3 hours ago, cianpars said:

Have you tried DLSS DLAA Ryan?  To me that seems as good as TAA in many ways though I don't fly much with glass cockpits, so can't really make any judgements on that aspect?

That's what ChatGPT suggested for me.   I find it better the other DLSS options, with regard to the ghosting artifacts associated with glass cockpits.   Not perfect but I can now live with it and benefit from much higher frame rates. 

5 hours ago, FBW737 said:

I'm not a skeptic. I think AI has truly mimicked human intelligence and completely surpassed it. It spews out perfect pros and waxes lyrical about a myriad of facts and concepts in a multidisciplinary fashion that exudes plausibility and credibility which in the long run turns out to be utter 💩. Just like the erudite and highly intellectual humans we used to rely on to get us into every mess that history has bothered to record only far better at it. Can't wait to see the utterly 💩consequences our species faces once we start to let AI make the big decisions for us!🤣🥸

Dinosaurs had that meteor event thingy, humans couldn't wait for their own extinction event so invented ai. 

I'm sorry but it's really REALLY tragic how fast 'we' are cramming all human history and learning into this soulless meat grinder. 

6 hours ago, sloppysmusic said:

Dinosaurs had that meteor event thingy, humans couldn't wait for their own extinction event so invented ai. 

I'm sorry but it's really REALLY tragic how fast 'we' are cramming all human history and learning into this soulless meat grinder. 

Hm, it might just as well save us from total destruction of all life on Earth.

21 hours ago, Lima India said:

AI can be great if you already know enough about the subject matter to determine what is good advice and what isn’t. Otherwise beware. 

I think that is a perfect description of the internet. Many people (and AI) struggle to tell the difference.

10 hours ago, sloppysmusic said:

Dinosaurs had that meteor event thingy, humans couldn't wait for their own extinction event so invented ai. 

I'm sorry but it's really REALLY tragic how fast 'we' are cramming all human history and learning into this soulless meat grinder. 

Every generation has had it's bogyman that was supposed to be the end of civilization as we know it (at least according to the old folks).   From the jazz music, to TV's, to the internet.   AI will be no different.   If it if turns out otherwise, I welcome our AI overlords and will point them towards this post in hopes that they will at least give me a quick death.

Edited August 29, 2025Aug 29 by 11bee

1 hour ago, flyingscampi said:

I think that is a perfect description of the internet. Many people (and AI) struggle to tell the difference.

At least, with the Internet in general, you have some means of looking at the source and deciding if you want to trust it or not. AI generated advice presents itself as authoritative, even when it is completely false. Which is fine, as long as you remember it's a tool - and learn how to use it.

I have the latest ChatGPT 5 paid version through my work and you can just ask it for sources and it will give them to you.

25 minutes ago, rjack1282 said:

I have the latest ChatGPT 5 paid version through my work and you can just ask it for sources and it will give them to you.

The point is, it isn't very difficult to find examples of well-written AI-generated content that looks plausible, but is in fact complete rubbish. If you are the kind of person that checks sources, good for you - you are less likely to be fooled than most.

 

The thing with AI answers are to remember that its a starting point for you, not the end point. If you want to be certain where you are heading based on the info/advice provided, its up to you to do the extra research on the sources. 
A good generative AI tool will provide citations as to material it has found to back-up its claims.

Well I used it for my next build and it was helpful was just curious... ChatGPT 5 and Grok lol

 

On 8/28/2025 at 4:41 PM, ryanbatc said:

I did this just now for fun...  I think the results are very good.  It's very similar to how my own settings are.  The only thing I don't like is DLSS.  I run TAA because DLSS blurs glass too much.  I do think DLSS works well with better fps on analog panels though.

 

 

21 hours ago, 11bee said:

they will at least give me a quick death.

Nope. A quick death would be a waste of potential information research and potential energy. More likely you'd be hooked up to some infernal machine and kept alive as cheaply and as long as possible before being broken down into parts for other decommissioned human bodies. 

IF you're lucky they'd put you into a permanent coma for the duration to suppress the disruption your anguish and screams would cause to the program. If they require autonomous movement from you as in slave labor or simple motor skills (testing only as machines do those activities better) you'd be needed awake of course to avoid muscle atrophy. 

Hope and trust are human qualities. No need for them for your ai overlords and their underlings. Except as deliberately mimicked human qualities to pacify the human resource line (HRL). 

TLDR if you put or allow ai to take charge you're ****** (again if you're lucky).