turnandbank

This is my experience too. I also tried SI via the free trial they offered again, but the descent clearances always left me way too high and there were multiple traffic conflicts on the ground with AI taxiing right through me. Even had an Ai taxi through me and depart after I was instructed to line up and wait. Imo FShud is currently the most reliable option and I prefer it to BATC and SI by a significant margin, but their vectoring still needs to be more efficient.

Just a heads up for anyone wanting to give SayIntentions a try. This is from their facebook page: During FSExpo, SayIntentions.AI will be free to use within 250NM of KMSP from Wednesday through Monday. The MSP area is open to new users and expired accounts, so whether you’re trying us for the first time or getting back into the cockpit, the MSP bubble is yours to fly.

Everyone has different tastes and expectations, however, I actually prefer FSHud voices over the BATC local voices (I don't use the premium). You can also adjust the tempo of the speech. I set mine to 120% which results in a more realistic speech tempo based on what I hear on live atc. I can't say how much the voices have improved as I only acquired FSHud about 2 weeks ago. It certainly has room for improvement in some areas, but, on balance, I currently prefer it to BATC. On my last flight with BATC, the ATC stopped talking near the end of my arrival into CYVR. At least it still kept talking to all of the AI traffic lol. It is very frustrating when a flight ends like that.

That may be true. I am fine with injecting scheduled traffic into FSHud using AIGTC. Works great for me and gives me more traffic that the BATC scheduled traffic injection does even with max settings. It also performs smoother fo me. I tried the new FSHud live traffic injector a few times and did see some flights that where also on FR24, but as FSHud takes control of all injected traffic they are not in their actual real time locations. This will be the same as BATC if it is indeed managing the realtime traffic as part of its overall ATC system. I have not tried BATC live traffic injection as I do not maintain a Navigraph subscription year round.

I think FSHud is the better option if you are just wanting it for traffic injection. With BATC, it will not load any AI traffic until you have provided a SimBrief flight plan, and even then I believe, but am not 100% sure, that it may only inject traffic along your planned route. By comparison, FSHud will inject traffic wherever you are, even without a flight plan. It will also control that injected traffic so that it behaves in a realistic manner, which is something even FSLTL cannot do since MSFS 2024 takes control of its injected traffic. FSHud also lets you listen to ATC interacting with all of the injected traffic across a list of various frequencies from around the area you are flying, which BATC does not provide unless you are actively interacting with the ATC itself. On top of that, FSHud displays all AI traffic on a map, including speed and altitude. For those reasons I think FSHud is worth the money just for its ability to provide immersive traffic injection along with meaningful ATC chatter, even if you choose not to interact with the ATC itself.

You should consider fshud. I have had BATC for over a year and while it is improving, I just purchases fshud and after the first few flights, I definitely prefer it in most aspects. You can just get a one month sub to Navigraph to get all your Navdata in sync with it, Simbrief and msfs.

Glad it helped. SU5 was almost unusable for me until I removed them. Lots of users reporting the same on the official forum.

If you have any mumudesign powerlines, solarfarms and/or marinas in your community folder, try disabling them. Many users including myself found them to be a significant cause of pauses and stutters since SU5. They were not an issue in SU4, so this is new.

My system is very similar to yours, except I fly in Quest 3 VR. How did you find the performance impact compared to other AI traffic options you have used? Does it induce stutters or long frames on approach and while taxiing. How fluid is the movement of the AI traffic (I have BATC and find the movement quite jerky compared to MSFS default live traffic).

Please add recent posts to the homepage again.

Same here. When wearing my glasses they contacted the lenses of the headset which caused a small mark on the headset lens and on my eyeglasses. Got some Hons VR prescription inserts and it is far more convenient and comfortable and the headset lenses are protected.

I agree that the auto Gen building textures could use some improvement. I find many of the houses look like weathered cottages vs suburban homes. In older sims addon developers came up with improved autogen packages. Surprised this has never happened since FS20.

Yes, the Sim will automatically use any matching models it finds in the community folder. If it can't find a match it will default to its closest generic model.

Virtual Desktop can be better than using the link cable with the Quest 3, but works best with a dedicated router connected to your PC by ethernet located within a few feet from where you sim. Something that helps me get a sharper image by a considerable margin is to reduce the FOV to about 85% in OXR Toolkit. This hardly changes the field of view as the part it reduces is already hidden by the mask, but it renders more pixels in a reduced area for a sharper image for a very noticeable improvement on my hardware. I also use 72 hz refresh on the Quest 3 restrict my FPS to 36 in MSFS. This gets doubled to 72 FPS by using SSW in Virtual Desktop. I use DLSS Perfomance with the latest dll and Preset K to help maintain the target FPS in virtually every situation. This is much smoother than TAA for me. Auto FPS can also improve the overall experience. The rest is dependant on in game settings. You do not want to exceed your VRAM not matter what, or you will get major stutters or lags. Setting the in game texture resolution to Medium helps with this and keeps me within the 13GB VRAM of my RTX 3080TI.

You can run the Quest 3 many different ways including the link cable, the built in Air Link, or from your existing router. However, for best results a 2nd dedicated router connected to your PC by ethernet and located close to your quest 3 is key. The Virtual Desktop app makes the setup easy and most users find this setup even better than using the link cable. Clarity will be somewhat determined by your GPU. I have an Rtx 3080 ti and I can easily read any text on the panel in MSFS. I have no experience with DCS or with the Pimax, but I do like the almost edge to edge clarity of the Quest 3