On 5/1/2025 at 6:59 PM, V1ROTA7E said:

Wasn’t expecting this! Looks incredible! Anyone buy it yet? Word on performance compared to bmw?

Not much. Highly disappointed but MK is just an ini in disguise 

1 hour ago, Aboodyking said:

Not much. Highly disappointed but MK is just an ini in disguise 

I bought it a few days ago. I actually think it performs very well, far better than BMW, and it looks fantastic. I'd highly recommend.

Any news on the gsx profile for this?

10 hours ago, Aboodyking said:

Not much. Highly disappointed but MK is just an ini in disguise 

What exactly do you mean by that?

14 hours ago, Aboodyking said:

Not much. Highly disappointed but MK is just an ini in disguise 

Account less than a year old, 53 posts and involve MK an iniBuilds. I smell a dev in disguise.

On 5/1/2025 at 9:38 AM, Christopher Low said:

Are you reading this, IniBuilds?

why did you want a burger king in the terminal and 15 fps ?  🙂 

16 hours ago, V1ROTA7E said:

I bought it a few days ago. I actually think it performs very well, far better than BMW, and it looks fantastic. I'd highly recommend.

now if virgin would put the 787 back on it instead of that pesky 330 neo id be happy 

On 5/9/2025 at 11:13 AM, Christopher Low said:

What exactly do you mean by that?

someone was asking about the performance and i said it's not that great when compared to BMW's.. MK's KSEA is much more stable but has less frames while BMW has less frames and is a stutterfest both absolutely not worth it. 

On 5/9/2025 at 2:44 PM, B777ER said:

Account less than a year old, 53 posts and involve MK an iniBuilds. I smell a dev in disguise.

haha good but I'm not and i just joined i didn't think I'd love forums but they're addictive and I'm a tired customer MK has done atrocities for example 

EIDW : has terrible performance since release and even with updates the airport looks average in detail and now the main terminal building is in less than 512p texture absolutely unaccepted.

KPHL : performs badly in everyway since release and even with updates it doesn't get better i believe it had become an abandonware 

LSZH : follows the same trend as KPHL and is more demanding 

LEMG : is more harsh on frames as LEMD by LVFR but that i can excuse because it's one of the largest European hubs but LEMG ? f no 

KSEA : is not great either it conflicts with DD KAPE and KRENT i had to remove them to have a borderline performance. 

interestingly 

LEBL and ROAH perform the best considering their size + location I'm not sure what they did but they need to implement it into their other products

and i know some in the comments will say "well it works for me" then congrats I'm sure you're not even over 90fps but i cannot fly under 80fps if see an airport that tanks my fps to the 80s and 70s i know that it's not optimized at all. 

lazy & greedy devs always rely on the mentality of that flight simmer who thinks the sim shouldn't reach more than 60fps.. that's perfect for them because they can cut corners and do it fast like ini.. a prime example is their OMDB it exist in an area with no Photogrammetry meaning the performance hit should be as extreme but it's one of the most difficult to run even more demanding than their EGLL.. which is the heart of the hardest photogrammetry areas in the sim to run. 

 

it's about time we as customers move to the future and have a fluid + high fps + stable sim instead of being okay with mediocre 

3 hours ago, Aboodyking said:

haha good but I'm not and i just joined i didn't think I'd love forums but they're addictive and I'm a tired customer MK has done atrocities for example 

EIDW : has terrible performance since release and even with updates the airport looks average in detail and now the main terminal building is in less than 512p texture absolutely unaccepted.

LSZH : follows the same trend as KPHL and is more demanding 

LEMG : is more harsh on frames as LEMD by LVFR but that i can excuse because it's one of the largest European hubs but LEMG ? f no 

Check out the 2015 specification PC in my signature that I use to run the above three airports (at high detail) in MSFS 2020. I do not have performance issues with any of them. I also do not have a problem with the textures at EIDW Dublin v2 🤷‍♂️

Edited May 17, 20251 yr by Christopher Low

10 hours ago, Christopher Low said:

Check out the 2015 specification PC in my signature that I use to run the above three airports (at high detail) in MSFS 2020. I do not have performance issues with any of them. I also do not have a problem with the textures at EIDW Dublin v2 🤷‍♂️

with your setup you won't be getting more 30 ~ 35 fps on a good day.. so with that in mind with even go to most performance hungry airport the performance stays within expected margins.

for me i get 90fps stable without autofps and all other shenanigans.. i use optimized settings not every thing on ultra and sometimes i get 100fps depending on sim's mood.. so going from 100~90 to the lowest 80s and mid 70s is absolutely immersion breaking and not within expected margins and the fact it happens in specific airports tells me so much about the supposed optimization efforts claimed by devs all the time.. and when i compare an airport with similar characteristics it again shows that those specific airports are badly optimized.

the more fps you get the easier to see how much is left to be done in terms of optimization 

Edited May 17, 20251 yr by Aboodyking

Framerates in the mid 70s are immersion breaking??

1 hour ago, Aboodyking said:

with your setup you won't be getting more 30 ~ 35 fps on a good day.. so with that in mind with even go to most performance hungry airport the performance stays within expected margins.

for me i get 90fps stable without autofps and all other shenanigans.. i use optimized settings not every thing on ultra and sometimes i get 100fps depending on sim's mood.. so going from 100~90 to the lowest 80s and mid 70s is absolutely immersion breaking and not within expected margins and the fact it happens in specific airports tells me so much about the supposed optimization efforts claimed by devs all the time.. and when i compare an airport with similar characteristics it again shows that those specific airports are badly optimized.

the more fps you get the easier to see how much is left to be done in terms of optimization 

With all due respect, 70 frames being immersion breaking is absolutely crazy talk. Come on now....

On 5/1/2025 at 1:39 PM, micstatic said:

GSX profile coming in a few days 

Always none GSX Profile coming...