Does anyone have any further comments on the complexity level of this addon in terms of realism and functionality? I can’t quite determine if it’s a nice looking but fairly shallow simulated a/c?

On 6/25/2026 at 11:27 AM, Ricardo41 said:

If I remember correctly, the FSW version even had the option of dual GTN 750s.

The Contrail one doesn't? Hard pass.

The contrail has a real RNAV-capable avionics suite. the FSW just had VOR navigation so needed the (unrealistic, mind you) GTN option to offer modern navigation capabilities.

2 minutes ago, Purr said:

Does anyone have any further comments on the complexity level of this addon in terms of realism and functionality? I can’t quite determine if it’s a nice looking but fairly shallow simulated a/c?

It's a fully simulated Falcon 50 - Simulated to the same degree as other addons like Justflight/Skyward/etc. It behaves as it should by the book.

2 hours ago, Stavros said:

It's a fully simulated Falcon 50 - Simulated to the same degree as other addons like Justflight/Skyward/etc. It behaves as it should by the book.

So this is like a flysimware learjet? To that level?

10 hours ago, xender said:

So this is like a flysimware learjet? To that level?

It's trickier to land than the Lear and handling feels more challenging but that feeling is based on very little time with it .

If you like the Lear you'll like this too. Same level ... maybe .

On 6/27/2026 at 4:59 AM, nippa said:

It's trickier to land than the Lear and handling feels more challenging but that feeling is based on very little time with it .

If you like the Lear you'll like this too. Same level ... maybe .

Lear is definitely harder though, the Falcon still has an FMS and magenta line. Also not quite as much of a rocket on takeoff which keeps things manageable when you have restrictions and such.