4116705510

May all mighty God bless this thine thread revival, may thou flourish in its glory...

I get to return a Saitek Pro Yoke and Rudder Pedals because I don't like them, sadly...

I meant the -700 with either a bare-metal or white scheme, and the SI decal, so you don't see the Southwest livery behind it, just the decal. Thanks!

Could you do an SI without the Southwest stuff in the background, because I really hate Southwest's look...

The fact is that FSX has superceded FS2004 for some time, and all FS2004 is doing is dwindling away. There will still be loyal people, but both developers and customers alike are switching to FSX only. You may still like FS2004, but the fact is that FSX is a mroe dynamic simulator, and developers can do more, immersive things with it for both scenery and airplanes.

Is 737CL the Classic?

There are only two planes that can do Atlanta - Johannseburg, the A340-500 and 777-200LR. The Boeing 747-400, Boeing 747-400ER, or 747-8 are incapable of flying this route, its teh fourth-longes in the world (scheduled)

The models will be the 737 MAX 7, 737 MAX 8, and 737 MAX 9, the 737-600 won't be succeded by a MAX model.

The 787-3 would have been a 787-8, with shorter wings an with winglets for domestic-haul operations, with slightly higher capacity than the 767-300. ANA and JAL had orders, but eventually converted to the 787-8 or 787-9 variants. Most airlines are too cheap and want to use smaller and smaller narrowbodies for domestic ops, rather than widebodies like in the 1970's. ANA and JAL would have used them on high-density inter-Japan and asia flights.ANA will have two versions of the 787-8, one for domestic and one for international, but the aircraft itself is the same, just the seating density is changed.

nevermind

The BBj does have aux tanks and other tanks too, for intercontinental range.

16 hours 30 mins, th longest scheduled flight in the world. I'll use my LR onthe Atlanta - Johannesburg route, 17 hours 5min, fourth longest route in the world, longest for the LR

That is genius! Too bad I kinda own everything PMDG :(

Actually, those ones on avsim and flightsim.com aren't correct, their colors are way off. I had one done for me, and you can het it here:http://www.dantrix.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=820

.

Its about $22.5 Million for the current version, with all new new avionics I stated.Source: nice conversation at EAA AirVenture 2011 with the Hawker-Beechcraft Salesman

I've got a great idea for a PMDG business jet, if they ever chose to make one: The Hawker 4000, produced by Hawker-Beechcraft. It is a super-midsized jet, and has lots of cool things. First, its fuselage is comprised primarily of carbon fiber composites; it has full autothrottle FADEC controls, and each notch of flaps tell the plane to slow itself down to a set speed; it has a full EICAS system, and uses the Honeywell Primus Epic suite. I read about it just recently in Flying Magazine, and aside from Robert Goyer's terrible use of words to embellish for a sponsor, it looks liek a very cool business jet. Large windshield, holds eight people. I think ti would be great to have around the FSX hangar.Hawker Beechcraft Website: http://www.hawkerbee...om/hawker/4000/

Well, the 777 (any type) and the 787 don't compeye with the 787. The 787 replaces the 767 and is a smaller plane. The 777 is the third largest commercial airliner in the world. of course the 787 will be more effecient, they do things differently for different purposes.

Like I said above, the Vref on the 777-300ER (largest variant) is 554,000lbs. The Boeing 787 is a smaller airplane, so its approach speed shouldn't be related to the 777's that much. The 787-8's (current and only variant built) Vref is 380,000lbs

The Max Landing Weight of the 777-300ER (largest variant) is 554,000lbs

it could be both.

Let's see:737NGX:Los Angeles International (LAX) to Los Vegas' McCarran International (LAS)Salt Lake City (SLC) to Jackson Hole, WY (KJAC)Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) to Houston (IAH) 747-400:Tokyo-Narita (NRT) to Sapporo, JapanTokyo-Narita(NRT) to Hong Kong (HKG) [you could also pretend you're pre-1999 and fly into Kai Tak for a big challenge.MD-11:Taipei (TPE) to Hong Kong (HKG)All above are real-world.

You obviously haven't seen the 737NGX yet!

They always make Hawaii look better than the rest, so it looks good for preiews.

If anything, you said early this year in that video . However unless you figure out a way to reverse time and carry the 737NGX programming back with you a year and a half, it may be possible...