EGLD

those interior textures could do with some work, like everything they've released, but this is an elite developer and a day one purchase for me

assumed this was vaporware 😂

"stop enjoying yourself how you like to!" 😂

its windows 11, with latest updates, and hardware as described, it runs fs2020 awesome - FS24 is badly coded and is not able to gracefully handle poor performance like it's predecessor

I've given up in all honesty, I don't think my PC is that bad (Ryzen 9 5950x 16-core 3.4ghz, 3080ti 12gb, 64gb RAM), and I can run FS2020 mostly at high/ultra settings, but I can only run FS24 at medium/low settings and even then I still get crippling single digits eventually, sometimes with the out of memory error, it just feels like there is something fundamentally broken about it on my hardware, it does not feel like a sim that is capable of handling poor performance gracefully, it just becomes unusable then maybe if I'm lucky snaps back to 20-30fps without any reasoning - was it designed specifically for the streamer class and those who can run the latest hardware with frame generation perhaps? I'd be tempted to upgrade the PC as I've done historically at this age, but FS2020 and XP12 run so good I don't see enough reason to put down over £5000 for the latest hardware considering the meager improvements fs24 offers over 20, and all other games run amazing

I can't argue with any of the posts here, the quality of free airports is incredible......but......I really do miss having such a large variety of quality payware airports like there are in MSFS. Everyone wants something different from their simming, but a detailed, real world accurate (which normally means payware) airport is so key for me personally in simming, and we really don't have enough options in XP. And this thread explains exactly why, there is simply not the market for anyone to produce highly detailed payware airports for XP, which is disappointing for me personally.

found the presentation very underwhelming, and short - less than 15 minutes? I was hoping for something about nextgen scenery, but I guess these foundations need to be built first

it doesn't look like it's fitting in more people - the exact opposite in fact

sounds like FR24 need to hire some security minded developers..... APIs that can be abused? development 101 surely

exactly - immersion, just the knowing it's there same reason cabins became mandatory for serious developers

ignore😄

ignore!

he is an airline pilot, as he says in the video - so you already have the view of one real life pilot i think, as others do here, that the issue is that the sim does not accurately model the tyre effect, and it's too "literal" in applying it's logic on touchdown, hence the aircraft immediately shoots in the direction of the tyres, rather than "sliding" a bit in as it does in real life in the direction it's momentum is taking it when he says the wind would not push the aircraft left like that, i suspect he may be referring to how the wind is pushing against the vertical stabiliser which, on the ground, pushes the nose towards the wind it does happen in real life, but far more subtle, giving the pilot the opportunity to apply opposite rudder

the BBJ1 flies 6000nm?

You’re both talking past me, unfortunately. I was trying to identify compelling reasons for me personally to go from FS20 to FS24, and I said I didn’t see any specific new features that I personally find compelling. You've reframed that into “can you keep running old software if you like it?”, which is obviously true but not the point I was making. When I said “compelling,” I meant compelling features in FS24 relative to FS20. Hope that clarifies!