Gazzareth

It's not day 1 for me, since if they are splitting the models as suggested I will wait for the freighter. Was hoping it would have been done as before (similar to the 737 & 738 in MSFS as well) where you got the 200LR & F as a single purchase. As it is coming soon I actually did a P3D flight last night in the 777F, had forgotten how good it actually is. Followed up with a flight in the 737BDSF back in MSFS, looking forward to be able to fly the 777 in MSFS after that. G

I would suggest that those people should probably head to an opticians to get checked out, they clearly have vision issues. G

The Phenom 300 is being done by FSReborn. Certainly an amazing time for bizjets, especially those with "modern" avionics - something sorely lacking in P3D. Looking forward to anything by FSReborn, FFX & FSW. Flew the 25 to a lot in p3d, was very late to the FSW 35 party , but after I got that I flew the 25 once - then straight back to the 35. Not a massive fan of the steam gauge jets anyway, so the FSW 35 is enough in my hangar, might get the FSW Falcon when that comes out. G PS:- Think that XP left the autothrottles in because they couldn't get the speed hold modes to work correctly. I know that was still the case in v3.0.

Funny, for me it has loaded fine every time. Unloading it has messed up every time. Last time / current version the pax deboarded for the first time. Their luggage, stayed on the plane though... G

Quite agree, much preferred the way they did it before. I'll wait to see the prices, but odds on I'll just get the -F .. .. G

Nikko did say "7000 next" on Discord, so make of that what you will. He also commented that the Piaggio & CX were now in Alpha. G Edit: Actually here's another hint:::

Great news, pretty sure they've still got one project left to announce. Anyone not betting on a Global Express? G

Not at all surprising there is no Gulfstream, there's a superb Challenger, but it's in another sim - might get one some day in MSFS, but it's a safe bet that it won't be the same quality... 😉 G

Getting the impression that we should rename AI traffic, it was never Intelligent anyway. CG Traffic? Gets rid of some of the confusion... G

At the moment for me P2ATC is the way to go, buy it and it's yours - plus out of the three options mentioned by the OP it is the only one that is multi-sim. Voice works well enough and it mostly does a decent job of it. SI is far too pricey for me, not happening, never (unless I win the lottery). Also, just checked and there is currently an average 12.5 secs response time. Which to me is <word not allowed>. Beyond ATC might be of interest, still a bit early to tell. Some of their "free" voices actually seem far worse than the SAPI voices P2ATC uses though, as they totally mangle what they are saying (mostly the non-UK/US speakers). Will be keeping an eye on that one though... G

Actually both that and the later version with the G5000. The ES version is still my most flown aircraft of all time, although the Longitude is getting close (as is the 737 if you include all variants)... G

Lol I'm the exact opposite, prefer the HondaJet by a mile. That said both are extremely well done, so I do have high hopes for both the Citation Xs. Strikes me that the X is a bigger project though as it's effectively starting from scratch - Working Title have done some of the heavy lifting for the X+. G

Pretty sure they are also bundling in a lot less free premium time now as well, which was pretty much half the initial cost in the first place. G

Lol me as well, instant purchase. G

FlightFX have been well and truly outed, first couple of minutes: Can't wait for that pair! G

Should be glad that there is a test available, most devs don't do that. There is also the free version that's not time limited. G

@MattNischan It's not that, done that approach many times in pretty much every "Garmin" flightsim product...... The G3000 behaves in exactly the same way as the trainer, the PMS doesn't. If you load the approach in any of them (in this case EGPH/ILS24 with TLA transition) it will keep EGPH at the bottom of the Flightplan and drop the approach below it. However, in the G3000 or trainer you can delete out EGPH so it sequences correctly (both if these also let you change altitude restrictions). In the PMS deleting out EGPH deletes the approach after it. Pretty sure that's what happened pre AAU1... G

They know, it's been reported multiple times.. .. .. G

I'm the same, QW RJ70 was a great aircraft in P3D. The only downside being that (from last I heard) there isn't a cargo variant for the RJ. G

If you are on about the RJ version, that is coming later - although I believe that will be a separate purchase, don't know if there will be a discount for 146 owners.... G

Not happening, I'd stay with Pilot2ATC rather than take a subscription. Fortunately other alternatives are coming without a subscription element. G

Same boat for me as well, although there are still advantages and disadvantages to both units. I fly into Edinburgh regularly in the sim, generally if I'm flying the STAR I get vectors, else ATC gives me TLA and no STAR. On the PMS I find the STAR & Vectors to final work best... G

That is the standard behaviour for the PMS WTT mode or not. I've asked PMS about it (since it is no longer an issue on the Working Title units) but apparently it can't be changed. Work around is to activate the approach before you hit the leg direct to the airport. Not ideal though.... This isn't the behaviour you get on the Garmin Trainer (ie TDS) based products. G

Saves updating procedures into both as well, along with altitude restrictions. Pretty sure PMS passes through VCALC & Fuel prediction info as well. You also a few extra data fields at the top of the second unit - don't remember seeing them on a trainer based 2nd unit (RXP/F1). Generally I'd leave one as a map and do all the input etc on the other. G

Must admit having 2 units is great, hoping that will be an option in the Lear soon. Would much prefer that over the current setup... G