I noticed there is a new graphic option Nvidia reflex low latency, I dont know if camem with SU12 or before, but I want somebody explains what is it for, and the best setting for it. (I am using a NVidia GForce RTX 3060) Thanks

I've seen that there for some time. I have always had it ON+BOOST. I think I saw it recommended somewhere to use that setting.

I've tried all the different settings under this option and can't see any difference in perfomance, smoothness or anything else.  Not sure what I should be using or not using or why TBH

Edited March 23, 20233 yr by cianpars

The setting makes no difference to me, but maybe it is better for people using frame generation on the 40 series cards, as this can induce the slightest bit of lag, barely anything though, and not really affecting anything in a flight simulator (it's not a shooter type game where fast response is needed).  A bit of lag might actually make up for the lack of inertia feeling!    

I've been using the NVCP version for a long time it helps w/ in cockpit panning quality for me, but never turned this one on in-sim.

3 hours ago, bobcat999 said:

the lack of inertia feeling!

That sounds hard to describe in words--in fact I don't know what it means in the context of this sim??

21 minutes ago, Noel said:

That sounds hard to describe in words--in fact I don't know what it means in the context of this sim??

Give 'the other sim' a shot and you'll not need words to describe it, you'll just feel it. 🙂

5 minutes ago, Ianrivaldosmith said:

Give 'the other sim' a shot and you'll not need words to describe it, you'll just feel it. 🙂

How did P3D 4.x stack up on this aspect?  

5 minutes ago, Noel said:

How did P3D 4.x stack up on this aspect?  

No ideas, I never used P3D.

The "reactivity" sensitivity control tries to get at this I believe in that it affects how quickly the plane responds to controller inputs.

57 minutes ago, Noel said:

The "reactivity" sensitivity control tries to get at this I believe in that it affects how quickly the plane responds to controller inputs.

Yes true, but no substitute for the real thing though.  It needs to be modelled in somehow.  Some developers can manage to get the feel of inertia to some degree.  
The PMDG 737's aren't bad, but some of the GA gets thrown around like it has no mass.

It isn't so much the getting thrown around actually, it is just that there seems to be no acceleration into the getting thrown around, just almost instant movement.

It's against the law of physics captain!   {Scotty - Star Trek}

32 minutes ago, bobcat999 said:

Yes true, but no substitute for the real thing though.  It needs to be modelled in somehow.  Some developers can manage to get the feel of inertia to some degree.  
The PMDG 737's aren't bad, but some of the GA gets thrown around like it has no mass.

It isn't so much the getting thrown around actually, it is just that there seems to be no acceleration into the getting thrown around, just almost instant movement.

It's against the law of physics captain!   {Scotty - Star Trek}

Okay well that's why I'm not so familiar with it--I only fly 3 planes and no lightweight GA, and it seems a relatively simple problem to overcome I would think--i.e. adjust the data tables for different airframes.  I mean if some of the GA gets thrown around this suggests it's just never been correctly configured for those airframes.

Edited March 23, 20233 yr by Noel

2 hours ago, Ianrivaldosmith said:

No ideas, I never used P3D.

Wow, Alzimer?

 

Perhaps he never inhaled. 

1 hour ago, LRBS said:

Wow, Alzimer?

You mean Alzheimer?

And I did dabble yes, however I never used it as my main sim at any point. So, I would have no ideas about inertia in that sim. Probably could have worded my reply to read more along the lines  of ‘no ideas, never used it properly to determine if it has intertia’. More of a messing around period. (As you can see by the post that you’ve dug up).

But yeah, that’s for searching for me. Didn’t realise I meant so much 🙂 

Edited March 23, 20233 yr by Ianrivaldosmith