ha5mvo

No, the "developer" was a group of people actually and tooltips were available for most part, though not all instruments. At any rate, I'm sure you can still get a refund for the big bucks you had paid for it...

More importantly, will it solve the slalom after steep turns?

Might be using the walkaround removal mode? something else that may be modifying the GUI?

If it’s the departure clearance that’s you are expecting to see, then it would only appear on the mcdu as you have mentioned. Other instructions such as altitude clearance, handovers etc. should appear on your dcdu, however.

Working fine here. Did it work for you with the bridge before the latest update?

My guess is that you have gsx pax enabled which is more likely the culprit rather then the plane itself. this can be easily corrected by untucking and re-ticking the pax option in the gsx manager rather than reinstalling the whole shabang.

Don’t recall if i ever stumbled upon wake turbulence in the sim. I might have attenuated it completely as the general turbulence model is so excessively overdone that it bares not even remote resemblance to what one might expect in reality.

So you are having issues with wake turbulence. I assume you’re happy with the “normal” turbulence, right?

It’s always been the case. They have shut down the discord channel for the holiday and seem to have liked this so much that it will remain permanently shut. At least that’s what I understand from their latest communication. If you’re having issues the only channel that’s left for you is to open a ticket. From my experience thus far they respond quite promptly.

On my setup this is definitely a chaseplane issue. The way around it is to set the camera setting to "rigid" so it wouldn't wobble about as much and open a ticket with parallel 42 so they can try and tackle that issue

On my part at least, it has nothing to do with turns or PMDG (which is an issue in its own right). It's like the plane is constantly hitting exaggerated turbulence.

Most likely chaseplane. The worst I got was with the FSL A321 to the degree I had to set he camera to almost rigid. Didn't notice it as much with the 737 but the weather may also play a part.

I have been given a new build after opening a ticket that seems to have resolved the ctd issue.

I have it in both and experience constant ctd or at best it fails to load once it goes past the tutorial. quite disappointing I have to admit.

Thanks for that! it worked.

Supposed to be a free update for those who have it in 2020. How to go about doing that? It only seems to offer the option to buy it..

I honestly don't understand the concept. Isn't the live weather for a time and place "typical" enough to represent the typical weather for said place and time?

CP does indeed have an option to be toggled on/off, which can of course be a possible solution. it’s not available (yet) for 2024, so all discussion is relevant for 2020 only.

What’s the difference between a walk around “ view and your standard external view then?

I don't have the bonanza yet do I can't give a definite answer, but here's what I do know: 1) CP would turn off the default camera system 2) A2A would use the camera system for its predefined external views in the walkaround My guess is that for the reasons above you will not get it working with the Bonanza either, or with anything that makes use of the default camera system for that matter. You can of course circumvent this by setting external views at the same spots using CP so it basically would give the same result. Downside is, that you'll need to bind those views to keys on your keyboard or some other controller.

For this you’ll need to go back to fs2004….

There's a setting for cloud turbulence in AS. Realturb also does cloud turbulence. I use both and tune the settings so they don't overcook it when working together. The result is quite convincing in my opinion. Well, at any rate its far more convincing than what MSFS [doesn't] do...

Not so clear on what “this” is and what it is exactly that you are trying to do

I thought that MSFS airfield lights are always on...

There is a thing called AREDS formula that contains those things, as well as other antioxidants. It is indeed prescribed for AMD (age related macular degeneration) in an attempt to prevent it from REVERTING from dry form into the wet form that is advancing at a much faster rate. There is no published evidence that I’m aware of, however, that shows any benefit of the areds formula as a prophylaxis agaist developing dry AMD or indeed any benefit in treating milder grade. The original AREDS research was conducted at the beginning of the century. A follow up study (aka areds2) was done 10 years later with an attempt to determine if fish oils provide any additional benefit in that regard. Well, areds2 had failed to show any such benefit from fish oils. Bottom line is, that if one does have anything beyond a mild grade of AMD (that is determined by the presence, size and distribution of particular sediments on the retina) then by all means one should take the AREDS formula (and not just bits and pieces of it) as recommended by the research. Otherwise, one needs to consider the potential costs (not just money wise) of consuming mega doses of antioxidants unnecessarily.