground weather school instructor. AOPA Member #07379126
                       
"I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." - John Deere

  • Author
Just now, fppilot said:

Mostly for show.  Similar to icing and lightening.  Yesterday I had the first lightening I have seen in months, in November.  And at two weather sites where lightening is reported there was not within 1,000 miles.

That is what I figured.... If only they would open up weather to 3rd parties.  

Intel Core i7 12700K (5.0GHz Max Boost Clock) 12-Core CPU   32GB G.Skill Performance DDR4 SDRAM 3600MHz       Graphics Processor:12GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, GDDR6x System   2TB Western Digital, NVMe M.2 Solid State Drive

 

 

 

 

10 minutes ago, Zimmerbz said:

That is what I figured.... If only they would open up weather to 3rd parties.  

I first recognized these within 30 days and reported and requested opening up the SDK in mid October 2020.  Opened a ticket and never got a reply.  Weather is an important element to my simulation activities as I have a weather background.  The Asobo/MS response continues to be "Not Planned"  Meanwhile we have a dew point, for an example, that is always "13", even when the ambient temp is below 13.   "Temperature 5°C, dew point 13". 

%^&&^$%&*^* is what I say to that!  How embarassing! 

 

Edited by fppilot

Frank Patton
Corsair 5000D Airflow Case; MSI B650 Tomahawk MOB; Ryzen 7 7800 X3D CPU; ASUS RTX 4080 Super; 
NZXT 360mm liquid cooler; Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR5 4800 MHz RAM; RMX850X Gold PSU;; ASUS VG289 4K 27" Display; Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Crosswind 3's w/dampener.  
Former USAF meteorologist & ground weather school instructor. AOPA Member #07379126
                       
"I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." - John Deere

8 minutes ago, fppilot said:

I first recognized these within 30 days and reported and requested opening up the SDK in mid October 2020.  Opened a ticket and never got a reply.  Weather is an important element to my simulation activities as I have a weather background.

My guess is, that's unlikely to happen. Some people will argue that the current system is almost perfect and better than anything we have seen thus far. As you have the background, you'll be a good judge of that.

2 hours ago, Zimmerbz said:

Do you think that the turbulence in FSRealistic represents the weather in the sim or do you think it is just there for show?  

It probably just amplifies the bouncing around that the sim turbulence causes and makes it more visible in the cockpit. I find that if it is turned up too high, it makes turning knobs and setting things on the flight deck too difficult, so I turn it down until the movement is acceptable. 

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Zimmerbz said:

Just curious how and if turbulence and icing is modeled in MSFS.

Icing is definitely modelled in MSFS!

Timestamps: Introduction 0:10 Flight Into Known Icing (FIKI) 2:24 Ice Control Systems 2:28 De-Icing Boots 2:47 Propeller Heat 3:35 Probe Heat 3:57 Summary of Ice Control Systems 4:34 Icing Demonstration 4:51 Departure 5:12 Level at 3,000' MSL 5:58 Time Lapse Ice Removal 7:07 Landing ILS RWY 32 CYOW 8:00

Edited by Doering

I got icing today exactly where it reported in real life (wing aloft) in my area . So I can't complain about weather. Certainly it' not perfect but not as bad as some claims

Life time flight sim enthusiast, current airplane owner 172P (past C182F). FAA CP/IR ASEL/AMEL, FI ASEL

My System: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D , MSI X870 GAMING PLUS, 64G RAM, ASUS RTX5090, 4T SSD

Put my hands on (pic/dual/given)

7GCAA, 8KCAB, BE24, BE76, BE35-C33, BE35, C150, C152, C172B/N/P/R/SP, 182F, M20E,M20C, M20J, AT6(SNJ4), PA28-140,PA28-151, PA28-161,PA28-181,PA28RT-201,PA28R-180/201T, PA24-250, PA32-300R, PA44, AC114, YAK-18T, YAK-52, SR22

 

The weather is very good overall, we can't expect perfection. I just don't like the implementation of the turbulence system, it's piece-meal and not cleanly done IMHO, it's all over the place.

I would only say the way they are triangulating the data could be better, it's too narrow. My bigger complaints are the way they handle the snow, especially with custom polygons. It's a total nightmare to deal with snow with custom polygon textures, and that needs to change. It shouldn't be different from one texture to another, every texture should have 3 settings "snow - light, no snow, snow - heavy". Then everything will blend better too. 

 

AMD 5800x | Nvidia 3080 (12gb) | 64gb ram

3 hours ago, ha5mvo said:

My guess is, that's unlikely to happen. Some people will argue that the current system is almost perfect and better than anything we have seen thus far. As you have the background, you'll be a good judge of that.

👎 And not even arguable considering launch to the present.  Several cloud types are even today missing, and what is fed to ATIS/AWOS is embarassing.  That over two years since launch.  Special effects (turbulance, lightening/thunder, and icing) are totally missing at times, and when present totally over cooked. 

Frank Patton
Corsair 5000D Airflow Case; MSI B650 Tomahawk MOB; Ryzen 7 7800 X3D CPU; ASUS RTX 4080 Super; 
NZXT 360mm liquid cooler; Corsair Vengeance 64GB DDR5 4800 MHz RAM; RMX850X Gold PSU;; ASUS VG289 4K 27" Display; Honeycomb Alpha & Bravo, Crosswind 3's w/dampener.  
Former USAF meteorologist & ground weather school instructor. AOPA Member #07379126
                       
"I will never put my name on a product that does not have in it the best that is in me." - John Deere

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.